If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
JP Roberts wrote: > I'm perfectly immune to any criticism coming from individuals like you Obviously not, because you keep responding. Just because I am honest enough to be able to call you oatmeal-for-brains doesn't mean that I'm not educated as well. After all, ill-mannered simpletons such as yourself usually do not understand logic, reason or politeness. So blunt truth in words with few syllables must be used. It's too bad you can't understand the physics of what Mr. Smith told you. Then you wouldn't be so angry with me for pointing out your shortcomings. Have I written this in words too large for you to comprehend? E.P. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
The only one who is totally at odds with logic here is you, but that doesn't
surprise me at all, given your poor record and credibility. Those who call truth their opinions are totally blind of what truth really is. I can perfectly understand more phyisics that you ever would, but sometimes theory doesn't meet practice, and the fact that you want to flatter Smith here will not gain you any points. What you completely fail to understand is how short-minded your logic is. Your words are clearly below anyone's dignity so I will refuse to answer any more of your ill-bred comments. The fact that you keep interfering with every thread taking it totally out of context every time and taking every little opportunity to pick on my every comment says it all about you and your poor education. You must be a very frustrated little piece of a man to show such poor behaviour, Mr GcmsShhhttyGdamGemischtChemist. Oh, God, what a preposterous username you have. Do I need more proof? LOL And let me take this opportunity to publicly state I will not be replying to any more of your ill-bred spurious comments, even if you keep insulting everyone in this very honourable newsgroup. > understand logic, reason or politeness. So blunt truth in words with > few syllables must be used. > It's too bad you can't understand the physics of what Mr. Smith told > you. Then you wouldn't be so angry with me for pointing out your > shortcomings. > > Have I written this in words too large for you to comprehend? > > E.P. > |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
The message >
from Mike Smith > contains these words: > Not true. Higher-impedance loads are easier to drive for a solid-state > amp, not harder. True, but of course as the impedance rises the voltage required to attain the same output also rises. Given you've only got a 12v supply available things can get a little tricky with 8R speakers. -- Skipweasel. Ivor Cutler - "Never knowingly understood." |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
JP Roberts wrote: > The only one who is totally at odds with logic here is you, but that doesn't > surprise me at all, given your poor record and credibility. Lack of credibility with you? Heh. Lack of credibility with an anti-Audi whiner is a badge of honor. > Those who call truth their opinions are totally blind of what truth really > is. I agree. Good thing that I've never done that. You, on the other hand... > I can perfectly understand more phyisics that you ever would Your demonstration of that "opinion" in this thread points more toward the actual "truth" of the situation. Flatter Smith? He's right, and you're wrong. No flattery, just a plain acknowledgement of the truth. That'd be the real "truth," not your opinion dressed up as the truth. > What you completely fail to understand is how short-minded your logic is. Logic is logic. I realize it interferes with your self-pitying about owning an Audi that actually required some work. Next time, buy a car that doesn't require any repairs - problem solved! > Your words are clearly below anyone's dignity so I will refuse to answer any > more of your ill-bred comments. And yet, here you are, doing your best to get your digs in. You can't *wait* to come in and trade barbs, just like the impolite oaf that you are. Then you complain because someone actually returns fire. Hypocrite. > The fact that you keep interfering with every thread taking it totally out > of context every time and taking every little opportunity to pick on my > every comment says it all about you and your poor education. No, it shows how little I like ill-mannered folks such as yourself. Got any more gems of logic there? LOL. > You must be a very frustrated little piece of a man to show such poor > behaviour, Mr GcmsShhhttyGdamGemischtChemist. Oh, God, what a preposterous > username you have. Do I need more proof? LOL And here you are, slinging mud. The irony is perfect. Did you even think before you decided to have diarrhea at the keyboard? > And let me take this opportunity to publicly state I will not be replying to > any more of your ill-bred spurious comments, even if you keep insulting > everyone in this very honourable newsgroup. You calling me ill-bred is hilarious. I'm sure your parents would be quite proud of the lout they unleashed on the world. Oddly, I don't insult anyone be you - do you imagine yourself to be "the newsgroup?" That's pretty arrogant. Not surprising at all from you. No, I think I'll continue to point out your whinyness and lack of logical thought. How you respond is your choice, of course. Stick to the facts, oatmeal-for-brains, and you won't ever see me post in response to you. Offer idiotic opinions unsupported by facts, and I'll be there to correct you. E.P. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Guy King wrote:
> The message > > from Mike Smith > contains these words: > > >>Not true. Higher-impedance loads are easier to drive for a solid-state >>amp, not harder. > > > True, but of course as the impedance rises the voltage required to > attain the same output also rises. Given you've only got a 12v supply > available things can get a little tricky with 8R speakers. Modern amps with switching power supplies can "chop" the signal at high frequency and increase the available voltage. Only relatively low powered amps use a 12V supply. Think about it; P = V^2/R. If V is 12V, and R is 2Ohm, the most power you could ever get would be 72W, for 4Ohm speakers only 36W. Obviously higher supply voltages are being used in higher-power amps. -- Mike Smith |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
The message >
from Mike Smith > contains these words: > Obviously higher supply voltages are being used in > higher-power amps. Yes, I didn't think about it, having never had need for more than a few watts myself. I've built step up voltage convertors before to charge higher voltage batteries than a 12V feed will allow. -- Skipweasel. Ivor Cutler - "Never knowingly understood." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
YOU CAN'T DRIVE TOO SLOW | Laura Bush murdered her boy friend | Driving | 93 | April 21st 05 10:34 AM |
Questions about 1999 CRV Sound System | jj | Honda | 1 | March 30th 05 05:18 AM |
Infinity Sound System | hachiroku | Dodge | 3 | February 18th 05 04:31 PM |
Monster Sound System? | [email protected] | Jeep | 16 | January 7th 05 02:31 PM |
1990 V8 Sound system | S William Mote | Audi | 3 | November 6th 04 05:24 PM |