If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
Regular readers may remember me ranting about a cambelt failure on a 156GTA.
To cut a long story short, I had suggested that I had had a bad deal, having been charged over £2000 to be told that there was "no damage". Having written in October and failed to make contact with anyone until December, I was then promised a letter. Nothing. On January 31st I eventually managed to speak to a "customer service executive" who offered me a sum of money as a goodwill gesture. He apologised profusely about the lack of communication and promised me a formal offer by recorded delivery within 48 Hours. Guess what? Nothing. 4 weeks later I made contact again and received an e-mail asking me to accept the offer. I replied immediately. Nothing. I rang last week. "What e-mail?" I received a phone call on Thursday promising me another call from someone who would sort it out immediately. Nothing. In the meantime, I have had 3 phonecalls and 5 letters inviting me to drive a 159. So- a cambelt failure on September 1st, well within the recommended limit, on a car exclusively serviced by an Alfa Dealer. £2000 out of pocket, £300 car hire (it took them over3 weeks to find out there was nothing wrong) and treated with absolute contempt. I've had 7 Alfas (and a few Fiats and a Lancia) and I deluded myself that having a GTA, being quite rare, made me - at the very least- a customer worth keeping. God help 'em. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
"Steve Byatt" > wrote in message ... > Regular readers may remember me ranting about a cambelt failure on a > 156GTA. To cut a long story short, ...<snip> I couldn't agree more than with your entire story... I had a clutch failiure at 50k on a car that had an alfa full service history - the car was only 2.5 years old - i had it from new. Alfa UK didn;t want to know and wanted to charge me £500 to open it up. Then it could have been another £900 to replace the clutch or another £500 to put it back together. I went to my local garagae who removed and replaced the entire clutch and put it back together for £400 - and he even waived the pick up fee he said he was going to charge. Subsequently I have sold my alfa and I will be going elswhere in the future... Dom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
Steve Byatt > wrote:
> Regular readers may remember me ranting about a cambelt failure on a 156GTA. > To cut a long story short, I had suggested that I had had a bad deal, having > been charged over £2000 to be told that there was "no damage". Having > written in October and failed to make contact with anyone until December, I > was then promised a letter. Nothing. On January 31st I eventually managed to > speak to a "customer service executive" who offered me a sum of money as a > goodwill gesture. He apologised profusely about the lack of communication > and promised me a formal offer by recorded delivery within 48 Hours. Guess > what? Nothing. 4 weeks later I made contact again and received an e-mail > asking me to accept the offer. I replied immediately. Nothing. I rang last > week. "What e-mail?" I received a phone call on Thursday promising me > another call from someone who would sort it out immediately. Nothing. > In the meantime, I have had 3 phonecalls and 5 letters inviting me to drive > a 159. So- a cambelt failure on September 1st, well within the recommended > limit, on a car exclusively serviced by an Alfa Dealer. £2000 out of pocket, > £300 car hire (it took them over3 weeks to find out there was nothing wrong) > and treated with absolute contempt. I've had 7 Alfas (and a few Fiats and a > Lancia) and I deluded myself that having a GTA, being quite rare, made me - > at the very least- a customer worth keeping. God help 'em. OK, admittedly Alfa UK customer service is terrible, but, honestly, didn't you do *any* research on the car before you bought it? - I thought almost everyone knew that the cambelt change interval in the handbook was a work of fiction? In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper than a new engine. -- Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo' http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 - Alfa 75 TSpark Alfa 156 2.0 TSpark Lusso - Fiat Marea 20v HLX - COSOC KOTL BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC # |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
> In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any > manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between > 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper > than a new engine. I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be well before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open ( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving part) .. If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is at fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this should be open to interpritation... i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything on it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage warinty on all parts!!! They get away with too much - IMHO anyway... Dom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
Domestos wrote: > > In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any > > manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between > > 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper > > than a new engine. > > I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be well > before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open > ( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving part) > . If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company isat > fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! > > If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a > cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this > should be open to interpritation... > > i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... > I totaly agree, Has anyone here ever had a letter from Alfa Romeo to tell them that the belts needed changing before the mileage stated in the handbook? I have never had one. I recently got in touch with Alfa GB about recalls I have not received, they said they would look into it and I would hear from them within 48 hours. that was 4 weeks ago and I have heard nothing. While servicing my car last week, the dealer decided to grease the bonnet catch as they said some people had had a bit of trouble with this item. But still no word from Alfa Romeo. John. UK. > Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything on > it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage > warinty on all parts!!! They get away with too much - IMHO anyway... > > Dom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
I had the very same problem with a toyota celica, full toyota service
history at the garage i brought the car from. Anyway, like you i had a cambelt go west well within the life span of a cam belt, and like you i got no help at all from toyota!! So i took the dealership to the small claims court................and won!!! £1638.00 + costs "John, UK." > wrote in message ups.com... Domestos wrote: > > In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any > > manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between > > 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper > > than a new engine. > > I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be > well > before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open > ( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving > part) > . If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is > at > fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! > > If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a > cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this > should be open to interpritation... > > i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... > I totaly agree, Has anyone here ever had a letter from Alfa Romeo to tell them that the belts needed changing before the mileage stated in the handbook? I have never had one. I recently got in touch with Alfa GB about recalls I have not received, they said they would look into it and I would hear from them within 48 hours. that was 4 weeks ago and I have heard nothing. While servicing my car last week, the dealer decided to grease the bonnet catch as they said some people had had a bit of trouble with this item. But still no word from Alfa Romeo. John. UK. > Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything > on > it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage > warinty on all parts!!! They get away with too much - IMHO anyway... > > Dom |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:30:10 GMT, "Domestos" >
wrote: >> In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any >> manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between >> 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper >> than a new engine. > >I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be well >before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open >( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving part) >. If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is at >fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! > >If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a >cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this >should be open to interpritation... > >i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... > >Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything on >it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage >warinty on all parts!!! What - even tyres? Seriously, I don't think it's sensible to expect manufacturers to guarantee all parts for the service interval. There is a sort of bell-curve for part life, and some parts will fail early. If we demanded guarantees for everything, manufacturers would respond by specifying much more frequent changes and we'd probably end up worse off. But for parts where failure means danger (brakes) or damage which goes well beyond the cost of a replacement part (cam-belt) then I think it is reasonable to demand guarantees. [1] And in those cases I think using the small claims court is an excellent idea. [1] Or alternatively a means by which an owner without special skills or equipment can check for wear/consumption regularly - as with tyres and oil. -- Stephen Poley |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
> "John, UK." > wrote in message
> ups.com... > > Domestos wrote: >> > In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any >> > manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere >> > between >> > 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper >> > than a new engine. >> >> I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be >> well >> before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open >> ( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving >> part) >> . If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is >> at >> fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! >> >> If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a >> cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this >> should be open to interpritation... >> >> i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... >> > I totaly agree, > Has anyone here ever had a letter from Alfa Romeo to tell them that the > belts needed changing before the mileage stated in the handbook? I have > never had one. > I recently got in touch with Alfa GB about recalls I have not received, > they said they would look into it and I would hear from them within 48 > hours. that was 4 weeks ago and I have heard nothing. While servicing > my car last week, the dealer decided to grease the bonnet catch as they > said some people had had a bit of trouble with this item. But still no > word from Alfa Romeo. > John. UK. > >> Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything >> on >> it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage >> warinty on all parts!!! They get away with too much - IMHO anyway... >> >> Dom > "Muttsdanglers" > wrote in message .uk... >I had the very same problem with a toyota celica, full toyota service >history at the garage > i brought the car from. > Anyway, like you i had a cambelt go west well within the life span of a > cam belt, and like you > i got no help at all from toyota!! > So i took the dealership to the small claims court................and > won!!! > > £1638.00 + costs > > > I was going to say, that would be route I went down if I had the problems the OP has... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
Hi Stephen
Your right, we can't expect the manufacturers to guarantee to cover every part, but when the manufacturer states the mileage or timespan in which a part should be replaced it then becomes a whole new ballgame!! My lawyer argued that if they set these dates / mileages and i followed the service plan to the letter, use all (in my case) Toyota parts supplied and fitted by the main dealer, then that made the toyota dealership totally responsible for all of the repairs to my car when the cambelt snapped 10k earlier than it should have done!! So i ended up getting all of my money back plus the costs!! Paul "Stephen Poley" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:30:10 GMT, "Domestos" > > wrote: > >>> In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any >>> manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere between >>> 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper >>> than a new engine. >> >>I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be >>well >>before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open >>( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving >>part) >>. If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is >>at >>fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! >> >>If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a >>cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this >>should be open to interpritation... >> >>i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... >> >>Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything >>on >>it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage >>warinty on all parts!!! > > What - even tyres? > > Seriously, I don't think it's sensible to expect manufacturers to > guarantee all parts for the service interval. There is a sort of > bell-curve for part life, and some parts will fail early. If we demanded > guarantees for everything, manufacturers would respond by specifying > much more frequent changes and we'd probably end up worse off. > > But for parts where failure means danger (brakes) or damage which goes > well beyond the cost of a replacement part (cam-belt) then I think it is > reasonable to demand guarantees. [1] And in those cases I think using > the small claims court is an excellent idea. > > > [1] Or alternatively a means by which an owner without special skills or > equipment can check for wear/consumption regularly - as with tyres and > oil. > > -- > Stephen Poley |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
customer service
Apart from the inference that I'm stupid- thanks for the responses. My gripe
is with the company and their total disdain. To get fobbed off repeatedly since last September is appalling. In my original posting (just after the belt failed), I explained that I had experienced a loss of compression- took the car in to the dealer and asked for their advice about the cambelts ('cos that's what I originally thought had happened). They told me that there was not a problem and that there was no need to replace the belt early.. they claimed that the cambelt horror stories were restricted to the 4 cylinder engines. Having had a belt failure on a GTV (inside warranty and well, well before the recommended mileage) and no problems on the 3 V6 cars I had previously owned, I believed them. OOps.. I now realise why Stephen H called me a fool. Obviously for believeing an Alfa Dealer... or perhaps for just persisting with Alfa even after 20 years of driving them and being treated like an idiot by them. "Muttsdanglers" > wrote in message o.uk... > Hi Stephen > > Your right, we can't expect the manufacturers to guarantee to cover every > part, but when the manufacturer > states the mileage or timespan in which a part should be replaced it then > becomes a whole new ballgame!! > My lawyer argued that if they set these dates / mileages and i followed > the service plan to the letter, use > all (in my case) Toyota parts supplied and fitted by the main dealer, then > that made the toyota dealership totally responsible for all of the repairs > to my car when the cambelt snapped 10k earlier than it should have done!! > So i ended up getting all of my money back plus the costs!! > > Paul > > > "Stephen Poley" > wrote in message > ... >> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:30:10 GMT, "Domestos" > >> wrote: >> >>>> In fact, anyone who follows the change interval specified by any >>>> manufacturer is a fool, IMHO. I always change my belts somewhere >>>> between >>>> 50% and 75% of the quoted mileage - a £300 belt change is a lot cheaper >>>> than a new engine. >>> >>>I disagree, the change interval specified by the manufacturer should be >>>well >>>before the required time to change, else they are leaving themselves open >>>( or so you would think! - but they use the old trick of its a moving >>>part) >>>. If a belt needs to be changed before this guideline then the company is >>>at >>>fault as they have supplied a faulty part. It should last as quoted!!! >>> >>>If a buyer follows the handbook service intervals I see no reason why a >>>cambelt should not last at least the guideline mileage. Obviously this >>>should be open to interpritation... >>> >>>i.e. 74,000 miles or 3 years. Which ever comes first etc... >>> >>>Buying a new car should mean that you should not have to change anything >>>on >>>it in the first three years... i.e. they should have an unlimited mileage >>>warinty on all parts!!! >> >> What - even tyres? >> >> Seriously, I don't think it's sensible to expect manufacturers to >> guarantee all parts for the service interval. There is a sort of >> bell-curve for part life, and some parts will fail early. If we demanded >> guarantees for everything, manufacturers would respond by specifying >> much more frequent changes and we'd probably end up worse off. >> >> But for parts where failure means danger (brakes) or damage which goes >> well beyond the cost of a replacement part (cam-belt) then I think it is >> reasonable to demand guarantees. [1] And in those cases I think using >> the small claims court is an excellent idea. >> >> >> [1] Or alternatively a means by which an owner without special skills or >> equipment can check for wear/consumption regularly - as with tyres and >> oil. >> >> -- >> Stephen Poley > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Service Department Horror Stories | Me | Ford Mustang | 13 | October 13th 05 10:11 PM |
Repair Fraud? | basva | Technology | 65 | October 9th 05 11:26 PM |
Service | David A Smith | Alfa Romeo | 4 | October 19th 04 03:36 PM |
Alfa Customer service and probs | Duffy | Alfa Romeo | 2 | September 10th 04 03:22 PM |
Paying for new parts that aren't used | Darryl Minard | General | 56 | April 5th 04 05:25 AM |