If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
"Mal Osborne" > wrote:
> Some idiot talking on a mobile driving into the back of a your car > when if broke down would be in the wrong. True, but if you're driving a Miata and he's driving an 18 wheeler does him being wrong make up for you being dead? Here, and I suspect where you are also, people tend to follow much too closely so if you're driving at speed and the timming belt breaks you do have a very real possibility of being hit from behind. Since we're driving Miatas, it's an almost sure thing the other guy will be bigger and heavier and, right or wrong, we'll sustain the greater injuries. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
XS11E > wrote:
> too closely so if you're driving at speed and the timming belt I probably meant timing belt, who knows? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
"Mal Osborne" > wrote:
> >> >> Of course, not replacing at 60 kmi has the disadvantage that you cannot >> blame Mazda for the chain collision you caused having your belt go out >> at 70 kmi in the middle of a busy freeway in front of that SUV that >> was not on the cell phone at the time. The legal responsibility >> will be all yours. >> >> Leon > >Dunno how things work over there in "The land of the free", but over here if >you run into the back of another vehicle, you are almost certainly in the >wrong. Technically yes. But what a jury aware of real life on the highways will think is another matter. > (possible exceptions are if the driver in front is drunk, driving >unlicensed, reversing, or deliboratly attempting to cause an accident). I am sure a jury would look unfavorable on the fact that proper maintenance was *not* performed, leading to a car coming to a full stop in the middle of the freeway without any brake lights to show for it. >Some idiot talking on a mobile driving into the back of a your car when if >broke down would be in the wrong. Which is why I noted he was *not* on the cell phone, according to the available evidence. Leon >Loosing power while accellerating into a small gap in traffic, or crossing >lanes could see you in the wrong. Also breaking down in the middle of >nowhere, or the middle of somewhere bad would not be fun. -- Leon van Dommelen Bess, the Miata Bozo, the Miata http://www.dommelen.net/miata The only thing better than a white Miata is two white Miatas |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
zenmartini wrote:
> I know the timing belt is supposed to be replaced at 60k. My 2000 is > at 75k but the belt is in good condition... no nicks etc. Money is > tight at the moment... how much longer can I go before this has to be > replaced... I know that I'll be stuck wherever I am but there is no > damage that can occur right? > The biggest risk is that it fails halfway through an overtaking manoeuvre. However, and for reasons I don't understand, the Miata/MX-5 belts normally fail when the engine is first fired up. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
Zog The Undeniable > wrote:
>zenmartini wrote: >> I know the timing belt is supposed to be replaced at 60k. My 2000 is >> at 75k but the belt is in good condition... no nicks etc. Money is >> tight at the moment... how much longer can I go before this has to be >> replaced... I know that I'll be stuck wherever I am but there is no >> damage that can occur right? >> >The biggest risk is that it fails halfway through an overtaking >manoeuvre. However, and for reasons I don't understand, the Miata/MX-5 >belts normally fail when the engine is first fired up. The rubber is harder when the belt is cold? Leon -- Leon van Dommelen Bess, the Miata Bozo, the Miata http://www.dommelen.net/miata The only thing better than a white Miata is two white Miatas |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
, replace the water pump too; it's only about > a $75 part, but if it fails it'd cost an additional $150-$200 in labor to > take off the stuff you need to to get at it, not to mention you might ruin > the cylinder head if it overheats. > > Yours WDK - $75 might be Mazda pricing, not sure but when I replaced my waterpump on the NA a couple years ago it was like $30 @ Autozone (I know some people will groan abouthe Zone). I figure at the first timing belt change, the waterpump usually doesn't get changed but at the second it seem silly not to. Chris 99BBB |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
> The rubber is harder when the belt is cold? > I think it's very likely that's exactly the reason. Another part of it may be that initial start up puts more torque on it than gradual acceleration does. Chris 99BBB |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
"Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote in message ... > >> The rubber is harder when the belt is cold? >> > > I think it's very likely that's exactly the reason. Another part of it may > be that initial start up puts more torque on it than gradual acceleration > does. > > Chris > 99BBB The torsional forces on the belt are highest at lower speeds, engine turning at start speed-ca 200rpm. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
"Leon van Dommelen" > wrote in message ... > Zog The Undeniable > wrote: > >>zenmartini wrote: >>> I know the timing belt is supposed to be replaced at 60k. My 2000 is >>> at 75k but the belt is in good condition... no nicks etc. Money is >>> tight at the moment... how much longer can I go before this has to be >>> replaced... I know that I'll be stuck wherever I am but there is no >>> damage that can occur right? >>> >>The biggest risk is that it fails halfway through an overtaking >>manoeuvre. However, and for reasons I don't understand, the Miata/MX-5 >>belts normally fail when the engine is first fired up. > > The rubber is harder when the belt is cold? > > Leon > -- > Also oil is cold & more viscious. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Timing belt question
"miker" wrote:
> When I first started reading this group I remember this subject coming > up. It was said that the water pumps often start to fail near 100k and > all the same stuff has to come off, so do the belt and the water pump > between 80k and 100k. > > (No experience myself with this, just remembered it as sounding > sensible.) > > miker I changed my timing belt somewhere in the 75-80k mile range. Unfortunately I didn't know to do the water pump too. The water pump went about 30k miles later.. so I got a new water pump and a new timing belt. If you're doing one, always do the other. I have about 60k miles on the "new" water pump and timing belt, and plan to replace them when they have about 100k miles on them. -Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
78 VW Rabbit Diesel TIming Belt/Injector Timing Question | JH | VW water cooled | 13 | August 5th 06 02:57 AM |
Another timing belt question | Dave Smith | Mazda | 15 | April 14th 06 02:29 AM |
16V timing belt question | Rick | VW water cooled | 0 | October 23rd 05 02:14 AM |
timing belt question... | qslim | Honda | 1 | November 15th 04 04:20 AM |
98 Jetta: timing belt question-non-interference?/transmission fluid question | Ben867-5309 | VW water cooled | 1 | October 20th 04 03:53 PM |