If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
(milk and eggs)
seasoned bread crumbs 1 onion minced salt pepper butter olive oil Pound the breasts flat (parboil first if using umbilical cords so they won?t be tough). Place a slice of ham and cheese on each, along with some minced onion then fold in half, trimming neatly. Dredge in flour, eggwash, then seasoned breadcrumbs; allow to sit for a few minutes. Sauté in butter and olive oil until golden brown, about 6 minutes on each side. Shish Kababes As old as the hills, this technique has employed seafood, beef, pork, lamb, poultry, and vegetables; just about anything can be grilled, and young humans are no exception! High quality marinade (Teriyaki and garlic perhaps) 1 inch cubes of tender meat, preferably from the nursery Onions bell peppers Wooden or metal skewers Marinate the meat overnight. Get the grill good and hot while placing meat, vegetables, and fruit such as pineapples or cherries on the skewers. Don?t be afraid to use a variety of meats. Grill to medium rare, serve with garlic cous-co |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"> > I find headlights much worse than spinners. How can one judge the > intentions of oncoming drivers without seeing their faces? How can one > see their faces if they are hidden behind headlights? > > A headlight should be mounted on a pole extending in front of a vehicle. > It should be aimed back toward the vehicle. That way, the driver can > see the pavement ahead and oncoming drivers can see the driver's face. > Criminals won't like this, but laws should be written for the > law-abiding majority. > -- Marcia - Next time, stop at three cups of egg-nog. That's your limit. Do NOT exceed it again. -Dave |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"> > I find headlights much worse than spinners. How can one judge the > intentions of oncoming drivers without seeing their faces? How can one > see their faces if they are hidden behind headlights? > > A headlight should be mounted on a pole extending in front of a vehicle. > It should be aimed back toward the vehicle. That way, the driver can > see the pavement ahead and oncoming drivers can see the driver's face. > Criminals won't like this, but laws should be written for the > law-abiding majority. > -- Marcia - Next time, stop at three cups of egg-nog. That's your limit. Do NOT exceed it again. -Dave |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Lloyd Randall" > wrote in message ... >A couple of days ago I saw an SUV turn around at the park. I took it to > be an Explorer or Blazer because it looked big and angular. However, > the rear side window was rounded and tapered toward the rear, like that > of a Focus. The roof curved downward toward the rear. > > I don't know of a large SUV that's angular in front but curvy in back. > What could it have been? The Nissan "armada" is the ugliest SUV I have ever seen, it looks like two different designs were smashed together in the design stage. The back four feet don't have anything to do with the rest of the vehicle. http://www.automotive.com/2004/12/ni...tos/index.html the first picture shows it best, but really you need to see it in person to get the gut wrenching effect. Bernard |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Lloyd Randall" > wrote in message ... >A couple of days ago I saw an SUV turn around at the park. I took it to > be an Explorer or Blazer because it looked big and angular. However, > the rear side window was rounded and tapered toward the rear, like that > of a Focus. The roof curved downward toward the rear. > > I don't know of a large SUV that's angular in front but curvy in back. > What could it have been? The Nissan "armada" is the ugliest SUV I have ever seen, it looks like two different designs were smashed together in the design stage. The back four feet don't have anything to do with the rest of the vehicle. http://www.automotive.com/2004/12/ni...tos/index.html the first picture shows it best, but really you need to see it in person to get the gut wrenching effect. Bernard |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Bernard Farquart wrote:
> "Lloyd Randall" > wrote in message > ... > >>A couple of days ago I saw an SUV turn around at the park. I took it to >>be an Explorer or Blazer because it looked big and angular. However, >>the rear side window was rounded and tapered toward the rear, like that >>of a Focus. The roof curved downward toward the rear. >> >>I don't know of a large SUV that's angular in front but curvy in back. >>What could it have been? > > > The Nissan "armada" is the ugliest SUV > I have ever seen, it looks like two different > designs were smashed together in the design > stage. The back four feet don't have anything > to do with the rest of the vehicle. > > http://www.automotive.com/2004/12/ni...tos/index.html > > the first picture shows it best, but really > you need to see it in person to get the gut > wrenching effect. > > Bernard > As opposed to any other SUV? Maybe I'm just prejudiced against the whole vehicle type, but honestly, the best I can say is some of them aren't offensive. A lot are crimes of fashion, however - like the Escalade? It was bad enough when Pontiac put all that plastic **** all over their vehicles, does Cadillac really need to do it too? The Ford "I left my truck out in the sun too long" look? ugh... Even the Porsche Cayenne makes me want to burn my 944 in protest, even if it does have Hand-of-God acceleration. Hmm, I wonder how hard it would be to swap that turbo Cayenne engine into an old 928... (cracks knuckles) nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Bernard Farquart wrote:
> "Lloyd Randall" > wrote in message > ... > >>A couple of days ago I saw an SUV turn around at the park. I took it to >>be an Explorer or Blazer because it looked big and angular. However, >>the rear side window was rounded and tapered toward the rear, like that >>of a Focus. The roof curved downward toward the rear. >> >>I don't know of a large SUV that's angular in front but curvy in back. >>What could it have been? > > > The Nissan "armada" is the ugliest SUV > I have ever seen, it looks like two different > designs were smashed together in the design > stage. The back four feet don't have anything > to do with the rest of the vehicle. > > http://www.automotive.com/2004/12/ni...tos/index.html > > the first picture shows it best, but really > you need to see it in person to get the gut > wrenching effect. > > Bernard > As opposed to any other SUV? Maybe I'm just prejudiced against the whole vehicle type, but honestly, the best I can say is some of them aren't offensive. A lot are crimes of fashion, however - like the Escalade? It was bad enough when Pontiac put all that plastic **** all over their vehicles, does Cadillac really need to do it too? The Ford "I left my truck out in the sun too long" look? ugh... Even the Porsche Cayenne makes me want to burn my 944 in protest, even if it does have Hand-of-God acceleration. Hmm, I wonder how hard it would be to swap that turbo Cayenne engine into an old 928... (cracks knuckles) nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery Small Oriental 4WD? | [email protected] | 4x4 | 9 | January 15th 05 09:23 PM |
A bit of a brake mystery | [email protected] | BMW | 2 | December 19th 04 11:35 PM |
mystery fenders | Glenn Pavlovic | Antique cars | 1 | October 29th 04 07:44 AM |
Mystery spark plugs in 2002 stratus | Alan Wedin | Dodge | 8 | June 19th 04 02:29 PM |