Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org

Pszemol wrote:
> "jim beam" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Pszemol wrote:
>>> "jim beam" > wrote in message
>>> t...
>>>>> I was never comparing her 93 to todays 2008 models but I was
>>>>> comparing her
>>>>> 93 now with 185k miles to *the same car* when young, with 10k miles
>>>>> in 1993.
>>>>> Do you really think her 93 with 185k burns less fuel than when it
>>>>> had 10k miles
>>>>> on the odometer? I certainly doubt it.
>>>>
>>>> yes i do - at 10k, the motor is still tight and thus wastes more
>>>> energy on friction.
>>>
>>> Can you point me to some source information on this subject?
>>
>> absolutely. http://www.google.com
>
> trying very hard to be funny?

no, i'm dead serious.


> Show me a document proving what you said about the car engine
> @ 10k being tight and wasting more energy on frictionthan @ 50k.

easy. click on that link and do some homework. or you can go to school
and study things like engineering for a few years.