Vista license agreement is a joke

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 02:45:31 GMT, Mitch.A wrote:

> Ooooooh a tough guy with an authority complex and no sense, what a
> combination. Your mommy must be so proud...
>
> You really shouldn't miss your regularly scheduled medications anymore ok.
>
>
> Buh-Bye loser!

No one gives a **** what some **** who uses Microsoft Live Mail as a news
reader thinks. That's proof enough that you are a Microsoft weenie and is
not to be trusted.

Hey MitchAsshole,

I suggest you get one of these
http://dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4542 and stick it on your big fat
head and help Microsoft sell the turd. They'll need all the help they can
get this time out.

"Mitch.A" > wrote in message
om...
> Ooooooh a tough guy with an authority complex and no sense, what a
> combination. Your mommy must be so proud...
>

Taking into account the so called "authorities" on this ******** of a
planet, an "authority complex" is simply a natural state.

Whilst on this subject, I'd appreciate it if someone could clarify the
following -

Do you need a seperate license for each and every seperate computer you
own? (ie you pay extra for each computer)
Will this be different with Vista?

If so, this is an insane policy - it's like needing to own a different
set of tools for every car you own - just nuts!

I'm thinking about getting an eye patch with matching parrot real soon -
some companies really ask for it don't they!?



"Bill Worrel" > wrote in message
news:Nr2dnRiQWZtpz6zYnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@wideopenwest .com...
> That's true that XP keeps track of changes but after 120 days of no
> changes, you start fresh with a new baseline based on the current
> hardware. Also if you change an item in the same category e.g. video card,
> you can change it as many times as you want and you won't be any more
> likely to have to activate.
>
> The likely reason that Byron and Scott had to re-activate when they
> changed their NIC is that the NIC counts for three "votes".
>
> See WPA info he
> http://aumha.org/win5/a/wpa.htm
>
> It'll be interesting if Vista will work the same way.
>
> The article "debunking" licensing changes mentions that only 5% of PC
> owners upgrade their own computers. That may be true but how many upgrade
> their friends and relatives computers? I know that I've upgraded quite a
> few over the years. Also, how many people take their machines in to a
> computer store and have it upgraded.
>
> Bill
>
>
> "Andrew MacPherson" > wrote in message
> ddress_disguised...
>> (Byron Forbes) wrote:
>>
>>> I ONLY added a NIC card recently and had to re-activate.
>>
>> That's because XP keeps track of minor changes. When you accumulate
>> enough small changes they add up to a big change and trigger activation.
>>
>> Anyway, this is a side issue. The real issue is WTF does Vista have
>> which is worth paying for? Obviously there are always people who must
>> have the latest car/furniture/vid card/OS, but unlike previous upgrades
>> XP already provides a pretty solid base, and issues like security are
>> only issues to people who are careless.
>>
>> I'll be interested to see how sales go in the first 12 months.
>>
>> Andrew McP
>>
>
>

Garrot wrote:
> Hey MitchAsshole,
>
> I suggest you get one of these
> http://dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4542 and stick it on your big fat
> head and help Microsoft sell the turd. They'll need all the help they can
> get this time out.

Who is this Mitch A ? Is he a troll?

Mitch.A wrote:
> Personally I trust the author P.Thurott(sp?) much more than a ignorant
> bull**** spreading punk like the OP.
>
>
>
> "Garrot" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 21:59:25 GMT, Mitch.A wrote:
>>
>> Personally I trust the author
>>
>>> P.Thurott(sp?) much more than a ignorant bull**** spreading punk like
>>> the
>>> OP.
>>
>>
>> Thurott is a shill you dumb ****.
>
>
Another BS post from Mitch AKA Allan 'The Traitor' Mayer. In the war on
terror, Allan/Mitch are is on the side of terror. Search google and read
how he threatened other user with death and admitted funding terror
organisation. Cnut!

timmy thompson wrote:
> Garrot wrote:
>
>> Hey MitchAsshole,
>>
>> I suggest you get one of these
>> http://dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=4542 and stick it on your big
>> fat
>> head and help Microsoft sell the turd. They'll need all the help they can
>> get this time out.
>
>
> Who is this Mitch A ? Is he a troll?

Mitch AKA Allan'The Traitor'Mayer. In the war on terror, Allan/Mitch is
on the side of terror. Search google and read how he threatened other
user with death and admitted funding terror organisation. Cnut!

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:13:19 GMT, Trev B wrote:

>> Another BS post from Mitch AKA Allan 'The Traitor' Mayer. In the war on
> terror, Allan/Mitch are is on the side of terror. Search google and read
> how he threatened other user with death and admitted funding terror
> organisation. Cnut!

Hey, I see AM made a post to flight-sim just a few days ago using his AM
moniker.

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:09:44 +1000, Byron Forbes wrote:

> Whilst on this subject, I'd appreciate it if someone could clarify the
> following -
>
> Do you need a seperate license for each and every seperate computer you
> own? (ie you pay extra for each computer)
> Will this be different with Vista?
>
> If so, this is an insane policy - it's like needing to own a different
> set of tools for every car you own - just nuts!
>
> I'm thinking about getting an eye patch with matching parrot real soon -
> some companies really ask for it don't they!?

Basically that is what they are saying. Every two hardware upgrades you
will need a new version of Vista. Just do as I will be doing and tell them
to STFU and activate my copy of Vista, quick like.

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:00:08 +1000, Byron Forbes wrote:


> Taking into account the so called "authorities" on this ******** of a
> planet, an "authority complex" is simply a natural state.

Yea, a litle bit of paranoia is a good thing. Mitch is so 'effed up from
late nights trouble shooting Windows he just does as the big man says.