A lap around "The Ring"

Just like ya'll.... Blame the US for the Brittish Monarchy.... Why not
you blame us for all your other problems why not this one. No matter how
absurd...

Mitch


"Andrew MacPherson" > wrote in message
ddress_disguised...
> In article
> >,
> (Byron Forbes) wrote:
>
>> the death of the Queen
>
> Elton John died?
>
> Oh, you mean *that* Queen. <shrug> Despite momentary lapses of
> sanity (eg when Diana died) nobody really gives a f*ck about the monarchy.
> They're just a bunch of Germans imported to attract American tourists :-)
>
> Andrew McP

In article > ,
(Mitch_A) wrote:

> you blame us for all your other problems
> why not this one

Problem? The Windsors aren't a problem, they're a tourist attraction that
probably draws in more money to UK PLC than they cost us.

You have your creationist museum. We have a few thousand years' worth of
inbred monarchy. Two nations joined across the ocean by common insanity.
Makes you proud ;-)

Andrew McP

LOL

"Andrew MacPherson" > You have your creationist museum. We have a few
thousand years' worth of
> inbred monarchy. Two nations joined across the ocean by common insanity.
> Makes you proud ;-)
>
> Andrew McP

>> More than two centuries of accrued rights and civil balances have
been
watered down or made illegal>>

What a crock. All that happened was that rules for dealing with
criminals were extended over to counter terrorist activities whereas
before they were considered separate. Keep reading to get real info,
and put down Michael Moore's latest screed.

Like any other search warrant, delayed-notification warrants under
Section 213 may only be issued after showing probable cause and
obtaining the express approval of a judge.

Nothing changed here with the Patriot Act. This had always been the
case and all that happened is that the rules for criminal searches were
extended to cases of suspected domestic terrorism.

>> "Muslim-Americans have been arrested and imprisoned without trial"

That's an interesting charge. What is your substantiation for it?

Your allegation: " FBI agents have the right to go into libraries and
see what people are
reading. "

The Truth:

A: No. Section 215 permits the government to obtain "tangible things"
from third parties in foreign intelligence investigations. Although the
USA PATRIOT Act does not mention libraries, this section could be
applied to library records as business records. Under previous law,
government agents had the ability to access business records, including
library records, with a grand jury subpoena in criminal cases. Section
215 now allows such requests in foreign intelligence cases. An
important protection provides that Section 215 may not be used against
U.S. persons (citizens or permanent resident aliens) solely based on
activities protected by the First Amendment. In practice, these
requests are made only as to specific individuals who are already the
target of an investigation. This provision includes a safeguard that
provides that government agents must seek a court order for the
records, based on a certification from a high-ranking FBI official
(Assistant Special Agent in Charge or higher) that the records sought
are for "an authorized investigation to obtain foreign intelligence
information not concerning a U.S. person or to protect against
international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities." An
additional safeguard requires the Department of Justice to report its
use of this provision to Congress every six months.
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/mie/ctu/FAQ_Patriot.htm

>> Universities are being encouraged to report on people who show
"subversive tendencies".

You'll need to back that claim up.

Why don't you explain to us where ONE THING that he said was
untrue?
WS



"Randy Magruder" > wrote in message
...
> Randy
> >
> > Truth hurts sometimes. Not all have the guts to face it.
> >
> Particularly people like you, just off the mothership. How's Elvis,
> btw? Send my greetings on one of your next trips home.
>
> Randy

"Mitch_A" > wrote in message
. ..
> First dont take my statement out of context. The lives arent "nothing"
but
> the crok tears form some left wing activist are...

The only "croc tears" are coming from the neocons (NONE of whom have served
in the military) who planned this war from the day they stole the 2000
election. Funny that their "successful" war for oil has freed up the oil
supply
so much that I'm now paying $2.30/gal for mid-grade gasoline.
WS

"Bill Bollinger" > wrote in message
om...
> You are the one who has pigeon-hold himself. Not my fault that many of
the
> Western European countries lean to the socialist side and wonder why they
> cannot grow their economies and are falling behind.

Damn right! That's why the Euro is worth so much more than the
Dollar. Looking out for your citizens IS NOT socialist, dumbass.
WS

"Andrew MacPherson" > wrote in message
ddress_disguised...
> In article
> >,
> (Byron Forbes) wrote:
>
>> the death of the Queen
>
> Elton John died?
>
> Oh, you mean *that* Queen. <shrug> Despite momentary lapses of
> sanity (eg when Diana died) nobody really gives a f*ck about the monarchy.
> They're just a bunch of Germans imported to attract American tourists :-)
>

LOL. No doubt Elton is more relevent.

They're certainly not a poster family for the concept of monarchy,
that's for sure.

On the other hand, nearly every prime minister or president of the
"free" world is certainly a poster boy/girl for one of democracy's prime
claims - anyone can make it in a democracy, no matter how stupid.

You're 10 years to late to accuse me of being a marijuana chimney and
even when I was I was 1000 quantum leaps of intelectual accomplishment above
the average bear even after half a dozen party cones of buddah sprikled with
some high grade hashish.

What I'm suggesting here is revolution - they've been happening since
the begginig of time - out with the old, in with the new. Not a
democratically elected "new" though - I think some proper leadership would
be very novel and extremely fascinating to the hoards on this ******** of a
planet that have never been blessed by it.


"Mitch_A" > wrote in message
m...
>I wasnt going to reply to anymore of your utopian conspiracy theories Byron
>but honestly what do you think a shift-r would get us? A different set of
>leaders and rules we all try to abide by? Gee, sound a bit familiar?
>
> I just read an article that stated excessive Marijuana use causes many of
> the same symptoms you exhibit here. Not the least of which are either
> psychosis or paranoia.
>
>
> Mitch
>
>
> "Byron Forbes" > wrote in > I'd prefer they
> just wiped out all politicians, policemen, etc, wiped
>> the legal/foreign policy slate clean and started all over again.
>>
>> A pity you can't just shift - R in real life
>>
>
>

>
> "Mitch_A" > wrote in message
> m...
>>
>> I just read an article that stated excessive Marijuana use causes many of
>> the same symptoms you exhibit here. Not the least of which are either
>> psychosis or paranoia.
>>
>>
>> Mitch
>>

Furthermore, for someone who's selling the idea that the U.S. has done
some good so it deserves to get away with a little uneccessary annihilation
here and there, I think there's no doubt about who's mentality is closer to
an out of it druggo. Your moronic, possibly drug induced attitude is that
the sun shines out of the arse of the U.S. and no ideas to the contrary will
be considered. Talk about deluded denial!