A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » BMW
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

old 325i



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 24th 13, 01:17 AM posted to alt.autos.bmw
Scott Dorsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,914
Default old 325i

It is with great sadness that I find that I will have to be replacing my
E28 after many years as a daily driver, racking up 340,000 miles. There
are frame rust problems that just aren't worth dealing with.

My mechanic has offered to sell me a 1987 325i that looks nearly new,
not a spot of rust anywhere and all the body undercoating looks perfect.
It was owned by someone he trusted who only racked up 120,000 miles in all
that time.

Any comments on those cars? I recall them as being problematic when they
were new and I am generally terrified at the notion of having a timing
belt, but he's willing to guarantee it and sell it for less than it would
sell as a parts car. And it feels like a fun car to drive, maybe more fun
than the 535i was.

I expect all the rubber parts to fail within six months as I start commuting
daily in it, but I can deal with that.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
Ads
  #3  
Old October 24th 13, 05:15 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
R. Mark Clayton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 778
Default old 325i


"Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message
...
> It is with great sadness that I find that I will have to be replacing my
> E28 after many years as a daily driver, racking up 340,000 miles. There
> are frame rust problems that just aren't worth dealing with.
>
> My mechanic has offered to sell me a 1987 325i that looks nearly new,
> not a spot of rust anywhere and all the body undercoating looks perfect.
> It was owned by someone he trusted who only racked up 120,000 miles in all
> that time.
>
> Any comments on those cars? I recall them as being problematic when they
> were new and I am generally terrified at the notion of having a timing
> belt, but he's willing to guarantee it and sell it for less than it would
> sell as a parts car. And it feels like a fun car to drive, maybe more fun
> than the 535i was.


The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.

If it is a manual, well maintained and cheap then it could be enjoyable
motoring for a while anyway. If auto, neglected or costly then walk away.

Realistically you would probably be better off buying a seven / several year
old 5 series depending on your budget.

Not sure where the 535i comes into this - I drove a new M535i in 1987 - it
was a bit of a beast!

>
> I expect all the rubber parts to fail within six months as I start
> commuting
> daily in it, but I can deal with that.
> --scott
>
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."



  #4  
Old October 24th 13, 05:47 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
Scott Dorsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,914
Default old 325i

Gordon Shumway > wrote:
>
>I've owned four new BMW's in the last 27 years. A 1986 325es, a 1994
>325i, a 2003 530i and currently a 2005 M3. I dearly love my M3... but
>you never forget your first. She spoiled me.


Oh, I still have my first, a 2002, but with 480,000 miles on the engine I
am unwilling to use it as a daily driver anymore.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #5  
Old October 24th 13, 05:50 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
Scott Dorsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,914
Default old 325i

R. Mark Clayton > wrote:
>
>The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
>tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.
>
>If it is a manual, well maintained and cheap then it could be enjoyable
>motoring for a while anyway. If auto, neglected or costly then walk away.


It's a manual and it looks nearly brand new. 100,000 miles or so, not a
spot of rust underneath.

>Realistically you would probably be better off buying a seven / several year
>old 5 series depending on your budget.


The problem is that I can't repair those things. The 1980s ones I can do
pretty much all the maintenance on myself, the later ones start to become
problematic. It's not the up-front cost, it's the long term costs.

>Not sure where the 535i comes into this - I drove a new M535i in 1987 - it
>was a bit of a beast!


It's a fun car, I bought mine 14 years ago knowing that it had some structural
rust problems, and I tried to keep them from spreading but eventually I lost
the battle.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #6  
Old October 24th 13, 06:27 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
R. Mark Clayton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 778
Default old 325i


"Scott Dorsey" > wrote in message
...
> R. Mark Clayton > wrote:
>>
>>The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
>>tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.
>>
>>If it is a manual, well maintained and cheap then it could be enjoyable
>>motoring for a while anyway. If auto, neglected or costly then walk away.

>
> It's a manual and it looks nearly brand new. 100,000 miles or so, not a
> spot of rust underneath.
>
>>Realistically you would probably be better off buying a seven / several
>>year
>>old 5 series depending on your budget.

>
> The problem is that I can't repair those things. The 1980s ones I can do
> pretty much all the maintenance on myself, the later ones start to become
> problematic. It's not the up-front cost, it's the long term costs.
>
>>Not sure where the 535i comes into this - I drove a new M535i in 1987 - it
>>was a bit of a beast!

>
> It's a fun car, I bought mine 14 years ago knowing that it had some
> structural
> rust problems, and I tried to keep them from spreading but eventually I
> lost
> the battle.


My mistake - E28.

> --scott
>
>
> --
> "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."



  #7  
Old October 24th 13, 08:47 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
Gordon Shumway
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default old 325i

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:15:26 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
> wrote:

>
>The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
>tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.


My 1986 325es could be a little tail happy if pushed hard but that was
part of the enjoyment. Most cars today have under steer designed in
to some degree. BTW, ABS was standard on my 1986 325es.
  #8  
Old October 25th 13, 10:19 AM posted to alt.autos.bmw
Scott M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default old 325i

Gordon Shumway wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:15:26 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
> > wrote:
>
>> The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
>> tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.

>
> My 1986 325es could be a little tail happy if pushed hard but that was
> part of the enjoyment. Most cars today have under steer designed in
> to some degree. BTW, ABS was standard on my 1986 325es.


I once heard[1] that the E21 was the unnervingly tail happy 3er and that
Received Wisdom tarred the E30 with the same brush while being, as said,
sedate unless you really pushed it. Certainly I can't recall direct
reports of people spinning E36 Compacts or Z3s (which lifted E30
components) just the "ooh, they've got the E30 suspension they'll be
tail happy" rhetoric.


[1] Therefore, possibly worthless post alert!

--
Scott

Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
  #9  
Old October 25th 13, 03:15 PM posted to alt.autos.bmw
R. Mark Clayton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 778
Default old 325i


"Scott M" > wrote in message
...
> Gordon Shumway wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:15:26 +0100, "R. Mark Clayton"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> The 325i is a rather sweet drive, but IIRC ones of this vintage could be
>>> tail happy in the wet and IIRC no standard ABS.

>>
>> My 1986 325es could be a little tail happy if pushed hard but that was
>> part of the enjoyment. Most cars today have under steer designed in
>> to some degree. BTW, ABS was standard on my 1986 325es.

>
> I once heard[1] that the E21 was the unnervingly tail happy 3er and that
> Received Wisdom tarred the E30 with the same brush while being, as said,
> sedate unless you really pushed it. Certainly I can't recall direct
> reports of people spinning E36 Compacts or Z3s (which lifted E30
> components) just the "ooh, they've got the E30 suspension they'll be tail
> happy" rhetoric.


The 2002 was tail happy - I once (~1977) saw one rotate 180 degrees on the
M62 and run backwards into the Armco (albeit it was towing a trailer).
The E21 was was tail happy too.
The E30 could be tail happy in the wet (see above).
By the E36 BMW have more or less got this sorted, but without ASC it would
still be easy for an inexperienced driver to swing the tail of a larger
engined one out by using too much throttle on a wet bend.

I have now looked it up. ABS was standard on the SE and sport versions, but
optional on the standard version.


>
>
> [1] Therefore, possibly worthless post alert!
>
> --
> Scott
>
> Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E36 325I Steven Otto BMW 2 December 20th 06 07:55 PM
New old car: '87 BMW 325i cab BBO BMW 2 August 30th 06 12:27 PM
Want 2 Buy A 93 BMW 325i? Sophia Williams BMW 1 February 27th 06 02:07 PM
e30 325I bmwdominican BMW 6 January 11th 06 09:25 PM
93 325i Erik BMW 7 January 2nd 05 05:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.