If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative
consequences? I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to pay premium gas prices. Thanks. fritzel67 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
91 octane is recommended, not required, with the normally aspirated
engine. The computer will sense the knock and set the timing advance accordingly. You will have less power, but if you drive with a light foot you may not be able to tell the difference. However, you want to buy a sports car. I assume that you want to be able to get the most power out of it and the Miata does not have a whole lot of that. The higher octane will give you the maximum power the car can produce. With a 12.7 US Gallon tank, you are talking about a 10-11 gallon for a full fillup. Thats 2.00 more for premium for every 250 miles of travel. (or about 100.00 per year if you drive 12000 miles and get a crappy 24 mpg On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:07:09 -0600, wrote: >Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative >consequences? > >I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to >pay premium gas prices. > >Thanks. > >fritzel67 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
> wrote in message ... > Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative > consequences? > > I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to > pay premium gas prices. > > Thanks. > > fritzel67 Depends on the year and model. My '99 uses 87 octane. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
Correct, it's dependant on the year, the NA cars all ran on regular unl
(87oct) and my 99 also does. Hopefully someone will chime in here and tell you which year they changed that. M.Caterra has a good point that you're talking about a couple hundred bucks spread out over a year if you drive 12k. There's also a good chance that you'll get better than 24 mpg also. Chris 99BBB "Chas Hurst" > wrote in message ... > > > wrote in message > ... >> Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative >> consequences? >> >> I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to >> pay premium gas prices. >> >> Thanks. >> >> fritzel67 > > Depends on the year and model. My '99 uses 87 octane. > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
In 2001 the compression was raised as was the octane requirement. I b'lieve
91 is the number, but I'm not sure. Then there is the MazdaSpeed turbo model and I have no idea of its' fuel requirements. "Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote in message ... > Correct, it's dependant on the year, the NA cars all ran on regular unl > (87oct) and my 99 also does. Hopefully someone will chime in here and tell > you which year they changed that. > > M.Caterra has a good point that you're talking about a couple hundred > bucks spread out over a year if you drive 12k. There's also a good chance > that you'll get better than 24 mpg also. > > Chris > 99BBB > > "Chas Hurst" > wrote in message > ... >> >> > wrote in message >> ... >>> Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative >>> consequences? >>> >>> I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to >>> pay premium gas prices. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> fritzel67 >> >> Depends on the year and model. My '99 uses 87 octane. >> > > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
I think the also introduced the variable valve timing in 01.
The Mazdaspeed turbo drops the compression to 9:1 and has no variable valve timing. It requires 91 octane. On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:11:26 -0500, "Chas Hurst" > wrote: >In 2001 the compression was raised as was the octane requirement. I b'lieve >91 is the number, but I'm not sure. Then there is the MazdaSpeed turbo model >and I have no idea of its' fuel requirements. > > >"Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote in message .. . >> Correct, it's dependant on the year, the NA cars all ran on regular unl >> (87oct) and my 99 also does. Hopefully someone will chime in here and tell >> you which year they changed that. >> >> M.Caterra has a good point that you're talking about a couple hundred >> bucks spread out over a year if you drive 12k. There's also a good chance >> that you'll get better than 24 mpg also. >> >> Chris >> 99BBB >> >> "Chas Hurst" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative >>>> consequences? >>>> >>>> I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to >>>> pay premium gas prices. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> fritzel67 >>> >>> Depends on the year and model. My '99 uses 87 octane. >>> >> >> > |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
> wrote in message ... > Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative > consequences? > > I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to > pay premium gas prices. > > Thanks. > > fritzel67 My stock '96 has alway pinged on 87, so I've used 89. I know others have not found that necessary. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
It is easy to readjust the timing on a '96. It is set at 10 degrees from the
factory and won't ping on 87. It is probably adjusted for 16 degrees or more. Many of the owners of M1 1.8 motors have readjusted the timing to 14 degrees to get a little more low end. > > My stock '96 has alway pinged on 87, so I've used 89. I know others have > not found that necessary. > |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
That's not just on 1.8's, it was a lifesaver in my 92, 1.6 !
Chris 99BBB "lgadbois" > wrote in message link.net... > It is easy to readjust the timing on a '96. It is set at 10 degrees from > the factory and won't ping on 87. It is probably adjusted for 16 degrees > or more. Many of the owners of M1 1.8 motors have readjusted the timing to > 14 degrees to get a little more low end. > > >> >> My stock '96 has alway pinged on 87, so I've used 89. I know others have >> not found that necessary. >> > > |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Premium Fuel?
"Chas Hurst" > wrote:
>In 2001 the compression was raised as was the octane requirement. I b'lieve >91 is the number, but I'm not sure. The specification for my 2006 is 91, though lower can be used at reduced power and increased knock. Going below 87 is apparently a very bad idea. I just put in 93. Leon > Then there is the MazdaSpeed turbo model >and I have no idea of its' fuel requirements. > > >"Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote in message .. . >> Correct, it's dependant on the year, the NA cars all ran on regular unl >> (87oct) and my 99 also does. Hopefully someone will chime in here and tell >> you which year they changed that. >> >> M.Caterra has a good point that you're talking about a couple hundred >> bucks spread out over a year if you drive 12k. There's also a good chance >> that you'll get better than 24 mpg also. >> >> Chris >> 99BBB >> >> "Chas Hurst" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> Is it possible to run Miata's on regular fuel with no negative >>>> consequences? >>>> >>>> I'm in the market for a used Miata, but am concerned about having to >>>> pay premium gas prices. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> fritzel67 >>> >>> Depends on the year and model. My '99 uses 87 octane. >>> >> >> > -- Leon van Dommelen Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .) http://www.dommelen.net/miata EXIT THE INTERSTATES (Jamie Jensen) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4200 miles in six days in a C6 - fuel use notes for Dad | Vandervecken | Corvette | 9 | December 7th 05 10:43 PM |
L98: starts, but won't keep running. | Dave Gee | Corvette | 15 | October 22nd 05 08:43 PM |
98 concorde starting problems | xmirage2kx | Chrysler | 90 | August 21st 05 04:32 AM |
Failed Smog Check 1981 Trans AM | TheSmogTech | Technology | 0 | January 30th 05 04:16 PM |
In-the-tank fuel pumps cause death and destruction | Silver Surfer | Chrysler | 293 | November 7th 04 03:41 PM |