Inflated your tires lately? a petition

Joey Tribiani wrote:
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Joey Tribiani wrote:
>>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >>
>>>> My only agenda is that I don't like lies. Is keeping your tires properly
>>>> inflated going to save you gas? (as Obama suggested)
>>> sure it will.... but you'll save more by keeping it properly tuned... but
>>> i digress
>>>
>> I agree. Anything you do that optimizes the performance (read as keeping
>> within specifications) of the individual parts of the car will improve
>> it's efficiency.
>>
>>>> Did Iraq have chemical, biological and nuclear weapons? (as we were told
>>>> by the Bush gov.)
>>> i don't know the answer to that any more than you do...
>> The answer is no, they didn't. In fact, the search for those weapons
>> stopped in Jan 2005, and none have been found since. Further, Iraq had not
>> developed their WMD program since the mid 90's.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Survey_Group
>
> i got confused by the "did Iraq have" part of the question.. as i said, i
> don't know any better than you do....
>
>
So basically, when the Bush gov went before the united nations and said
Iraq had mobile chemical weapons facilities, and nuclear capabilities
etc. they were telling us all the truth?

"Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
...
> So basically, when the Bush gov went before the united nations and said
> Iraq had mobile chemical weapons facilities, and nuclear capabilities etc.
> they were telling us all the truth?

as i said, i don't know any better than you do(that the third or forth
time?).... then again, maybe i'm mistaken and you were there... you tell
us... if you have two reports, how do *you* decide which to believe?

Joey Tribiani wrote:
> "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
> ...
> > So basically, when the Bush gov went before the united nations and said
>> Iraq had mobile chemical weapons facilities, and nuclear capabilities etc.
>> they were telling us all the truth?
>
> as i said, i don't know any better than you do(that the third or forth
> time?).... then again, maybe i'm mistaken and you were there... you tell
> us... if you have two reports, how do *you* decide which to believe?
>
>
Which report did you read? and what is your basis of belief?

On Aug 17, 1:00*am, Rev Turd Fredericks >
wrote:
> Joey Tribiani wrote:
> > "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> >> My only agenda is that I don't like lies. Is keeping your tires properly
> >> inflated going to save you gas? (as Obama suggested)
>
> > sure it will.... but you'll save more by keeping it properly tuned... but i
> > digress
>
> I agree. Anything you do that optimizes the performance (read as keeping
> * within specifications) of the individual parts of the car will improve
> it's efficiency.
>
>
>
> >> Did Iraq have chemical, biological and nuclear weapons? (as we were told by
> >> the Bush gov.)
>
> > i don't know the answer to that any more than you do...
>
> The answer is no, they didn't. In fact, the search for those weapons
> stopped in Jan 2005, and none have been found since. Further, Iraq had
> not developed their WMD program since the mid 90's.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Survey_Group

Well if it says it on wikipedia then it must be true... Um, do you
actually have any idea how wikipedia works? :-) Hang on, I think I
see Bigfoot in my back yard. I'm going to go say I did on wikipedia
now so that it will be true.

On Aug 17, 3:32*am, Rev Turd Fredericks >
wrote:
> Joey Tribiani wrote:
> > "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
> ...
> > *> So basically, when the Bush gov went before the united nations and said
> >> Iraq had mobile chemical weapons facilities, and nuclear capabilities etc.
> >> they were telling us all the truth?
>
> > as i said, i don't know any better than you do(that the third or forth
> > time?).... then again, maybe i'm mistaken and you were there... you tell
> > us... if you have two reports, how do *you* decide which to believe?
>
> Which report did you read? and what is your basis of belief?

Let me guess. The report you read was on wikipedia. hahaha! FAIL.

"Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
...
> Joey Tribiani wrote:
>> "Rev Turd Fredericks" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > So basically, when the Bush gov went before the united nations and
>> said
>>> Iraq had mobile chemical weapons facilities, and nuclear capabilities
>>> etc. they were telling us all the truth?
>>
>> as i said, i don't know any better than you do(that the third or forth
>> time?).... then again, maybe i'm mistaken and you were there... you tell
>> us... if you have two reports, how do *you* decide which to believe?
> Which report did you read? and what is your basis of belief?

Turd, take it easy guy... i was just messing with you, like i do *any*
person that starts a political thread... when it comes to politics it is
very easy.... i have beliefs, but you'll never hear me stating them in a car
group... head on over to a politics board if you want to discuss politics..

"Joey Tribiani" > wrote in message
...
> i have beliefs, but you'll never hear me stating them in a car group...
> head on over to a politics board if you want to discuss politics..
>

AGREED!! Might as well be discussing why star trek is better/worse than star
wars....

On Aug 17, 10:58*am, "Tracy" <pepsifreek at hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Joey Tribiani" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
> > i have beliefs, but you'll never hear me stating them in a car group...
> > head on over to a politics board if you want to discuss politics..
>
> AGREED!! Might as well be discussing why star trek is better/worse than star
> wars....

Everybody who is anybody *knows* that Star Trek is way out of Star
Wars' league. :-)

>"Shag" > wrote in message
...
>On Aug 17, 10:58 am, "Tracy" <pepsifreek at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "Joey Tribiani" > wrote in message
>.>
>> ...
>>
>> > i have beliefs, but you'll never hear me stating them in a car group...
>> > head on over to a politics board if you want to discuss politics..
>>
>> AGREED!! Might as well be discussing why star trek is better/worse than
>> star
>> wars....
>
>Everybody who is anybody *knows* that Star Trek is way out of Star
>Wars' league. :-)
>

Oh yeah??... Well my wookie can kick your tribble's ass any day!!

"Tracy" <pepsifreek at hotmail.com> wrote in message
. ..
>
>
> Oh yeah??... Well my wookie can kick your tribble's ass any day!!
>
>

I think that kind of statement belongs in a different group too! LOL