Comparison between GTL & GTR

I understand both games are made by the same company. How do they compare?
Just a brief comparo will be necessary. I am unable to source GTR here in
NZ, but I'm interested in how they compare.
Is/Was GTR just an 'upgrade' of the mod for F1 2002?
Thanks.

--

RocketMan

Go with GTL. The improvements make a huge difference over GTR offline and
on.

I feel GTL resembles GTR on the physics side and rFactor on the graphics
side (obviously more detailed in both respects).

A decent combo for sure but GMotor1 GTR/GTL physics feel very dated compared
to rFactor.

GTR2 I would imagine will be full on GMotor2 instead of the half and half we
get with GTL.

Mitch

"RocketMan" > wrote in message
...
> I understand both games are made by the same company. How do they
> compare? Just a brief comparo will be necessary. I am unable to source GTR
> here in NZ, but I'm interested in how they compare.
> Is/Was GTR just an 'upgrade' of the mod for F1 2002?
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> RocketMan
>

RocketMan wrote:
> I understand both games are made by the same company. How do they compare?
> Just a brief comparo will be necessary. I am unable to source GTR here in
> NZ, but I'm interested in how they compare.
> Is/Was GTR just an 'upgrade' of the mod for F1 2002?
> Thanks.

The most striking difference iis the cars. GTR uses relatively recent
cars. They're fast, they handle well, and they're "edgy". Either
you're stuck to the track or you're spinning/off. The cars have many
setup adjustments possible. There is excellent telemetry. GTL uses
vintage cars. Slower all around, and they're soft and slide a lot.
Limited setup adjustments, no telemetry.

GTR is a substantial step above the earlier version. GTL is reputed to
be better online, but I don't know about that.