If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote: >Another rendering. Supposedly this one is close. > >I like the back view. The front view, not so much... it's a little >too busy. > >Your thoughts? > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...s-design-cues/ > >Patrick ICK. Ick on the Jaguar too. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
In article >,
Ashton Crusher > wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), " > > wrote: > > >Another rendering. Supposedly this one is close. > > > >I like the back view. The front view, not so much... it's a little > >too busy. > > > >Your thoughts? > > > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ered-with-evos > >-design-cues/ > > > >Patrick > > > ICK. Ick on the Jaguar too. Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the better looking renderings so far. It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro. I didn't check the jag. /grin -- For all you know this message was... Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
On May 14, 11:47*pm, twk > wrote:
> In article >, > *Ashton Crusher > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), " > > > wrote: > > > >Another rendering. *Supposedly this one is close. > > > >I like the back view. *The front view, not so much... it's a little > > >too busy. > > > >Your thoughts? > > > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ang-rendered-w.... > > >-design-cues/ > > > >Patrick > > > ICK. *Ick on the Jaguar too. > > Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the > better looking renderings so far. > It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro. > > I didn't check the jag. * /grin > > -- > For all you know this message was... > Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. I'm kind of worried that they are heading into Jap territory again, with everything rounded. The Mustang MUST have some angularity in the body. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT), RichA >
wrote: >On May 14, 11:47*pm, twk > wrote: >> In article >, >> *Ashton Crusher > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), " >> > > wrote: >> >> > >Another rendering. *Supposedly this one is close. >> >> > >I like the back view. *The front view, not so much... it's a little >> > >too busy. >> >> > >Your thoughts? >> >> > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ang-rendered-w... >> > >-design-cues/ >> >> > >Patrick >> >> > ICK. *Ick on the Jaguar too. >> >> Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the >> better looking renderings so far. >> It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro. >> >> I didn't check the jag. * /grin >> >> -- >> For all you know this message was... >> Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. > >I'm kind of worried that they are heading into Jap territory again, >with everything rounded. The Mustang MUST have some angularity in the >body. Exactly, It's too ricer. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
In article >,
Ashton Crusher > wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT), RichA > > wrote: > > >On May 14, 11:47*pm, twk > wrote: > >> In article >, > >> *Ashton Crusher > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), " > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >Another rendering. *Supposedly this one is close. > >> > >> > >I like the back view. *The front view, not so much... it's a little > >> > >too busy. > >> > >> > >Your thoughts? > >> > >> > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ang-rendered-w... > >> > >-design-cues/ > >> > >> > >Patrick > >> > >> > ICK. *Ick on the Jaguar too. > >> > >> Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the > >> better looking renderings so far. > >> It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro. > >> > >> I didn't check the jag. * /grin > >> > >> -- > >> For all you know this message was... > >> Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. > > > >I'm kind of worried that they are heading into Jap territory again, > >with everything rounded. The Mustang MUST have some angularity in the > >body. > > > Exactly, It's too ricer. You both made me go back for a second look. It's still the best "guess" the artist has come up with so far, but yeah It does have some ricer qualities. I'm not liking it as much now. I also noticed the visibility out the rear might suck on that latest rendering. I wouldn't want to back into a parking space. Where do these people that "render" pictures of new cars and such, get their ideas from? This latest picture is based on what? -- For all you know this message was... Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is This Our 2015 Mustang?
"twk" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Ashton Crusher > wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 May 2012 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT), RichA > >> wrote: >> >> >On May 14, 11:47 pm, twk > wrote: >> >> In article >, >> >> Ashton Crusher > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Wed, 9 May 2012 16:55:24 -0700 (PDT), " >> >> > > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >Another rendering. Supposedly this one is close. >> >> >> >> > >I like the back view. The front view, not so much... it's a little >> >> > >too busy. >> >> >> >> > >Your thoughts? >> >> >> >> > >http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...ang-rendered-w... >> >> > >-design-cues/ >> >> >> >> > >Patrick >> >> >> >> > ICK. Ick on the Jaguar too. >> >> >> >> Like one of the comments on that page, I agree, that is one of the >> >> better looking renderings so far. >> >> It looks like a mustang, not like a camaro. >> >> >> >> I didn't check the jag. /grin >> >> >> >> -- >> >> For all you know this message was... >> >> Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. >> > >> >I'm kind of worried that they are heading into Jap territory again, >> >with everything rounded. The Mustang MUST have some angularity in the >> >body. >> >> >> Exactly, It's too ricer. > > You both made me go back for a second look. It's still the best "guess" > the artist has come up with so far, but yeah It does have some ricer > qualities. I'm not liking it as much now. I also noticed the visibility > out the rear might suck on that latest rendering. I wouldn't want to > back into a parking space. > > Where do these people that "render" pictures of new cars and such, get > their ideas from? This latest picture is based on what? > > -- > For all you know this message was... > Sent via an exclusive network, on a snobby portable computing device. It's in the name of the link - EVOS. When I first saw the Jaguar commercial with the three cars "playing," I thought the blue one looked very Mustang-like. Interesting that some see it the other way 'round - that the Mustang now looks Jaguarish. Personally, I like it. You can keep your angularity. Hell, if you like boxy so much, I have a '93 GT 5.0 convertible that you can buy for cheap. I know that some want the Mustang to always look like something out of the late 60s. I keep looking to the future and think about what "could be" the new Mustang. This rendering (while still a fantasy) is much more like it. dwight |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2015 Mustang Proposals | [email protected][_2_] | Ford Mustang | 3 | January 5th 12 06:03 PM |
32.7 million electric cars by 2015 | lyon_wonder | Driving | 28 | March 18th 09 08:50 PM |
square wheels makes a fool of it's self again. 2015 | SupermanHughesFighter of POSs 24Wimp & SWimp | Auto Photos | 0 | January 13th 08 04:37 AM |
Wait until 2015 ! | Karl-Hugo Weesberg | 4x4 | 4 | October 29th 04 04:25 PM |