If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
I recently perused the drivers manuals for several states regarding intersections controlled by two or more stopsigns.
And except for a few small differences, they all agree on one point: "Yield to the vehicle stopped to your right." So if, say, at a 4-way stop, first come is NOT first go, how is the above, in quotes, enforced? Recently I arrived at a 4-way a split-sec ahead of another driver(to my right). And even though I repeatedly flicked my highbeams, honked, and even rolled down my window to wave him through, he just sat there, shaking his head, until I proceeded. By then we both had a small queue of vehicles stacking up on our rear bumpers. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
> wrote in message
... I recently perused the drivers manuals for several states regarding intersections controlled by two or more stopsigns. And except for a few small differences, they all agree on one point: "Yield to the vehicle stopped to your right." So if, say, at a 4-way stop, first come is NOT first go, how is the above, in quotes, enforced? Recently I arrived at a 4-way a split-sec ahead of another driver(to my right). And even though I repeatedly flicked my highbeams, honked, and even rolled down my window to wave him through, he just sat there, shaking his head, until I proceeded. By then we both had a small queue of vehicles stacking up on our rear bumpers. *** If (both cars stop at the same time) { yield to car stopped on the right } else { first car that is stopped is the first car that goes) } |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
On Nov 16, 7:21*pm, "Daniel W. Rouse Jr."
> wrote: > > wrote in message > > ... > I recently perused the drivers manuals for several states regarding > intersections controlled by two or more stopsigns. > > And except for a few small differences, they all agree on one point: > > "Yield to the vehicle stopped to your right." > > So if, say, at a 4-way stop, first come is NOT first go, how is the above, > in quotes, enforced? > > Recently I arrived at a 4-way a split-sec ahead of another driver(to my > right). *And even though I repeatedly flicked my highbeams, honked, and even > rolled down my window to wave him through, he just sat there, shaking his > head, until I proceeded. *By then we both had a small queue of vehicles > stacking up on our rear bumpers. > > *** If (both cars stop at the same time) { yield to car stopped on the > right } else { first car that is stopped is the first car that goes) } Yep. Also when a stoplight is not working, treat the intersection as a 4-way stop. I recently arrived as number 3 at a light that had jsut changed to red. And we waited, and waited and waited. The light had obviously malfunctioned but there was only one car that finally went when the traffice was backed p almost 2 blocks. Light finallyi changed to green a bit later. Harry K |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:21:30 PM UTC-5, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote:
> > *** If (both cars stop at the same time) { yield to car stopped on the > > right } else { first car that is stopped is the first car that goes) } ___________ OK, you're going to have to shoot that at me again - this time at grade-school level. If I read it right, are you saying that "yield to car stopped on the right" applies only in cases where both vehicles arrived at Stop sign at the same time? Otherwise if I got there first, I'm supposed to go before he/she does? Help! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
On Nov 17, 6:01*am, wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:21:30 PM UTC-5, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote: > > > *** If (both cars stop at the same time) { yield to car stopped on the > > > right } else { first car that is stopped is the first car that goes) } > > ___________ > OK, you're going to have to shoot that at me again - this time at grade-school level. > > If I read it right, are *you saying that "yield to car stopped on the right" applies only in cases where both vehicles arrived at Stop sign at the same time? > > Otherwise if I got there first, I'm supposed to go before he/she does? > > Help! That is correct. Harry K |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
On Nov 17, 6:01*am, wrote:
> On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:21:30 PM UTC-5, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote: > > > *** If (both cars stop at the same time) { yield to car stopped on the > > > right } else { first car that is stopped is the first car that goes) } > > ___________ > OK, you're going to have to shoot that at me again - this time at grade-school level. > > If I read it right, are *you saying that "yield to car stopped on the right" applies only in cases where both vehicles arrived at Stop sign at the same time? > > Otherwise if I got there first, I'm supposed to go before he/she does? > > Help! It is correct. "first come, first served" "If two arrive at same time, yield to one on the right" Harry K |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
Thanks Harry.
I was born with comprehension problems that you probably couldn't begin to comprehend(!) So I do appreciate efforts on here to clarify things for me. So no longer will I be waving on every driver who reaches a stop sign to my right(either before or after me). You've just made that part of driving infinitely easier for me. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
> wrote in message
... > Are we too simple-minded to handle them? Well, you are, of course. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
None:
If you can't give decent answers as have Rouse Jr. and Harry K than butt out. And run for political office - your bashing others skills will be quite useful in a campaign! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Multi-way stops: Are we too simple-minded to handle them legally?
> wrote in message
... > None: > > If you can't give decent answers as have Rouse Jr. and Harry K than > butt out. Nope. **** you ****stain.You seem to think you have some authority. Wrong as usual, spermbreath. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|