Racing Legends cancelled.

Ahem. Do I detect a splash of hypocrisy here, mayhap?
Why don't YOU use your real name in this NG?

Bruce.

"whooo" > wrote in message
...
>
> ....Just put your real name to your accusation or withdraw it. Saying
stuff like that from behind a pseudonym just marks you out as a coward who
is too scared to stand by what he says.

>>>>Unless you are their solicitor I'll refrain from giving someone called
>>>>"whooo" and the rest of Usenet my real name, but in the unlikely event
>>>>your buddies "the West boys" contact me, I'll gladly provide real
>>>>details for the forthcoming libel case.
>>>>You do realise you're looking like a real dick here, don't you ?
>>>
>>>Why wait for them to contact little you? Just contacted them with your
>>>accusation and details. Don't forget to tell them you libelled then on
>>>RAS.
>>
>>
>> Even better, why don't I just fine myself a couple of grand and send them
>> the money ?
>> Mork calling Orson, come in Orson.
>>
>>
>>
> E-mail me your details and I will pass the on.

Done. Thanks a lot. I feel so much better now.
Can you take into consideration 3000 other libellous comments I may have
made in the past ? Great. Ill send those details to you later.
I sure hope your hotmail account can handle all the incoming correspondence.
Eeeek.

Bruce Kennewell wrote:
> Ahem. Do I detect a splash of hypocrisy here, mayhap?
> Why don't YOU use your real name in this NG?

I'm not the one making libellous comments. Ted might say that me calling
him a coward is libellous, but a comment is only libel if it's untrue.
>
> Bruce.
>
> "whooo" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>....Just put your real name to your accusation or withdraw it. Saying
>
> stuff like that from behind a pseudonym just marks you out as a coward who
> is too scared to stand by what he says.
>
>

redTed wrote:
>>>>>Unless you are their solicitor I'll refrain from giving someone called
>>>>>"whooo" and the rest of Usenet my real name, but in the unlikely event
>>>>>your buddies "the West boys" contact me, I'll gladly provide real
>>>>>details for the forthcoming libel case.
>>>>>You do realise you're looking like a real dick here, don't you ?
>>>>
>>>>Why wait for them to contact little you? Just contacted them with your
>>>>accusation and details. Don't forget to tell them you libelled then on
>>>>RAS.
>>>
>>>
>>>Even better, why don't I just fine myself a couple of grand and send them
>>>the money ?
>>>Mork calling Orson, come in Orson.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>E-mail me your details and I will pass the on.
>
>
> Done. Thanks a lot. I feel so much better now.
> Can you take into consideration 3000 other libellous comments I may have
> made in the past ? Great. Ill send those details to you later.
> I sure hope your hotmail account can handle all the incoming correspondence.
> Eeeek.
>
>
Unfortunately the account has expired. How about you just post your
details in here? Unless you are scared that the Wests will see your
libel as an easy way to make some cash?

Sorry for confusing you but I was referring to your use of a disguise.

Irrespective of libellous comments or not, isn't it a tad hypocritical to be
castigating someone else for their anonymity when you are also hiding behind
a mask?

Seems to me that those who live in glass houses, etcetera.

BK

"whooo" > wrote in message
...
>
> I'm not the one making libellous comments.

Bruce Kennewell wrote:
> Sorry for confusing you but I was referring to your use of a disguise.
>
> Irrespective of libellous comments or not, isn't it a tad hypocritical to be
> castigating someone else for their anonymity when you are also hiding behind
> a mask?
>
> Seems to me that those who live in glass houses, etcetera.
>
I think you are the confused one. The chap made I libellous comment that
he almost certainly wouldn't have made had he been posting from a
position of full accountability.

Well, seeing as I'm confused, let me ask the simple question that might end
my discombobulation.......
Why do YOU hide behind a nom-de-plume?

Bruce.

"whooo" > wrote in message
...
>
> I think you are the confused one.

RedTed, you do realize who Gregor is, don't you?

Bruce Kennewell wrote:
> Well, seeing as I'm confused, let me ask the simple question that might end
> my discombobulation.......
> Why do YOU hide behind a nom-de-plume?
>

Not because I want to libel people and get away with it. Some people
wear hoods so they can get away with committing crime. I wear a hood to
keep my head warm. There's nothing wrong with wearing a hood to keep the
old head warm, is there?

Let Ted come forward, like a man, make his allegation and let the West
boys decide how to proceed, I say. What's wrong with that suggestion?

Well, according to you, the problem with that suggestion is that I don't
post under my real name!

whooo wrote:
>
> Not because I want to libel people and get away with it. Some people
> wear hoods so they can get away with committing crime. I wear a hood to
> keep my head warm. There's nothing wrong with wearing a hood to keep the
> old head warm, is there?
>
> Let Ted come forward, like a man, make his allegation and let the West
> boys decide how to proceed, I say. What's wrong with that suggestion?
>
> Well, according to you, the problem with that suggestion is that I don't
> post under my real name!

Are you seriously suggesting that he posts his personal information to a
NG, especially after he offered to send it to your mail addy if you
provided a working one ?


Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."

--Our Lord John Cleese--