If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that
> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the > > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then > > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch > > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda > > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light > > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the > > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went > > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used. it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another thing. it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo. Chip |
Ads |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I own a 1995 Honda Passport, so I looked in a '95 Passport wiring diagram. It shows two fuel level sensors, one for the fuel guage and the other operates the low fuel light. I would guess the the low fuel sensor is sticking. All the fuel sensors that I have seen are mechanical....A float rubs on a coil of resistance wire I never let my fuel level get below a quarter full so my low fuel light has never come on. I wonder if mine would stick if I let it get low enough. On 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 -0800, (Chip Stein) wrote: >> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that >> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the >> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then >> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch >> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda >> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light >> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the >> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went >> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used. > > it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to >drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another >thing. > it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo. > Chip |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
My wife drives our Rodeo to work, for the most part, and she is in the habit
of letting it go until the fuel gauge is almost resting on E before getting gas, yet the fuel low indicator light never comes on. On the other hand, the fuel gauge sometimes seems a bit erratic and will not show full even though I have topped off the tank, especially during cold weather. Perhaps one of these days my wife will let the tank get a bit too empty and we'll find out it the low end of the gauge is any more accurate than the high end. Happy Thanksgiving to all!!! -- __________________________________________________ ___ Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati - When all else fails; play dead "Charlie S" > wrote in message ... > > I own a 1995 Honda Passport, so I looked in a '95 Passport wiring > diagram. > > It shows two fuel level sensors, one for the fuel guage and the other > operates the low fuel light. > > I would guess the the low fuel sensor is sticking. > > All the fuel sensors that I have seen are mechanical....A float rubs > on a coil of resistance wire > > I never let my fuel level get below a quarter full so my low fuel > light has never come on. I wonder if mine would stick if I let it get > low enough. > > On 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 -0800, (Chip Stein) > wrote: > >>> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that >>> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the >>> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then >>> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch >>> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda >>> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light >>> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the >>> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went >>> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used. >> >> it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to >>drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another >>thing. >> it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo. >> Chip > |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
My wife drives our Rodeo to work, for the most part, and she is in the habit
of letting it go until the fuel gauge is almost resting on E before getting gas, yet the fuel low indicator light never comes on. On the other hand, the fuel gauge sometimes seems a bit erratic and will not show full even though I have topped off the tank, especially during cold weather. Perhaps one of these days my wife will let the tank get a bit too empty and we'll find out it the low end of the gauge is any more accurate than the high end. Happy Thanksgiving to all!!! -- __________________________________________________ ___ Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati - When all else fails; play dead "Charlie S" > wrote in message ... > > I own a 1995 Honda Passport, so I looked in a '95 Passport wiring > diagram. > > It shows two fuel level sensors, one for the fuel guage and the other > operates the low fuel light. > > I would guess the the low fuel sensor is sticking. > > All the fuel sensors that I have seen are mechanical....A float rubs > on a coil of resistance wire > > I never let my fuel level get below a quarter full so my low fuel > light has never come on. I wonder if mine would stick if I let it get > low enough. > > On 22 Nov 2004 17:59:12 -0800, (Chip Stein) > wrote: > >>> > In my 1985 Celica the sender unit had a seperate contact that >>> > closed when the fuel in the tank got low enough. I suspect the >>> > 1995 Passport uses a similar setup. If this is the situation, then >>> > the fuel tank will have to be removed and the defective switch >>> > repair/replaced. It is posible, thoguh unlikely that Honda >>> > could have used an electronic voltage sensor to trip the light >>> > when the fuel gauge reads below some set point. Given the >>> > greater complexity, ie expense, I suspect that Honda went >>> > with the same basic sensor that my Celica used. >> >> it's the same unit as the fuel level unit. the tanks aren't bad to >>drop. having a brass punch to remove the retaining ring is another >>thing. >> it's an odd animal since it is an isuzu rodeo. >> Chip > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Honda Passport - Timing Belt | ajpdla | Honda | 3 | December 12th 04 03:12 AM |
1995 Honda Passport - Wiring harness - Technical Question | ajpdla | Honda | 0 | November 1st 04 03:40 PM |
Why Are Honda CR-V's Catching Fire? | Sparky | Honda | 4 | October 19th 04 05:35 PM |