SPEEDING FINES BANNED BY GERMAN JUDGE

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:

><* US *> wrote in message ...
>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>> ><* US *> wrote in message ...
>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>> >>><* US *> wrote in message ...
>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>> >>>
>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't have much
>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at 1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>> >>>The video is:
>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>> >>>
>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds just hit refresh.
>> >>>
>> >>>Rocky
>> >>
>> >> Thank you.
>> >
>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate O'Reilly
>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts about
>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug journalism
>> >shortly after that.
>> >
>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set if I
>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>> >
>> >Rocky
>>
>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>
>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.

History will not view his ilk at all kindly.

"* US *" wrote in message ...
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>
>><* US *> wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>><* US *> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't have
>>>>much
>>>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at 1:00:00
>>>>and1:30:00.
>>>>
>>>>The video is:
>>>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>>>
>>>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds just
>>>>hit refresh.
>>>>
>>>>Rocky
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>
>>Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate O'Reilly
>>with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts
>>about
>>1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>journalism
>>shortly after that.
>>
>>I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set if I
>>see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>
>>Rocky
>
>
> O'Reilly is pitiable.


Rocktard, these conversations with yourself are getting pitiable.

--
--

Popeye
Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings.
They did it by killing all those who opposed them.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

<* US *> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>
>><* US *> wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>> ><* US *> wrote in message
>>> .. .
>>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>> >>><* US *> wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't
>>> >>>have much
>>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at
>>> >>>1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>>> >>>The video is:
>>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>> >>>
>>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds just
>>> >>>hit refresh.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Rocky
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you.
>>> >
>>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate
>>> >O'Reilly
>>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts
>>> >about
>>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>> >journalism
>>> >shortly after that.
>>> >
>>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set
>>> >if I
>>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>> >
>>> >Rocky
>>>
>>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>>
>>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.
>
> History will not view his ilk at all kindly.

BTW one of the dysfunctional truck drivers on misc.transport.trucking just
proved he is still dysfunctional with his recent post on this thread. I
don't have to quote him because I'm sure you know I'm posting about the
idiot I call dougface.

Rocky

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:31:09 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:

><* US *> wrote in message ...
>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>><* US *> wrote in message ...
>>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>> ><* US *> wrote in message ...
>>>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>> >>><* US *> wrote in message ...
>>>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't
>>>> >>>have much
>>>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at
>>>> >>>1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>>>> >>>The video is:
>>>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds just
>>>> >>>hit refresh.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Rocky
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thank you.
>>>> >
>>>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate
>>>> >O'Reilly
>>>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts
>>>> >about
>>>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>>> >journalism
>>>> >shortly after that.
>>>> >
>>>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set
>>>> >if I
>>>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>>> >
>>>> >Rocky
>>>>
>>>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>>>
>>>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.
>>
>> History will not view his ilk at all kindly.
>
>BTW one of the dysfunctional truck drivers on misc.transport.trucking just
>proved he is still dysfunctional with his recent post on this thread. I
>don't have to quote him because I'm sure you know I'm posting about the
>idiot I call dougface.
>
>Rocky

Pity him too. Somebody has to be last to get a clue, if ever.

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:52:23 -0500, "Dou\gl"as" W. \"Popeye\" Fre\derick"
> wrote:

>... pitiable.

It's not about you, though.

It's about how 9/11 was an inside job.

<* US *> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:31:09 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>
>><* US *> wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>><* US *> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>>> ><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't
>>>>> >>>have much
>>>>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at
>>>>> >>>1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>>>>> >>>The video is:
>>>>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>>>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds
>>>>> >>>just
>>>>> >>>hit refresh.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>Rocky
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thank you.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate
>>>>> >O'Reilly
>>>>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts
>>>>> >about
>>>>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>>>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>>>> >journalism
>>>>> >shortly after that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set
>>>>> >if I
>>>>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>>>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.
>>>
>>> History will not view his ilk at all kindly.
>>
>>BTW one of the dysfunctional truck drivers on misc.transport.trucking just
>>proved he is still dysfunctional with his recent post on this thread. I
>>don't have to quote him because I'm sure you know I'm posting about the
>>idiot I call dougface.
>>
>>Rocky
>
> Pity him too. Somebody has to be last to get a clue, if ever.

That is true and dougface has overlooked so many clues in his life it makes
him laughable. I could go on and on about dougface but it would be just be
more of what he did on this thread today.

Rocky

I guess hearing the truth messes up your imaginary view of what really
happened, huh ?
hehehehehe

--
JerryD(upstateNY)

>Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate O'Reilly
>with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts about
>1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug journalism
>shortly after that.
>
>I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set if I
>see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>
>Rocky


O'Reilly is pitiable.

"Rocky" > wrote in message
...
>
> <* US *> wrote in message
> ...
>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:31:09 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>
>>><* US *> wrote in message
...
>>>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>>><* US *> wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>>>> ><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>>> .. .
>>>>>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't
>>>>>> >>>have much
>>>>>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at
>>>>>> >>>1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>>>>>> >>>The video is:
>>>>>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>>>>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds
>>>>>> >>>just
>>>>>> >>>hit refresh.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>Rocky
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thank you.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate
>>>>>> >O'Reilly
>>>>>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that
>>>>>> >starts
>>>>>> >about
>>>>>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>>>>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>>>>> >journalism
>>>>>> >shortly after that.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV
>>>>>> >set
>>>>>> >if I
>>>>>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>>>>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Rocky
>>>>>>
>>>>>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.
>>>>
>>>> History will not view his ilk at all kindly.
>>>
>>>BTW one of the dysfunctional truck drivers on misc.transport.trucking
>>>just
>>>proved he is still dysfunctional with his recent post on this thread. I
>>>don't have to quote him because I'm sure you know I'm posting about the
>>>idiot I call dougface.
>>>
>>>Rocky
>>
>> Pity him too. Somebody has to be last to get a clue, if ever.
>
> That is true and dougface has overlooked so many clues in his life it
> makes him laughable. I could go on and on about dougface but it would be
> just be more of what he did on this thread today.
>
> Rocky

Does it echo when you do that?

--
--

Popeye
Rome did not create a great empire by having meetings.
They did it by killing all those who opposed them.

www.finalprotectivefire.com
http://picasaweb.google.com/Popeye8762

On 21 Nov 2010 07:30:40 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

>Dave Head > wrote:
>>On 17 Nov 2010 06:39:39 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>
>>>OJ Simpson > wrote:
>>>>.... meaning that America will have a chance to prosper over the next
>>>>2 years.
>>>
>>>Because the last time they had control of the government we ended up
>>>with two wars, $7 trillion of debt, and the worst recession in 70
>>>years.
>>
>>1) We were ATTACKED! What part of defense don't people understand?
>
>Who attacked, rightard? Think about it for a moment.

Fanatical Muslim terrorists.

>>2) Yeah, GWB should have found a way to pay for the wars. However,
>>the remainder of the world _did_ let us down with respect to
>>assistance that they were obligated to provide via various treaties
>
>Wrong again, rightard. There is no such treaty.

There is NATO. We shoudl have received a LOT more help from these
people, after defending their vulerable butts from the Russkies for
decades and for billions of dollars.

>>3) The economic meltdown was a result of a Democratic-inspired time
>>bomb known as the Community Reinvestment Act, which had the gov't
>
>That's a bald-faced lie, asshole. The recession is the result of Wall
>Street corruption and a refusal by Bush to provide any oversight.

Bush tried to provide oversight by reigning in Freddie and Fannie in
2004, but the congress-critters wouldn't allow it to happen. Not much
you can do when you can't get cooperation.

The recession was the result of millions of bad mortgage loans to
people that everyone knew couldn't pay them off, thanks to bonehead
laws that practically mandated the loans.

<* US *> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:31:09 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>
>><* US *> wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:37:24 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>><* US *> wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:34:13 -0600, "Rocky" > wrote:
>>>>> ><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>> .. .
>>>>> >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:36:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>><* US *> wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>> >>>> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:09:56 -0600, "Rocky" >
>>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> You're exactly right, of course.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>Thanks and I just watched a video you might like but if you don't
>>>>> >>>have much
>>>>> >>>time for it then just stick to small portions of it starting at
>>>>> >>>1:00:00 and1:30:00.
>>>>> >>>The video is:
>>>>> >>>9/11 Ripple Effect - FULL (High Resolution)
>>>>> >>> http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10749489496889
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>and if for some reason the video does not start in a few seconds
>>>>> >>>just
>>>>> >>>hit refresh.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>Rocky
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thank you.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Maybe that wasn't such a good video after all because now I hate
>>>>> >O'Reilly
>>>>> >with a passion. I'll never forget the part in that video that starts
>>>>> >about
>>>>> >1:11:50 with: "There are those however that use what some call thug
>>>>> >journalism." and then it shows an example of O'Reilly using thug
>>>>> >journalism
>>>>> >shortly after that.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >I tell you, I am so mad at O'Reilly right now I might punch my TV set
>>>>> >if I
>>>>> >see him on it. I hope that changes tomorrow.
>>>>> > http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillyfoxfaq.htm
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Rocky
>>>>>
>>>>> O'Reilly is pitiable.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks I needed that because now O'Riler doesn't rile me up so bad.
>>>
>>> History will not view his ilk at all kindly.
>>
>>BTW one of the dysfunctional truck drivers on misc.transport.trucking just
>>proved he is still dysfunctional with his recent post on this thread. I
>>don't have to quote him because I'm sure you know I'm posting about the
>>idiot I call dougface.
>>
>>Rocky
>
> Pity him too. Somebody has to be last to get a clue, if ever.

Back to Flight 93. Boy is the following website ever planting evidence.
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/05/2....93/index.html

The fact that Flight 93 was delayed on the tarmac 41 minutes screwed up a
lot of the plans made by government thugs and I'd bet money that if Flight
93 had not been delayed we would have seen a jet fly into WT7 on September
11, 2001.

World Trade Center Building 7 was clearly rigged to implode as proven by
it's ultimate destruction so government thugs must have been waiting for a
jet to hit it.

Rocky