At home wheel balancing

On Jul 31, 6:41*pm, "Heron" > wrote:

Damn! Why are you making "rocket science" out of balancing a tire?!?!

"Heron" > wrote in message
...
> "hls" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Heron" > wrote in message
>
> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM


Dont get your panties in a wad..

"hls" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Heron" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "hls" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Heron" > wrote in message
>>
>> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
>> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM
>
> Dont get your panties in a wad..

Aren't you in fact the one that has already egocentrically in
the past announced (as if anyone could possibly care less)
your planned departure from this newsgroup (as well as
others, no less, the below being just one easily located
example) due to your "bunched panties" craven inability to
withstand the constant correction by others of your consistent errors?
https://groups.google.com/group/alt....e078bc1ecd8ce0

How truly ironic that you'd respond, despite the lack of
an iota of support or evidence for that inference, with such
an embarrassingly revealing and an obvious projection.

"Heron" > wrote in message
...
> "hls" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Heron" > wrote in message


I came back to have a look.
You are proof that nothing has gotten any better, dip****.

"hls" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Heron" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "hls" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Heron" > wrote in message
>>
>> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
>> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM
>
> Dont get your panties in a wad..

Aren't you in fact the one that has already egocentrically in
the past announced (as if anyone could possibly care less)
your planned departure from this newsgroup (as well as
others, no less, the below being just one easily located
example) due to your "bunched panties" craven inability to
withstand the constant correction by others of your consistent errors?
https://groups.google.com/group/alt....e078bc1ecd8ce0

How truly ironic that you'd respond, despite the lack of
an iota of support or evidence for that inference, with such
an embarrassingly revealing and an obvious projection.

"hls" > wrote in message
...
>
> I came back to have a look.
> You are proof that nothing has gotten any better, dip****.

Then, as always and oh so clearly and incontrovertibly
demonstrated, the true dip**** would quite obviously
still have to be you then wouldn't it. Whoosh! (yet again)

"Heron" > wrote in message
...
> "hls" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Heron" > wrote in message

Your attempts at logic are as poor as your attempts at writing technical
subjects.

But, that is enough for now.

"Heron" > wrote in message
...
> "hls" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Heron" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "hls" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> "Heron" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
>>> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM
>>
>> Dont get your panties in a wad..
>
> Aren't you in fact the one that has already egocentrically in
> the past announced (as if anyone could possibly care less)
> your planned departure from this newsgroup (as well as
> others, no less, the below being just one easily located
> example) due to your "bunched panties" craven inability to
> withstand the constant correction by others of your consistent errors?
> https://groups.google.com/group/alt....e078bc1ecd8ce0
>
> How truly ironic that you'd respond, despite the lack of
> an iota of support or evidence for that inference, with such
> an embarrassingly revealing and an obvious projection.
>
> "hls" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> I came back to have a look.
>> You are proof that nothing has gotten any better, dip****.
>
> Then, as always and oh so clearly and incontrovertibly
> demonstrated, the true dip**** would quite obviously
> still have to be you then wouldn't it. Whoosh! (yet again)

"hls" > wrote in message
...
>
> Your attempts at logic are as poor as your attempts at writing technical
> subjects.
>
> But, that is enough for now.

So more accurately stated, it would seem that you were formerly
and possibly correct about at least one thing though (no doubt a
first for you), nothing has changed, and apparently it will continue
to remain to be just one fatuous post after another with you.

On 08/02/2012 04:10 AM, Heron wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>
>>> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
>>> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM
>>
>> Dont get your panties in a wad..
>
> Aren't you in fact the one that has already egocentrically in
> the past announced (as if anyone could possibly care less)
> your planned departure from this newsgroup (as well as
> others, no less, the below being just one easily located
> example) due to your "bunched panties" craven inability to
> withstand the constant correction by others of your consistent errors?
> https://groups.google.com/group/alt....e078bc1ecd8ce0
>
> How truly ironic that you'd respond, despite the lack of
> an iota of support or evidence for that inference, with such
> an embarrassingly revealing and an obvious projection.
>
> > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> I came back to have a look.
>> You are proof that nothing has gotten any better, dip****.
>
> Then, as always and oh so clearly and incontrovertibly
> demonstrated, the true dip**** would quite obviously
> still have to be you then wouldn't it. Whoosh! (yet again)

did you find "dip****" in the thesaurus? or the mirror?


--
fact check required

"jim beam" > wrote in message
...
> On 08/02/2012 04:10 AM, Heron wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> Should it not have been clear, I wasn't referring to a bubble
>>>> balance but, instead, my earlier post in this thread, namely:
>>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fro...ch/WWfIgRHXbZM
>>>
>>> Dont get your panties in a wad..
>>
>> Aren't you in fact the one that has already egocentrically in
>> the past announced (as if anyone could possibly care less)
>> your planned departure from this newsgroup (as well as
>> others, no less, the below being just one easily located
>> example) due to your "bunched panties" craven inability to
>> withstand the constant correction by others of your consistent errors?
>> https://groups.google.com/group/alt....e078bc1ecd8ce0
>>
>> How truly ironic that you'd respond, despite the lack of
>> an iota of support or evidence for that inference, with such
>> an embarrassingly revealing and an obvious projection.
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> I came back to have a look.
>>> You are proof that nothing has gotten any better, dip****.
>>
>> Then, as always and oh so clearly and incontrovertibly
>> demonstrated, the true dip**** would quite obviously
>> still have to be you then wouldn't it. Whoosh! (yet again)
>
> did you find "dip****" in the thesaurus?


the word prolly came to em after reading your posts