If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
"Steve" > wrote in message > I'll wager you that a headlamp assembly for a Feces is on the order of > $150-$200 US. The problem is that even CHEAP cars have expensive > unique-to-the-model headlamps now. We are exactly on the same page, Steve. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> In North America, the standards for UV and > abrasion resistance are pretty pathetic, as can be seen by walking > down any street and looking at all the yellowed, cloudy, sandblasted > plastic headlight lenses. Yep yep yep. Now I have a question: Is it just my imagination, or do the lights surrounding the headlight, and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn yellow in the same manner as the headlamps? And if it's NOT my imagination, why is this so and why can't they make headlight lenses the same way? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Hugo Schmeisser wrote:
>> In North America, the standards for UV and abrasion resistance are >> pretty pathetic, as can be seen by walking down any street and looking >> at all the yellowed, cloudy, sandblasted plastic headlight lenses. > Yep yep yep. Well...you and I both agree on the matter, but I know at least one person who doesnt. Guy posts under the name of "Boxman". Over on sci.engr.lighting for the past several months he's been telling me I'm full of beans, that the US headlamp standards are better overall than the rest-of-world standards, the US plastic lens degradation-resistance standards are at least as good and probably better, etc. Me, I find it kind of funny that he tries to argue from authority based on his time in the employ of the US auto lighting company that put such godawful lamps on the road as the '96-'00 Chrysler minivan (US/Canada/Mexico) headlamps, amongst many others. To be sure, there are plenty of points that can be debated back and forth regarding the relative merits of the US and rest-of-world car lighting standards. But, gee whiz, his former employer has a *lot* of bad lighting to answer for! Not really where I tend to go for knowledgeable commentary on such matters. Not when there are companies that put out good lamps meeting US standards *and* good lamps meeting rest-of-world standards. > Now I have a question: Is it just my imagination, or do the lights > surrounding the headlight, and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn > yellow in the same manner as the headlamps? And if it's NOT my > imagination, why is this so and why can't they make headlight lenses the > same way? That's an excellent question. I've noticed the same thing you have: On some makes and models, the front signalling lamps don't deteriorate as fast or severely as the adjacent headlamps. Baffling, eh? DS |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
In article ich.edu>, Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>> Now I have a question: Is it just my imagination, or do the lights >> surrounding the headlight, and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn >> yellow in the same manner as the headlamps? And if it's NOT my >> imagination, why is this so and why can't they make headlight lenses the >> same way? > > That's an excellent question. I've noticed the same thing you have: On > some makes and models, the front signalling lamps don't deteriorate as > fast or severely as the adjacent headlamps. Baffling, eh? The factory headlamps on my '97 mustang clouded over and I replaced them after getting sick of polishing them and the driver's side one developing a crack from an impact. However, the turn/marker lights, right next to the headlamps, having seen the exact same conditions over the years remained like new. One has since been replaced due to the poor driving a 17 year old and the other has a very small rock chip in it, but these lamps have been fine. Also the plastic taillamp and marker lamp lenses of my '73 maverick are still like new some 30 years after they were made. Of course the headlamps on that car are sealed beam and glass. I've noticed that the non-headlamps don't appear to have the UV/hardcoat either. Obviously there is a difference in the resin itself. Why that resin does not make for a good headlamp I cannot tell. It seems to be able to be molded with acceptable optical properties. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
"Hugo Schmeisser" > wrote in message
... > Now I have a question: Is it just my imagination, or do the lights > surrounding the headlight, and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn > yellow in the same manner as the headlamps? And if it's NOT my > imagination, why is this so and why can't they make headlight lenses > the same way? My guess is the heat from the headlamps causes the difference. Over time the plastic breaks down from it, I guess. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
In article ich.edu>,
Daniel J. Stern > wrote: >On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Hugo Schmeisser wrote: > >> Now I have a question: Is it just my imagination, or do the lights >> surrounding the headlight, and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn >> yellow in the same manner as the headlamps? And if it's NOT my >> imagination, why is this so and why can't they make headlight lenses the >> same way? > >That's an excellent question. I've noticed the same thing you have: On >some makes and models, the front signalling lamps don't deteriorate as >fast or severely as the adjacent headlamps. Baffling, eh? Isn't heat more of an issue in the headlamp? Both heat and UV can turn plastic yellow. -- There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can result in a fully-depreciated one. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Matthew Russotto wrote:
>>> Is it just my imagination, or do the lights surrounding the headlight, >>> and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn yellow in the same manner as >>> the headlamps? And if it's NOT my imagination, why is this so and why >>> can't they make headlight lenses the same way? >> That's an excellent question. I've noticed the same thing you have: On >> some makes and models, the front signalling lamps don't deteriorate as >> fast or severely as the adjacent headlamps. Baffling, eh? > > Isn't heat more of an issue in the headlamp? Both heat and UV can turn > plastic yellow. Not really, no -- the bigger issue is UV from the headlamp bulbs. Heat's secondary. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
In article ich.edu>, Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Matthew Russotto wrote: > >>>> Is it just my imagination, or do the lights surrounding the headlight, >>>> and also made of clear plastic, NOT turn yellow in the same manner as >>>> the headlamps? And if it's NOT my imagination, why is this so and why >>>> can't they make headlight lenses the same way? > >>> That's an excellent question. I've noticed the same thing you have: On >>> some makes and models, the front signalling lamps don't deteriorate as >>> fast or severely as the adjacent headlamps. Baffling, eh? >> >> Isn't heat more of an issue in the headlamp? Both heat and UV can turn >> plastic yellow. > > Not really, no -- the bigger issue is UV from the headlamp bulbs. Heat's > secondary. Considering the damage is the outside surface of the head lamp, I would say the issue is UV from the sun. If it was UV from the bulb, the inside surface without the hardcoat would yellow and all the polishing in the world wouldn't make a difference. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message oups.com... > >From the dealer, probably so. There may exist aftermarket options you > aren't yet aware of. What year and model Jaguar is this? It is a 99 Van den Plas. Any clues for the owner? > In practice, of course, if you start out with good quality > clear/untinted guards and keep on top of them, cleaning them when they > need it, replacing them when they go cloudy and get scratched, then > you're not too likely to run into legal trouble. In fact, we used to buy a handful of the things and replace them whenever they got dirty. They were only a couple of bucks each. Police here are very unlikely to notice a minor infraction like this. Heck, they don't even notice major infractions unless their 'Boss Hogg' nature comes out. > DS > |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Is the use of "Nite Shades" on taillights legal?
"Steve" > wrote in message ... > wrote: > > > > > A little judgement, used when buying certain automobiles, would go miles. > > If there was much choice, then yes. Have you priced replacement "aero" > headlamps? Even for "common" cars? Or "cheap" cars? > > >Or buy a Ford Feces, > > I'm going to remember that one... :-) > > >or something else within his ability. > > I'll wager you that a headlamp assembly for a Feces is on the order of > $150-$200 US. The problem is that even CHEAP cars have expensive > unique-to-the-model headlamps now. You are not too far off. For a 2003 Ford Focus the list price on the headlights is $161.00. Fordpartsonline will sell you one for $120.75. Of course this is still pretty cheap comapred to say a Toyota Camry ($253 list / $190 discounted). Ed |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|