Which is correct???

How come they did't put 40th anniversary emblems on the new 05's? I would
have loved to see that on mine.....
"Recon_" > wrote in message
k.net...
> So, maybe all 04 owners with the 40th anniversary package should
> get some kind of rebate ... not holding my breath
>
> 04 GT Vert 40th
> Dark Grey Metalic
> "Dark Pony"
>
>
> "Dinsdale" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 22:37:14 -0800, "Gearhead-FMC" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >It is all about $$$. Back in those days, all new model years were sold
>> >around September of the previous year, i.e. 1970 models were sold in
>> >Aug/Sept of 1969, 1965 models were sold in Aug/Sept of 1964. The first
> year
>> >of the mustang was 1965. All those Yahoo that advertise the 19641/2 are
>> >boobs! Check the KBB Gold or other value registry. Mustang starts in
> 1965.
>> >
>> >Ford is just playing up the hype created by collectors that are trying
>> >to
>> >run prices up....constantly.
>> >
>> >2005 is the 40th year!
>>
>> They were hyping the 40th anniversary of the Mustang's April, 1964
>> introduction....and that happened to fall on the 2004 model.
>>
>> While I recognize the distinction of the "1964 1/2" Mustangs, I agree
>> that 1965 was the first model year, that makes 2005 the 41st model
>> year.
>>
>> Model years are a different than anniversary years. At the beginning
>> the former starts it's counter at 1, while the latter starts it's
>> counter at 0.
>>
>> So...while 2005 is the 41st model year it's also the 40th anniversary
>> of the first Mustang model year (1965) ...and what does all this
>> mean...2 years for folks to play with "40th anniversary".
>>
>> DP
>> Pics of the cars:
>> http://tinyurl.com/4fcsn
>
>

Stuart&Janet wrote:
> Get me the VIN and I'll tell you what it was titled as... StuK
>
>

>>So, what about our old 70 1/2 Falcon? I can't remember what year that
>>was titled. It was definately NOT a 1970 Falcon, and Ford did not make
>>a 1971 US Falcon (Aussie Falcons were still made).
>>
>>Rob
>
>

Good Idea! I think I still have the invoice here somewhere. I'm pretty
sure it was delivered in November or October 1969, so it looks like it's
going to be a 1970 registration. It was a completely different vehicle
than a 1970 Falcon, though.

Rob

Badges??? We don't need no stinking badges!!

--
Jim
Dark Shadow Grey '04 GT
"B2723m" > wrote in message
...
> The second half production '89s and first half production '90s had 25th
> anniversary badges...have the first, seen the second. If that holds true,
the
> early '05s should have badges. Any info on the other anniversary years?
>
> bradtx
>
>

I know, I had an early '89 GT without the badge. That "badge" was considered
a "mod" for early '89 owners! I never did add one to mine...
--
Mike
Silver 10th Anniversary Cobra Coupe
....

"B2723m" > wrote in message
...
> The second half production '89s and first half production '90s had 25th
> anniversary badges...have the first, seen the second. If that holds true,
the
> early '05s should have badges. Any info on the other anniversary years?
>
> bradtx
>
>

WraithCobra wrote:

> I know, I had an early '89 GT without the badge. That "badge" was considered
> a "mod" for early '89 owners! I never did add one to mine...



Mine has the "25 Years" badge. The guy that bought my car new and his
brother bought the last two 89 V8's on the lot.


--
YOU are the real piece of work in this post. I think you are
a couple of drumsticks short of a picnic there bud. - SVTKate