Racing Legends cancelled.

Goy Larsen wrote:
>
> whooo wrote:
>
>>Not because I want to libel people and get away with it. Some people
>>wear hoods so they can get away with committing crime. I wear a hood to
>>keep my head warm. There's nothing wrong with wearing a hood to keep the
>>old head warm, is there?
>>
>>Let Ted come forward, like a man, make his allegation and let the West
>>boys decide how to proceed, I say. What's wrong with that suggestion?
>>
>>Well, according to you, the problem with that suggestion is that I don't
>>post under my real name!
>
>
> Are you seriously suggesting that he posts his personal information to a
> NG, especially after he offered to send it to your mail addy if you
> provided a working one ?
>
Yes, or withdraw his accusation.

snipped

> Yes, or withdraw his accusation.

ok, let me get this all straight. some one correct me if I'm wrong.

whooo wants redTed to contact west bros about his libel comments with his
real name etc, or put it all here in the ng under real name and email addy.

redTed refuses. not putting his private info in a public ng.

whooo says he'll pass the info on if redTed sends him an email.

redTed sends email. its an expired account.

as whooo doesn't provide a functional email addy so that redTed can pass the
info on privately, whooo expects redTed to put this info in a public ng.

also

whooo accuses redTed of hiding behind a pseudonym
ummm pot.....kettle....black


<shakes head, makes a coffee, goes back to a real life>


cheers

steve

Steve Whitty wrote:
> snipped
>
>
>>Yes, or withdraw his accusation.
>
>
> ok, let me get this all straight. some one correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> whooo wants redTed to contact west bros about his libel comments with his
> real name etc, or put it all here in the ng under real name and email addy.
>
> redTed refuses. not putting his private info in a public ng.
>
> whooo says he'll pass the info on if redTed sends him an email.
>
> redTed sends email. its an expired account.
>
> as whooo doesn't provide a functional email addy so that redTed can pass the
> info on privately, whooo expects redTed to put this info in a public ng.
>
> also
>
> whooo accuses redTed of hiding behind a pseudonym
> ummm pot.....kettle....black
>
But I'm not libelling people, am I. Do you think it shows good form to
libel people from behind a pseudonym?

> RedTed, you do realize who Gregor is, don't you?

Of course. He is the virtual physics chief of a project that hasn't
materialized yet.
So ?

redTed wrote:
>>RedTed, you do realize who Gregor is, don't you?
>
>
> Of course. He is the virtual physics chief of a project that hasn't
> materialized yet.
> So ?
>
>
What have you ever done for the SimRacing community?

"whooo" > wrote in message
...
> Steve Whitty wrote:
>> snipped
>>
>>
>>>Yes, or withdraw his accusation.
>>
>>
>> ok, let me get this all straight. some one correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> whooo wants redTed to contact west bros about his libel comments with
>> his real name etc, or put it all here in the ng under real name and email
>> addy.
>>
>> redTed refuses. not putting his private info in a public ng.
>>
>> whooo says he'll pass the info on if redTed sends him an email.
>>
>> redTed sends email. its an expired account.
>>
>> as whooo doesn't provide a functional email addy so that redTed can pass
>> the info on privately, whooo expects redTed to put this info in a public
>> ng.
>>
>> also
>>
>> whooo accuses redTed of hiding behind a pseudonym
>> ummm pot.....kettle....black
>>
> But I'm not libelling people, am I. Do you think it shows good form to
> libel people from behind a pseudonym?

I just find it hypocritical (Bruce is that spelt right ? ) of accusing
someone of hiding behind a pseudonym. Irrespective if you are libelling
someone or not, you are posting behind a fictional name. Therefore, you
lack credibility in your arguement.

don't ya just love a good debate

bedtime in my part of the world. will catch up with all this later.

cheers

steve

Steve Whitty wrote:
> "whooo" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Steve Whitty wrote:
>>
>>>snipped
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, or withdraw his accusation.
>>>
>>>
>>>ok, let me get this all straight. some one correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>>whooo wants redTed to contact west bros about his libel comments with
>>>his real name etc, or put it all here in the ng under real name and email
>>>addy.
>>>
>>> redTed refuses. not putting his private info in a public ng.
>>>
>>> whooo says he'll pass the info on if redTed sends him an email.
>>>
>>>redTed sends email. its an expired account.
>>>
>>>as whooo doesn't provide a functional email addy so that redTed can pass
>>>the info on privately, whooo expects redTed to put this info in a public
>>>ng.
>>>
>>>also
>>>
>>>whooo accuses redTed of hiding behind a pseudonym
>>>ummm pot.....kettle....black
>>>
>>
>>But I'm not libelling people, am I. Do you think it shows good form to
>>libel people from behind a pseudonym?
>
>
> I just find it hypocritical (Bruce is that spelt right ? ) of accusing
> someone of hiding behind a pseudonym. Irrespective if you are libelling
> someone or not, you are posting behind a fictional name. Therefore, you
> lack credibility in your arguement.

The question is: is it honourable to made libellous comments about
people from behind a pseudonym?

Racing Legends was cancelled in 2001?

whooo wrote:
>
> Goy Larsen wrote:
> >
> > Are you seriously suggesting that he posts his personal information to a
> > NG, especially after he offered to send it to your mail addy if you
> > provided a working one ?
> >
> Yes, or withdraw his accusation.

Just checking, well, he already tried to send you his info, your e-mail
isn't working, I'd say it's up to you to provide him a means to send you
his info, I'd never post my personal info in public because someone
hiding behind an anonymous name demanded that I did


Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"

"When two or more people are gathered together in my name,
they shall perform the Parrot Sketch..."

--Our Lord John Cleese--

>ok, let me get this all straight. some one correct me if I'm wrong.

yep I think you're pretty close.

And surprisingly other posts are lementing the loss of inteligent
discourse on r.a.s. lately, I guess they're not counting
"did-so/did-not" as debating.