Chrysler sells all 6400 Dodge Challenger muscle cars

John Harding wrote:
> John Harding > wrote:
>> John Harding > wrote:
>>> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>>>> Peter Franks wrote:
>>>>> Michael Johnson wrote:
>>>>>> Peter Franks wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael Johnson wrote:
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On May 9, 1:56 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Enough Already wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 9, 7:38 am, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> Ok, then name a place that IS optimal for large scale human habitation.
>>>>>
>>>> Al Gores house?.............efficient living for large scale, enough
>>>> FOOD in the refrigerator for the masses.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh fer **** sakes! His place is massive and he's fixed it.
>>> He's also (still) got an office full of Secret
>>> Agents BECAUSE that is what happens to you when you are a former VP.
>>>
>>> Ask that stupid **** Dan Quayle, he's got the same!
>>>
>>> It is not the average house.
>>>
>> I'm Canadian, but what I like the most to do with American things, is that
>> the proper way to refer to Bush, Clinton and Carter is "Mister President"
>>
>> And Dan Quayle or Dick? "Mister Vice President"
>>
>>
>>
>> That is like when you meet The Queen, and you say "Your Majesty"
>>
> Every former Prime Minister in Canada or the UK is properly addressed as
> "Your honour"

Only if I respect them and their office....
You earn respect in America, it's not bestowed upon you by the King.

I use Sir and your Honour when they earn it.

<Poetic Justice >> wrote:
> I'm seeing companies go belly up here in the US... real estate companies
> and builders and car lots..... it's not surprising since the
> government has been bleeding the population dry with it's lack of
> concern for immigration and loss of manufacturing and insatiable
> appetite for new spending and taxes.
>
>
Funny, without immigration, our Social Security would be busted.

The world says that Canada's immigration wll help us in the end.

I know too many friends who are from religious sides, none of the Muslims
want to pull out a Koran and kill me!

They eat, they drink. They're like you and I.

It's hard to be a bigot when you respect people.

John Harding wrote:
> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>> I'm seeing companies go belly up here in the US... real estate companies
>> and builders and car lots..... it's not surprising since the
>> government has been bleeding the population dry with it's lack of
>> concern for immigration and loss of manufacturing and insatiable
>> appetite for new spending and taxes.





> Funny, without immigration, our Social Security would be busted.
It's a pyramid scheme... that's why it needs new people to keep it a float.



> The world says that Canada's immigration wll help us in the end.
Great, enjoy it.


> I know too many friends who are from religious sides, none of the Muslims
> want to pull out a Koran and kill me!
Lucky you.




> They eat, they drink. They're like you and I.
Not quite... but prepare to be assimilated.





> It's hard to be a bigot when you respect people.
You must be getting this from a different post, the above quoted text
can't be construed as Bigoted, even using twisted politically correct
Liberal standards of thought control.

Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
equality* that require us to be the same?

$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto wrote:
> A much-needed $260 million shot in the arm for Chrysler Canada.
> 6.1 litres, 425hp, mileage like a Durango SUV. But do you know why
> this is no threat to the environment? Because none of the buyers of
> these cars are going to use it as a daily driver. They will see
> weekend use in the summer, like most muscle cars.
> Which begs the question, why do they charge a $1200 gas-guzzler tax on
> it in Canada? If you think about it, the guy who opts to drive a
> 200hp 6-cylinder as their daily driver is burning more fuel than a guy
> with the Challenger who drives a 4-cylinder to work.
> Environmental laws need "adjusting."
>
They already tax fuel. The more you use, the more revenue they get.
Ought to be enough for them.

Koyto has nothing to do about climate change. It has everything to do
with global wealth redistribution. It is a communist wet dream come
true. If all Koyto protocols were to be adopted buy all countries,
including China and India, (who are exempt)the total impact would be 1/4
of 1 percent of the carbon in the atmosphere. ****ing on a forest fire
comes to mind. The tax is simply a method of making you pay homage to
their pagan gods. And a carbon credit is simply the way to transfer
wealth from those who are productive to those who are not. Vote wisely
people. A government which promises you everything you need (according
to them) will cost you all that you have.

<Poetic Justice >> wrote:
> Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
> equality* that require us to be the same?
>
Yes, I fundamentally promote "Diversity" and "multiculturalism"

I'm also a somewhat wealthy person who decides on my vote in the means, and
not by political partisan notions.


And your problem is?

John Harding wrote:
> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>> Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
>> equality* that require us to be the same?
>>
> Yes, I fundamentally promote "Diversity" and "multiculturalism"
>
> I'm also a somewhat wealthy person who decides on my vote in the means, and
> not by political partisan notions.
>
>
> And your problem is?


People that think I owe them something because they're breathing.

<Poetic Justice >> wrote:
> John Harding wrote:
> > <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
> >> Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
> >> equality* that require us to be the same?
> >>
> > Yes, I fundamentally promote "Diversity" and "multiculturalism"
> >
> > I'm also a somewhat wealthy person who decides on my vote in the means, and
> > not by political partisan notions.
> >
> >
> > And your problem is?
>
>
> People that think I owe them something because they're breathing.
>

That is your interpretation.


I don't see it as being bigoted.


People have a right to be who they are, as long as they don't threaten me.

I am an agnostic, but I respect the cultures and opinions of people, just as
long as they do not intrude.

John Harding wrote:
> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>> John Harding wrote:
>>> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>>>> Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
>>>> equality* that require us to be the same?
>>>>
>>> Yes, I fundamentally promote "Diversity" and "multiculturalism"
>>>
>>> I'm also a somewhat wealthy person who decides on my vote in the means, and
>>> not by political partisan notions.
>>>
>>>
>>> And your problem is?
>>
>> People that think I owe them something because they're breathing.
>>
>
> That is your interpretation.
>
>
> I don't see it as being bigoted.
>
>
> People have a right to be who they are, as long as they don't threaten me.
>
> I am an agnostic, but I respect the cultures and opinions of people, just as
> long as they do not intrude.

I didn't say I hate anyone, I don't know where you pulled that from...
but if you're talking about Islam.... then half the world is Islamic and
they stand by while a hand full soil their religion..... or maybe they
believe in what the terrorist are doing, but they sure haven't risen up
to condemn and stop child killing in the name of Islam, *why is that* ?

If someone says their killing children on my behalf, I'd have something
to say about it.

On Sat, 10 May 2008 22:35:59 -0700, Bill Ward
> wrote:

>On Sat, 10 May 2008 12:24:49 -0400, John Harding wrote:
>
>> <Poetic Justice >> wrote:
>>> Are you *promoting Diversity* , or planning more laws *promoting
>>> equality* that require us to be the same?
>>>
>> Yes, I fundamentally promote "Diversity" and "multiculturalism"
>
>Do you think everyone should? Or is there room for those who disagree?
>
If one truly supports "Diversity", then that would have to include
Diverse Opinions, since diversity simply means different.

To me, the absolute greatest thing about "Diversity" and
"Multiculturalism" is the food. The rest of it is simply Liberal
Bull**** to legitimize discrimination against another group of people
(namely Straight White Males nowadays).
--
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli

"columbotrek" > wrote in message
...
> $27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto wrote:
>> A much-needed $260 million shot in the arm for Chrysler Canada.
>> 6.1 litres, 425hp, mileage like a Durango SUV. But do you know why
>> this is no threat to the environment? Because none of the buyers of
>> these cars are going to use it as a daily driver. They will see
>> weekend use in the summer, like most muscle cars.
>> Which begs the question, why do they charge a $1200 gas-guzzler tax on
>> it in Canada? If you think about it, the guy who opts to drive a
>> 200hp 6-cylinder as their daily driver is burning more fuel than a guy
>> with the Challenger who drives a 4-cylinder to work.
>> Environmental laws need "adjusting."
>>
> They already tax fuel. The more you use, the more revenue they get. Ought
> to be enough for them.
>
> Koyto has nothing to do about climate change. It has everything to do with
> global wealth redistribution. It is a communist wet dream come true. If
> all Koyto protocols were to be adopted buy all countries, including China
> and India, (who are exempt)the total impact would be 1/4 of 1 percent of
> the carbon in the atmosphere. ****ing on a forest fire comes to mind. The
> tax is simply a method of making you pay homage to their pagan gods. And
> a carbon credit is simply the way to transfer wealth from those who are
> productive to those who are not. Vote wisely people. A government which
> promises you everything you need (according to them) will cost you all
> that you have.
>
Finally someone with an intelligent response! Right on columbotrek.