When It's Not Retro Enough

Build your own.

Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.

What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?

http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996

Patrick

On 2011-10-27, > wrote:
> Build your own.
>
> Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>
> What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>
> http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996

It just doesn't look right. I think it would have been better to buy a
dynacorn body and rework it to fit the modern drivetrain.

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:53:53 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>Build your own.
>
>Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>
>What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>
>http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996
>
>Patrick


I like the real 2012 look better but what he's done is OK.

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 02:32:45 +0000 (UTC), Brent
> wrote:

>On 2011-10-27, > wrote:
>> Build your own.
>>
>> Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>>
>> What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>>
>> http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996
>
>It just doesn't look right. I think it would have been better to buy a
>dynacorn body and rework it to fit the modern drivetrain.
>

Good point. Ford is going to begin selling new 65/66 Dynacorn bodies
for $15K. From there you can build it anyway you want. Seems to me
that that would be easier than conversion. Cost would depend on your
sources.

On 10/30/2011 21:32, Brent wrote:
> On 2011-10-27, > wrote:
>> Build your own.
>>
>> Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>>
>> What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>>
>> http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996
>
> It just doesn't look right. I think it would have been better to buy a
> dynacorn body and rework it to fit the modern drivetrain.
>
>



A brand new 1965 Mustang for $15k
http://anonym.to/?http://www.foxnews...ng/?test=faces

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:56:11 -0500, "WindsorFox<SS>"
> wrote:

>On 10/30/2011 21:32, Brent wrote:
>> On 2011-10-27, > wrote:
>>> Build your own.
>>>
>>> Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>>>
>>> What do you think? Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>>>
>>> http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-gt/#more-7996
>>
>> It just doesn't look right. I think it would have been better to buy a
>> dynacorn body and rework it to fit the modern drivetrain.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> A brand new 1965 Mustang for $15k
>http://anonym.to/?http://www.foxnews...ng/?test=faces

Not quite. It's a brand new Dynacorm 65/66 Mustang body for $15,000.
The buyer adds everything else. Essentially, it's a kit car.

On Nov 2, 11:47*am, D E Willson > wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:56:11 -0500, "WindsorFox<SS>"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On 10/30/2011 21:32, Brent wrote:
> >> On 2011-10-27, > *wrote:
> >>> Build your own.
>
> >>> Interesting project, but an awful lot of work.
>
> >>> What do you think? *Thumbs up or thumbs down?
>
> >>>http://www.mustangheaven.com/2011/se...-creates-retro....
>
> >> It just doesn't look right. I think it would have been better to buy a
> >> dynacorn body and rework it to fit the modern drivetrain.
>
> > * *A brand new 1965 Mustang for $15k
> >http://anonym.to/?http://www.foxnews...0/28/ford-unve...
>
> Not quite. It's a brand new Dynacorm 65/66 Mustang body for $15,000.
> The buyer adds everything else. Essentially, it's a kit car.

More pics.

http://www.stangtv.com/features/sema...on-2011-stang/

Patrick