If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Yet another documented case.... http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections prior to starting red light camera ticketing. <...> |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Brent P wrote:
> Yet another documented case.... > > http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp > > Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras > Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections > prior to starting red light camera ticketing. Sounds like a good idea. You red light runners bring this on yourself by insisting on accelerating when the light turns yellow even if you're 5 car lengths away!! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
On May 21, 12:05 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> wrote: > Brent P wrote: > > Yet another documented case.... > > >http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp > > > Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras > > Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections > > prior to starting red light camera ticketing. > > Sounds like a good idea. You red light runners bring this on yourself > by insisting on accelerating when the light turns yellow even if you're > 5 car lengths away!! Wow- you really CAN see the exact opposite of what's printed!! Your therapist regress you back far enough so you can see the faces of those you killed, yet? Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
On May 21, 12:05 pm, Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> wrote: > Brent P wrote: > > Yet another documented case.... > > >http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp > > > Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras > > Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections > > prior to starting red light camera ticketing. > > Sounds like a good idea. You red light runners bring this on yourself > by insisting on accelerating when the light turns yellow even if you're > 5 car lengths away!! If we're talking about a 55 MPH road, that would be the prudent thing to do, no? lessee... "5 car lengths" if you assume that a "car length" is 20 feet - that's 100 feet - shorter than most vehicles will stop from 55 MPH! At the other end of the spectrum, let's say that this hypothetical signal is on a 35 MPH road... stopping in 100 feet from 35 MPH assuming constant decel still works out to 13.2 feet per second per second or over 0.4G - which is still a sharper decel than the average person feels comfortable with. Now you may say to yourself, "but Nate, 20 feet is a large car, wouldn't an average car be closer to 17-18 feet in length these days?" Um, yeah, probably. Do the math and get back to me on how that affects the calculations. So please tell me again, how this is the public "bringing things on themselves" except by voting for dip**** representatives that support this bull****? Why don't you just shut the **** up until you know what the **** you're talking about? I swear, you must have aliens beaming stupid waves into your little brain, because I've never met anyone IRL that could be as stupid as you and still remember to breathe. nate |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Alas Nate, SADDAM (and it's many previous incarnations) has
continously refused to accept the fact that it's simply too stupid to live, and even more foolishly has ignored my quite reasonable recommendation that it join the Body World exhibit, where it's bone- headedness could be put to good use, where it could garner fame and reknown, and where it could really show off it's muscles... Anyway, does anyone have any website where all of this RLC trickery and chicanery is compiled in one spot, so whenever the stupid (or... greedy) area politicians start making their periodic noises about RLCs, I could simply e-mail the local papers an Letter to the Editor, complete with a single one stop shop webpage URL listing why in the real world RLCs are 'all about the money, nothing about the safety'. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
aSpeeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>Brent P wrote: >> Yet another documented case.... >> >> http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp >> >> Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras >> Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections >> prior to starting red light camera ticketing. > >Sounds like a good idea. You red light runners bring this on yourself >by insisting on accelerating when the light turns yellow even if you're >5 car lengths away!! Only because dullard LLBers prevent them from making it through the signals safely and efficiently. Thank God Darwin takes care of 'em all.... -- We're all here because we're not all there. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver > wrote in
: > aSpeeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: >>Brent P wrote: >>> Yet another documented case.... >>> >>> http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/17/1759.asp >>> >>> Missouri: City Lowers Yellow Light Time Before Installing Cameras >>> Springfield, Missouri cuts the yellow time at over 100 intersections >>> prior to starting red light camera ticketing. >> >>Sounds like a good idea. Yeah,so much for following standard practices. >>You red light runners bring this on yourself >>by insisting on accelerating when the light turns yellow even if you're >>5 car lengths away!! > > Only because dullard LLBers SLOTHs.Clueless dawdlers. No such thing as a LLBer on city streets. > prevent them from making it through the > signals safely and efficiently. > > Thank God Darwin takes care of 'em all.... > > Not enough of them. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Jim Yanik wrote:
>> Only because dullard LLBers > >SLOTHs.Clueless dawdlers. No such thing as a LLBer on city streets. How 'bout parkers? You have those where you live? I'm not certain if I never really though enough about them to remember them previously, or if their frequency is increasing. But for some reason or another, it appears we're developing an epidemic of them here. Hmm, could explain of why we are ahead of last year's already stellar performance in satisfying the Darwin Device. >> prevent them from making it through the >> signals safely and efficiently. >> >> Thank God Darwin takes care of 'em all.... >> >> > >Not enough of them. Amen. -- We're all here because we're not all there. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver > wrote in
: > Jim Yanik wrote: >>> Only because dullard LLBers >> >>SLOTHs.Clueless dawdlers. No such thing as a LLBer on city streets. > > How 'bout parkers? Do you mean those who are sightseeing when the light changes? they sit there while the light is green,looking everwhere except at the light. I always say to myself "well,it's not going to get any greener...". > You have those where you live? I'm not certain if I > never really though enough about them to remember them previously, or > if their frequency is increasing. But for some reason or another, it > appears we're developing an epidemic of them here. Hmm, could explain > of why we are ahead of last year's already stellar performance in > satisfying the Darwin Device. > >>> prevent them from making it through the >>> signals safely and efficiently. >>> >>> Thank God Darwin takes care of 'em all.... >>> >>> >> >>Not enough of them. > > Amen. > > -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Another city caught shortening yellows for RLCs.
Jim Yanik wrote:
>Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver > wrote in : > >> Jim Yanik wrote: >>>> Only because dullard LLBers >>> >>>SLOTHs.Clueless dawdlers. No such thing as a LLBer on city streets. >> >> How 'bout parkers? > >Do you mean those who are sightseeing when the light changes? they sit >there while the light is green,looking everwhere except at the light. Nah, those have been fairly constant throughout my life. I'm talking about the geniuses, who, for reasons unknown to me, merely stop in the middle of a road as if it were a parking lot. Sometimes they do this as part of a traffic maneuver, other times it looks like they do this to just take a break from the task of driving. Over the last two seeks, I've seen at least four occurrences of this, including one 'lady' in a minivan who felt like it was her right to pull out and park in front of two lanes of traffic approaching from her left, while she was waiting for the two lanes of traffic from the right to clear. MFFY bitch brought two lanes of traffic on one of my 'burg's main routes to a stop. Stupid bitch probably thinks she's a safe driver because she doesn't speed. I am SO glad that stupid people get killed on the roads. >I always say to myself "well,it's not going to get any greener...". That's been a favorite of mine for years, too. :-) -- We're all here because we're not all there. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iowa moves to ban RLCs. | Brent P[_1_] | Driving | 16 | April 12th 07 04:15 PM |
A serious legal blow to RLCs | Brent P[_1_] | Driving | 0 | April 6th 07 11:03 PM |
Another city caught trying to install RLCs at substandard intersections | Brent P[_1_] | Driving | 36 | March 9th 07 04:56 PM |
It's about the revenue... RLCs | Brent P[_1_] | Driving | 6 | March 1st 07 03:52 AM |
RLCs Can Be a Good Thing | Arif Khokar | Driving | 55 | March 5th 05 02:37 AM |