If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Problems putting power brakes on 67 Camaro
My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power
brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the booster? Thanks. - Luther |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
did he use a power brake master?? there is a difference
"lcifers" > wrote in message oups.com... > My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power > brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high > performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. > Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the > booster? > > Thanks. > > - Luther > |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
lcifers wrote:
> My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power > brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high > performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. > Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the > booster? > > Thanks. > > - Luther > Luther, first of all a high performance engine generally does not pull more vacuum than stock; a performance camshaft tends to lower vacuum at idle. Secondly, I imagine your brother's problem is that he probably bolted on a booster but did not change the pedal assembly; there are probably two holes in the brake pedal (one for manual brakes and one for power) or else he needs a pedal and maybe pushrod from a car with power brakes. I'd talk to someone who knows old Chevys to see exactly what you need to do. good luck, nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nate Nagel wrote: > lcifers wrote: > > > My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power > > brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high > > performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. > > Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the > > booster? > > > > Thanks. > > > > - Luther > > > > Luther, > > first of all a high performance engine generally does not pull more > vacuum than stock; a performance camshaft tends to lower vacuum at idle. > Secondly, I imagine your brother's problem is that he probably bolted > on a booster but did not change the pedal assembly; there are probably > two holes in the brake pedal (one for manual brakes and one for power) > or else he needs a pedal and maybe pushrod from a car with power brakes. > I'd talk to someone who knows old Chevys to see exactly what you need > to do. > > good luck, > > nate > > -- > replace "fly" with "com" to reply. > http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel OK, thanks. He's going to check that. Yes, it does have a power master cylinder. Thanks. - Luther |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is this why my 67 Plymouth losses most of its power brakes when backing it
up at low idle? It has a 318 and I did put a mild performance cam in it? What can I do or try to correct this? If I do not keep the idle up it gets a little hairy at times with no brakes. Not to mention dangerous! Greg "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message ... > lcifers wrote: > >> My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power >> brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high >> performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. >> Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the >> booster? >> >> Thanks. >> >> - Luther >> > > Luther, > > first of all a high performance engine generally does not pull more vacuum > than stock; a performance camshaft tends to lower vacuum at idle. > Secondly, I imagine your brother's problem is that he probably bolted on a > booster but did not change the pedal assembly; there are probably two > holes in the brake pedal (one for manual brakes and one for power) or else > he needs a pedal and maybe pushrod from a car with power brakes. I'd talk > to someone who knows old Chevys to see exactly what you need to do. > > good luck, > > nate > > -- > replace "fly" with "com" to reply. > http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
two words - vacuum accumulator
"pnsman64" > wrote in message ... > Is this why my 67 Plymouth losses most of its power brakes when backing it > up at low idle? It has a 318 and I did put a mild performance cam in it? > What can I do or try to correct this? If I do not keep the idle up it gets > a little hairy at times with no brakes. Not to mention dangerous! > Greg > > > "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message > ... > > lcifers wrote: > > > >> My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power > >> brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high > >> performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. > >> Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the > >> booster? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> - Luther > >> > > > > Luther, > > > > first of all a high performance engine generally does not pull more vacuum > > than stock; a performance camshaft tends to lower vacuum at idle. > > Secondly, I imagine your brother's problem is that he probably bolted on a > > booster but did not change the pedal assembly; there are probably two > > holes in the brake pedal (one for manual brakes and one for power) or else > > he needs a pedal and maybe pushrod from a car with power brakes. I'd talk > > to someone who knows old Chevys to see exactly what you need to do. > > > > good luck, > > > > nate > > > > -- > > replace "fly" with "com" to reply. > > http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel > > |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
And a check valve, of course.
good luck nate v8z wrote: > two words - vacuum accumulator > > "pnsman64" > wrote in message > ... > >>Is this why my 67 Plymouth losses most of its power brakes when backing it >>up at low idle? It has a 318 and I did put a mild performance cam in it? >>What can I do or try to correct this? If I do not keep the idle up it > > gets > >>a little hairy at times with no brakes. Not to mention dangerous! >>Greg >> >> >>"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message ... >> >>>lcifers wrote: >>> >>> >>>>My brother put a brake booster on his 67 Camaro to convert to power >>>>brakes, but the brakes are way too sensitive. the car has a high >>>>performance engine that probably pulls much more vacuum than stock. >>>>Could this be the problem? Is there a device to limit the vacuum to the >>>>booster? >>>> >>>>Thanks. >>>> >>>>- Luther >>>> >>> >>>Luther, >>> >>>first of all a high performance engine generally does not pull more > > vacuum > >>>than stock; a performance camshaft tends to lower vacuum at idle. >>>Secondly, I imagine your brother's problem is that he probably bolted on > > a > >>>booster but did not change the pedal assembly; there are probably two >>>holes in the brake pedal (one for manual brakes and one for power) or > > else > >>>he needs a pedal and maybe pushrod from a car with power brakes. I'd > > talk > >>>to someone who knows old Chevys to see exactly what you need to do. >>> >>>good luck, >>> >>>nate >>> >>>-- >>>replace "fly" with "com" to reply. >>>http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel >> >> > > -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 18th 04 05:15 AM |
A3 1.8T Quattro idling and power problems | Stuart | Audi | 1 | December 6th 04 11:17 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 2nd 04 05:19 AM |
Problems bleeding brakes | Richard Golding | VW air cooled | 3 | November 15th 04 03:55 PM |
Turning key kills power...until I step on brakes! | rocklob | Saturn | 1 | October 13th 04 12:20 AM |