Bush: Pay up - or take the bus

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:18:56 -0400, "Lou"
> wrote:
>Hydrogen as fuel, for mass market automobile type vehicles anyway, is never
>going to happen,

Why is it that people feel they can see into the future? Also, why
don't they ever realize how stupid predictions like this are, as they
are always wrong?

DTJ > wrote
> Lou > wrote

>> Hydrogen as fuel, for mass market automobile
>> type vehicles anyway, is never going to happen,

> Why is it that people feel they can see into the future?

They like to pontificate ?

> Also, why don't they ever realize how stupid
> predictions like this are, as they are always wrong?

Not always, you wont ever be able to fart
your way to the moon, mars in spades.

DTJ > wrote
> Rod Speed > wrote
>> DTJ > wrote
>>> Rod Speed > wrote

>>>>> Besides, I bet the incremental cost over the previously-subsidized
>>>>> fares is negligible -- remember, you won't need to sell tickets or
>>>>> pay people to make sure that each passenger has one.

>>>> Thats completely trivial to automate now so it doesnt cost much.

>>> Where do people come up with crap like this?
>>> Do you think that automation is free?

>> Never said it was free, JUST that its a small cost

> Next time you should at least attempt to hide
> what you said by snipping the stupidity.

This time you should have tried to bull**** your way
out of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.

>>>> Thats completely trivial to automate now so it doesnt cost much.

> Like I said - do you think automation is free?

Like I said, never ever said it was free, JUST that its
a small cost compared with the cost of the hardware
like the bus/train or wages for a monkey to collect fares.

> Of the hardware?

Que ?

> Maybe people will just donate their time.

No need when even someone as stupid as you should
be able to work out that when they do get paid the
going rate, automated fare collection is STILL a small
cost compared with the cost of the hardware like the
bus/train or wages for a monkey to collect fares.

> Otherwise even a ****wit like you should be able
> to calculate that it is far more costly to replace a
> system like what we have with an automated one.

Not a ****ing clue with the wages of fare collecting monkeys alone.

> Generally speaking the payback on software/hardware
> automation has to occur in 12 to 24 months or it is
> TOO ****ING EXPENSIVE YOU MORON.

Even a terminal ****wit such as yourself should be able
to bull**** its way out of its predicament better than that
pathetic effort, you gutless desperately cowering cretin.

Rod Speed wrote:
> DTJ > wrote
> > Lou > wrote
>
> >> Hydrogen as fuel, for mass market automobile
> >> type vehicles anyway, is never going to happen,
>
> > Why is it that people feel they can see into the future?
>
> They like to pontificate ?

Like your parents when they said you'r be a welfare bum.
Little did they know their prediction would come true.

In article >,
"Rod Speed" > wrote:

> DTJ > wrote
> > Lou > wrote
>
> >> Hydrogen as fuel, for mass market automobile
> >> type vehicles anyway, is never going to happen,
>
> > Why is it that people feel they can see into the future?
>
> They like to pontificate ?
>
> > Also, why don't they ever realize how stupid
> > predictions like this are, as they are always wrong?
>
> Not always, you wont ever be able to fart
> your way to the moon, mars in spades.

That may depend on how much output he can generate!

In article >,
DTJ > wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:18:56 -0400, "Lou"
> > wrote:
> >Hydrogen as fuel, for mass market automobile type vehicles anyway, is never
> >going to happen,
>
> Why is it that people feel they can see into the future? Also, why
> don't they ever realize how stupid predictions like this are, as they
> are always wrong?

Good questions. You would think people would have learned after seeing
the predictions of those who insisted that the horseless carriage and
the airplane would never work, or those who thought Intel would never be
able to make a Pentium faster than 500Mhtz!