If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Automobile Subsidy
Brent wrote:
> On 2009-11-21, Stephen Sprunk > wrote: Please don't remove attribution lines unless you also remove the _entire_ quote they apply to. >>> Unless he likes to eat and prefers to not "farm", or live near >>> farms... where they move farmed goods from the fields in... trucks. > >> Does it really make sense for us to be shipping produce several thousand >> miles across the country--or even from other continents--when we can >> grow the same crop a few dozen/hundred miles away? > > It does when you consider that big agri-business has paid the elected > office holders considerable amounts of money to make sure the nearby > family farms can't compete with their crops from chile. A more general problem that applies to many facets of our economy. > However at various times of the year the crop might not be available > locally but the crop grown elsewhere might. Out of season it would be > perfectally acceptable to pay the transportation costs to have it. True, and I have no objection to them paying for the _full_ cost of transporting their goods from further away. OTOH, if consumers see that (for instance) strawberries cost more at certain times of year due to higher transportation costs, they might choose to buy something else that is in season locally. >> Ask someone from NYC or a non-US major world city like London or Paris, >> though, and you'll get an entirely different answer. Why would they >> want to deal with the hassle of owning a car, driving in congested >> traffic, trying to find (extremely expensive) parking, etc. when the >> subway is faster, cheaper, and more convenient? > > However that transit is subsidized by lots of people who don't use it. > That's how it becomes "cheap". NYC's subway has the highest farebox recovery rate in the US, and transit ridership there is extremely high, so there aren't many people actually subsidizing it. Some transit systems overseas (e.g. HK, IIRC) actually turn a profit. > And even in cities like London a lot of people still drive because > even with the crushing costs and congestion it's still works better > for them. If some people want to deal with that mess, they're welcome to it. I was just disputing your claim that nobody would ever choose transit over driving when obviously millions of people all over the world do so every day. > In a big city I would live close enough to walk or bike most if not > all year to avoid the hassles of driving and transit. Presuming you can afford to pay the market cost of living that close to where you work, more power to you. That isn't practical or even possible for a large number of people. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Automobile Subsidy | Stephen Sprunk | Driving | 8 | November 30th 09 03:00 AM |
The Automobile Subsidy | [email protected] | Driving | 0 | November 23rd 09 03:01 PM |
The Automobile Subsidy | [email protected] | Driving | 0 | November 23rd 09 02:54 PM |
Automobile | Jacker | Technology | 0 | June 8th 08 07:39 PM |
automobile student | [email protected] | Technology | 2 | April 16th 07 06:32 AM |