"My daughter had a right to be on the road that night," Innis said. "He didn't."

Sam A. Kersh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:47:24 -0500, gringo > wrote:
>
>
>> Alan Moore wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:32:51 -0500, gringo > wrote:
>>>
>
>
>>> They did figure out his problem eventually.
>>>
>>> http://www.truckerphoto.com/Bush%20w...own%20book.jpg
>>>
>>> Al Moore
>>> DoD 734
>>>
>>>
>> LOL. He is a stupid ****, ain't he.
>>
>
> Never heard of Photoshop, have you, tonto?
>
>
>

The question is: George is a stupid ****, isn't he? Only one who is
either a moron or willfully ignorant would doubt that.

--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary, 1983



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999

RM v2.0 wrote:
>>>> Why do research for one who is too ****ing stupid to understand it. Take
>>>> reading lessons. George says that he larned a lot plodding through "My
>>>> Pet Goat" and the third graders who helped him with the big words.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> They did figure out his problem eventually.
>>>
>>> http://www.truckerphoto.com/Bush%20w...own%20book.jpg
>>>
>>> Al Moore
>>> DoD 734
>>>
>>>
>> LOL. He is a stupid ****, ain't he.
>> --
>>
> Not as stupid as someone who believes that photo! Do you really think the
> photographer would have allowed that?
>
>
>
Right. He's going to jump up and correct the president of the US!
Hell, he's done even stupider things. Shall I produce a list of his
more famous bushisms? He commits a few more every day, you know--so
many, in fact, that the "librul" Press has stopped reporting them. BTW,
it's alright for you Conservatives to admit George is both a jerk and an
idiot--he ain't no Consrvative, he's a goddamn one-world-government
Neo-Con. He'll do anything to anyone to line his crime family's pockets.

--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary, 1983



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999

Sam A. Kersh wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:32:51 -0500, gringo > wrote:
>
>
>> You're too ****ing stupid to breathe without help. There is ZERO
>> documentation proving that Saddam Hussein ever had possession of
>> weapons-grade uranium or the materials for making same.
>>
>
> gringo, you're even dumber than you originally appear. Check here or
> find the Butler Report itself.
>
> http://www.factcheck.org/article222.html
>
> gringo is a typical Democrat whiner; too freaking stupid to be bothered
> to find the facts; gets all his info from the Democratic Undergraound.
>
> What a putz.
>
>
>

Sammie, sammie. You have to ask open-end questions in search engines to
get open, honest answers.
The so-called WMDs discovered were not usable to any degree; they had
been lying about in junk piles since 1993 or earlier.



http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/01/12/wmd.search/

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0413-02.htm

Updated: 8:24 p.m. CT April 25, 2005

WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA's top weapons inspector in Iraq
said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has "gone as
far as feasible" and has found nothing, closing an investigation into
the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the
2003 invasion.

"After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the
WMD-related detainees has been exhausted," wrote Charles Duelfer, head
of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued
last fall.

"As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible."


The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine
whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of
meticulously combing through the country, here's what the
administration's own inspectors reported
<http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm>:

*While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its
undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible
Indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions
thereafter*, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad's desire to see
sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force
against it should WMD be discovered.


--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary, 1983



"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999

"gringo" > wrote in message
...
> RM v2.0 wrote:
>>>>> Why do research for one who is too ****ing stupid to understand it.
>>>>> Take reading lessons. George says that he larned a lot plodding
>>>>> through "My Pet Goat" and the third graders who helped him with the
>>>>> big words.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> They did figure out his problem eventually.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.truckerphoto.com/Bush%20w...own%20book.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Al Moore
>>>> DoD 734
>>>>
>>>>
>>> LOL. He is a stupid ****, ain't he.
>>> --
>>>
>> Not as stupid as someone who believes that photo! Do you really think the
>> photographer would have allowed that?
>>
>>
> Right. He's going to jump up and correct the president of the US! Hell,
> he's done even stupider things. Shall I produce a list of his more famous
> bushisms? He commits a few more every day, you know--so many, in fact,
> that the "librul" Press has stopped reporting them. BTW, it's alright for
> you Conservatives to admit George is both a jerk and an idiot--he ain't no
> Consrvative, he's a goddamn one-world-government Neo-Con. He'll do
> anything to anyone to line his crime family's pockets.
>

I would think he would since thats his job. Thats not exaclty an easy job to
get and probably pays damn well. No harm in tactfully saying "Excuse me sir,
someone handed the book to you upside down". Its not like he was actually
reading it to notice, it was more of a prop. Would be better than getting
fired for being quiet and making him look the fool. I agree that he isnt a
conservative and we could do better but given our 2 choices I definitely
prefer Bush to Kerry. Just because a person cant speak well in public hardly
qualifies him as an idiot. I guess that make Stephen Hawking an utter moron.

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:53:13 GMT, Stephan Rothstein
> wrote:

>gringo wrote:
>> The war is legal and honorable *for the soldiers* who are doing the
>> fighting and dying. It is dishonorable for the nation--because most of
>> us sat mute while Bush lied us into it.
>
>I am not as sure as you that we sat quietly by or that Bush lied to us
>about it. I thought he was very clear about why we were there. I
>disagreed with his reasoning, but I have yet to find any evidence of a
>lie. And I define lie as any deliberate attempt to mislead me, not just
>as a false statement.

And there really were no false statements either. The biggest lie the
media attempts to push on us was that there were no WMD, which has
been proven to be a media lie.

>> Popeye, think about something. I trained 6 weeks in basic and
>> another 10 weeks in AIT and the US Army considered me fully trained to
>> fight America's battles. I assume your story is similar? Twenty weeks
>> from standing on a corner to trained soldier. We've been training
>> Iraqis going on four years to fight their own battles, and they still
>> can't make their own camps safe from looters.
>
>If this is the best example of your thinking ability, it is very clear
>that the Army was mistaken about you. You are comparing training an
>individual soldier with an established infrastructure to trying to
>establish the infrastructure and train the soldiers at the same time.
>Consider how many years it took to get the NCO's trained to teach you,
>and ask yourself how long we can expect it to take to train the NCO's in
>Iraq. And that is without the officers and higher ranking NCO's to
>consider, let alone the establishing of the rest of the infrastructure.

It is also more liberal bull****. The FACT is that there are only 6
small areas in Iraq where any conflict remains. There are a lot of
deaths in those areas, but the whole frickin rest of the country is
more peaceful than the majority of the US.

How many Americans die every day from random violence?

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:42:57 GMT, Stephan Rothstein
> wrote:

>> I thought that GWB's months and months of always saying the words
>> "terrorist" and "Saddam" in the same sentence was deliberately
>> misleading.
>
>I hear an awful lot of people who say that, but I have to be honest and
>say I never heard him allege anything about terrorism and Hussein. I do
>remember him claiming Hussein was in violation of prior treaties and in
>possession of banned weaponry and that this was the reason we should invade.
>
>You had to be paying attention at the time, as many of the news media
>were not and did help mislead people into thinking Hussein was part of
>the war on terrorism, but I cannot blame poor reporting on him or his
>administration.

They were paying attention, but as usual, they lied to the public to
make it seem like Bush was.

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:17:54 GMT, Stephan Rothstein
> wrote:

>> “Documents that purportedly showed Iraqi officials shopping for uranium
>> in Africa two years ago were deemed "not authentic" after careful
>> scrutiny by U.N. and independent experts, Mohamed ElBaradei, director
>> general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told the U.N.
>> Security Council.”/
>>
>> And the Administration’s response?
>>
>> /"’We fell for it,’ said one U.S. official who reviewed the documents."/
>
>This proves that Bush did not lie. He may have been suckered by someone
>else, but he did not lie, as per my earlier definition of knowingly
>trying to mislead us. Being given false information, believing it, and
>then relying on it and repeating it is not a lie, especially if you
>admit you were taken in by false information when you find out it was false.

And who appointed the CIA director? clinton. Gee, I wonder if tenet
lied to Bush in order to help the dimocrats that appointed him.'

Bush's mistake - allowing a single lying dimocrat to stay.

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:
> >
>>
> And he won't even get 14 years. Maybe a couple. The criminal coddling
> in america is just unbelievable. I trust you know the story of laura
> bush

Nahhh....that's a new one

But, with that nickname, I'm guessing you know ALL about it though.....
who would name themselves after an accident? sheesh....


--

Becky

gringo wrote:
> Sam A. Kersh wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:47:24 -0500, gringo > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Alan Moore wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:32:51 -0500, gringo > wrote:
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>> They did figure out his problem eventually.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.truckerphoto.com/Bush%20w...own%20book.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Al Moore
>>>> DoD 734
>>>>
>>> LOL. He is a stupid ****, ain't he.
>>
>> Never heard of Photoshop, have you, tonto?
>>
>>
>>
>
> The question is: George is a stupid ****, isn't he? Only one who is
> either a moron or willfully ignorant would doubt that.
>

I doubt that anyone who can get an MBA from Harvard is a "stupid ****".
I also doubt that anyone who could win the office of president is a
"stupid ****". Even further, I doubt that anyone who could do half the
things you have accused him of and get away with it could be a "stupid
****".

In other words, the only stupid **** I can see is anyone who thinks Bush
is stupid.

Steve Rothstein

DTJ wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:17:54 GMT, Stephan Rothstein
> > wrote:
>
>>> “Documents that purportedly showed Iraqi officials shopping for uranium
>>> in Africa two years ago were deemed "not authentic" after careful
>>> scrutiny by U.N. and independent experts, Mohamed ElBaradei, director
>>> general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told the U.N.
>>> Security Council.”/
>>>
>>> And the Administration’s response?
>>>
>>> /"’We fell for it,’ said one U.S. official who reviewed the documents."/
>> This proves that Bush did not lie. He may have been suckered by someone
>> else, but he did not lie, as per my earlier definition of knowingly
>> trying to mislead us. Being given false information, believing it, and
>> then relying on it and repeating it is not a lie, especially if you
>> admit you were taken in by false information when you find out it was false.
>
> And who appointed the CIA director? clinton. Gee, I wonder if tenet
> lied to Bush in order to help the dimocrats that appointed him.'
>
> Bush's mistake - allowing a single lying dimocrat to stay.

Yep. I always thought he was being very naive in doing so. He did this
because he got away with it in Texas. The reason he could get away with
it in Texas was that most of the Republicans had been democrats and most
of the Democrats really had Republican beliefs and it was a Texas
tradition until at least the mid 70's to be straight Democrat, as a
result of the Reconstruction Era. By thinking it would apply at the
national level, Bush was very naive.

Steve Rothstein