If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Nah, they're the 2 chambered version. Sound hot though!
-Mike -- A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT Cold air intake FRPP 3.73 gears Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo) Hi-speed fan switch 255/60R-15 rear tires Subframe connectors "Wound Up" > wrote in message ... > I think you'll get your wishes. I don't think anyone wants or cares to > try.... > > On-topic, are your mufflers the newer Flomaster three-chambered ones? > > I'll be replacing the exhaust if I do the blower install next year. > Just curious... > > wrote: > > Amen! And unmoderated it shall remain I hope! > > > > -- > > A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT > > Cold air intake > > FRPP 3.73 gears > > Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter > > Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo) > > Hi-speed fan switch > > 255/60R-15 rear tires > > Subframe connectors > > > > > > "Joe" > wrote in message > > ... > > > >>Bottom line on unmoderated newsgroups: You can call whomever you want > >>whatever you want, but in reality nobody's got the power to do > >>anything. Nominating and electing people for this and that may be > >>social fun and all, but it's got nothing to do with controlling the > >>newsgroup. Nobody controls it - it's unmoderated. > >> > >>Joe > >>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies > >>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC > >> > >> > >>Wound Up > wrote in > : > >> > >> > >>>Backyard Mechanic wrote: > >>> > >>>>Wound Up opined > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>Anyone else? > >>>>> > >>>>>Why single out Bill S.? I Googled my own old posts to this group a > >>>>>few weeks back, some from 7-8 years ago, and in my estimation he > >>>>>was then and is now a fine fellow, if you're not just cruisin for a > >>>>>bruisin to begin with. > >>>>> > >>>>>This is perfectly in the spirit of the current RAMFM. Garth > >>>>>(really nice guy) doesn't want it, and no one else seems to care. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>I didnt really single him out...I made an observation. But it's > >>>>true, nothing attracts flamers like an active "moderator" > >>>> > >>>>And I dont want it either, that's why I nom'd Garth... and because > >>>>I have been known to get ornery once in a while. > >>>> > >>>>But i disagree with you on the state of the group... go back to the > >>>>beginning* Not too much different in content, just goes in cycles. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>* Remember the names?!!! like yesterday > >>> > >>>I've noticed that it's often the case moderated NGs are worse off > >>>for being so. > >>> > >>>Garth would have been a good choice. I'm noticed your ornery > >>>tendencies. And I'm sure you've noticed my insane tendencies. > >>> > >>>If it does go in cycles, this is a definite low point on the curve, > >>>IMO. > >>> It just seemed that back then, there was more technical meatiness > >>> to > >>>this group. > >>> > >>>Thunder Alley... the mother of all loaded topics in RAMFM. Aside > >>>from saying it was entertaining to read, I'm going to leave that one > >>>be. > >>> > >>>I have leared a lot from people in this group. I have just had to > >>>wade through lakes of marshmallow fluff in order to do so. > >>> > >>>I don't really care who the moderator is, but in my estimation, he > >>>or she should have a very solid command of The Art of Usenet Prose > >>>in order to hope to have a chance of survival when things get > >>>prickly. > >>> > >>> > >>>>- - - - - - - -- - - - - > >>>> > >>>>Get this!!! > >>>> > >>>>|> 5. Prediction: If the Mustang returns to the sales levels of > >>>>|> 1991-92, > >>>>then > >>>>|> it is dead. The rear-drive Mustang will be too expensive for > >>>>|> "Front-Drive-Ford" to produce for less than 100,000 cars per > >>>>|> year. Make no mistake about it; Ford is not sentimental. If the > >>>>|> dollars aren't there for them, they will kill it in a heartbeat. > >>>>|> (no Chevy reference implied ;-) > >>>> > >>>>I doubt it.. The Mustang (and Thunderbird) are fundamental to what > >>>>Ford is. I expect Ford to move to a single rear-drive V-8 platform > >>>>for the Mustang, Thunderbird, Lincoln Mark IX, and an unnamed small > >>>>Jaguar and small Lincoln.. (this is all speculated upon/discussed > >>>>in this month's Automobile magazine..) > >>>> > >>>>- Robert W. Hall Aug 8, 1996 > >>>> > >>>>Full Thread... also look at sales figures: > >>>>http://tinyurl.com/63l4c > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > -- > Wound Up J > > 1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified > > Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket > |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Also... I bought a new welder (WF2000 by Campbell Hausfeld--still lower
quality compared to Lincoln, Miller, etc--but I'm just a hobbyist). It's a wire-feed welder & I must say... MUCH better and easier to use than stick welding. I got a couple exhaust hangers welded in now... so exhaust is reaaaaal stable. *phew* on that. Now if I could just get this stinkin ignition problem fixed! -Mike -- A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT Cold air intake FRPP 3.73 gears Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo) Hi-speed fan switch 255/60R-15 rear tires Subframe connectors "Wound Up" > wrote in message ... > I think you'll get your wishes. I don't think anyone wants or cares to > try.... > > On-topic, are your mufflers the newer Flomaster three-chambered ones? > > I'll be replacing the exhaust if I do the blower install next year. > Just curious... > > wrote: > > Amen! And unmoderated it shall remain I hope! > > > > -- > > A happy kid behind the wheel of a 98 Mustang GT > > Cold air intake > > FRPP 3.73 gears > > Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter > > Flowmaster 40 Series mufflers (self-installed woohoo) > > Hi-speed fan switch > > 255/60R-15 rear tires > > Subframe connectors > > > > > > "Joe" > wrote in message > > ... > > > >>Bottom line on unmoderated newsgroups: You can call whomever you want > >>whatever you want, but in reality nobody's got the power to do > >>anything. Nominating and electing people for this and that may be > >>social fun and all, but it's got nothing to do with controlling the > >>newsgroup. Nobody controls it - it's unmoderated. > >> > >>Joe > >>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies > >>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC > >> > >> > >>Wound Up > wrote in > : > >> > >> > >>>Backyard Mechanic wrote: > >>> > >>>>Wound Up opined > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>Anyone else? > >>>>> > >>>>>Why single out Bill S.? I Googled my own old posts to this group a > >>>>>few weeks back, some from 7-8 years ago, and in my estimation he > >>>>>was then and is now a fine fellow, if you're not just cruisin for a > >>>>>bruisin to begin with. > >>>>> > >>>>>This is perfectly in the spirit of the current RAMFM. Garth > >>>>>(really nice guy) doesn't want it, and no one else seems to care. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>I didnt really single him out...I made an observation. But it's > >>>>true, nothing attracts flamers like an active "moderator" > >>>> > >>>>And I dont want it either, that's why I nom'd Garth... and because > >>>>I have been known to get ornery once in a while. > >>>> > >>>>But i disagree with you on the state of the group... go back to the > >>>>beginning* Not too much different in content, just goes in cycles. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>* Remember the names?!!! like yesterday > >>> > >>>I've noticed that it's often the case moderated NGs are worse off > >>>for being so. > >>> > >>>Garth would have been a good choice. I'm noticed your ornery > >>>tendencies. And I'm sure you've noticed my insane tendencies. > >>> > >>>If it does go in cycles, this is a definite low point on the curve, > >>>IMO. > >>> It just seemed that back then, there was more technical meatiness > >>> to > >>>this group. > >>> > >>>Thunder Alley... the mother of all loaded topics in RAMFM. Aside > >>>from saying it was entertaining to read, I'm going to leave that one > >>>be. > >>> > >>>I have leared a lot from people in this group. I have just had to > >>>wade through lakes of marshmallow fluff in order to do so. > >>> > >>>I don't really care who the moderator is, but in my estimation, he > >>>or she should have a very solid command of The Art of Usenet Prose > >>>in order to hope to have a chance of survival when things get > >>>prickly. > >>> > >>> > >>>>- - - - - - - -- - - - - > >>>> > >>>>Get this!!! > >>>> > >>>>|> 5. Prediction: If the Mustang returns to the sales levels of > >>>>|> 1991-92, > >>>>then > >>>>|> it is dead. The rear-drive Mustang will be too expensive for > >>>>|> "Front-Drive-Ford" to produce for less than 100,000 cars per > >>>>|> year. Make no mistake about it; Ford is not sentimental. If the > >>>>|> dollars aren't there for them, they will kill it in a heartbeat. > >>>>|> (no Chevy reference implied ;-) > >>>> > >>>>I doubt it.. The Mustang (and Thunderbird) are fundamental to what > >>>>Ford is. I expect Ford to move to a single rear-drive V-8 platform > >>>>for the Mustang, Thunderbird, Lincoln Mark IX, and an unnamed small > >>>>Jaguar and small Lincoln.. (this is all speculated upon/discussed > >>>>in this month's Automobile magazine..) > >>>> > >>>>- Robert W. Hall Aug 8, 1996 > >>>> > >>>>Full Thread... also look at sales figures: > >>>>http://tinyurl.com/63l4c > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > -- > Wound Up J > > 1967 Mustang coupe, restored & modified > > Remove "put her" to reply in that bucket > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|