Anything wrong with Lincoln LS?

Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
be considering one.

On Wed, 18 May 2005 15:17:00 -0400, "Awwwkrap" >
wrote:

>Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
>be considering one.


I doubt the four wheel drive is up to serious off-roading, but you
could be the first to try it... Let us know.

Awwwkrap proclaimed:

> Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
> be considering one.
>
Well, off the top of my head, I don't think you can get one with
4-wheel drive. It does have a cousin with the same chassis that
can be had thusly, but the Jag isn't really considered an off road
vehicle--unless you count going into a high speed turn overcooked and
underskilled.

Pretty much the point...since this is a 4x4 newsgroup


"Lon" > wrote in message
...
> Awwwkrap proclaimed:
>
>> Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I
>> may
>> be considering one.
> Well, off the top of my head, I don't think you can get one with
> 4-wheel drive. It does have a cousin with the same chassis that
> can be had thusly, but the Jag isn't really considered an off road
> vehicle--unless you count going into a high speed turn overcooked and
> underskilled.