If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
Looking at real oem there are common shock absorber part numbers for E46
coupe/saloon and for convertible/touring models. There are also differences between 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder. I understand the spring rates/sizes vary for standard/sport/and Msport but do they vary much between the different models? The shock absorbers do but I'm not sure about the spring rates other than they are colour coded for the options fitted to the car. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
David Haggas wrote:
> Looking at real oem there are common shock absorber part numbers for E46 > coupe/saloon and for convertible/touring models. There are also differences > between 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder. I understand the spring rates/sizes vary > for standard/sport/and Msport but do they vary much between the different > models? The shock absorbers do but I'm not sure about the spring rates other > than they are colour coded for the options fitted to the car. If you find the Sachs catalogue for springs it'll give you a gazillion different options for the E46. Boils down to weight (and stance, secondarily) so a 318i springs will differ from a 320d, which differs from a 330i, which differs from a 330d. And then there's the body it's in (coupe is lighter than a saloon, lighter than a touring.) And for each of these there's the choice of manual or autobox. And whether or not its got aircon. Then there's normal or sport ride heights. So that gives you 4 x 3 x 2 x 2 = 48 different springs on an imcomplete list of possibilities! Of course there will be some overlap; a manual 330d may share the same springs as an auto 330i as an autobox is heavier while the petrol engine is lighter. -- Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
"Scott M" > wrote in message ... > David Haggas wrote: >> Looking at real oem there are common shock absorber part numbers for E46 >> coupe/saloon and for convertible/touring models. There are also >> differences >> between 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder. I understand the spring rates/sizes >> vary >> for standard/sport/and Msport but do they vary much between the different >> models? The shock absorbers do but I'm not sure about the spring rates >> other >> than they are colour coded for the options fitted to the car. > > If you find the Sachs catalogue for springs it'll give you a gazillion > different options for the E46. Boils down to weight (and stance, > secondarily) so a 318i springs will differ from a 320d, which differs from > a 330i, which differs from a 330d. And then there's the body it's in > (coupe is lighter than a saloon, lighter than a touring.) And for each of > these there's the choice of manual or autobox. And whether or not its got > aircon. Then there's normal or sport ride heights. > > So that gives you 4 x 3 x 2 x 2 = 48 different springs on an imcomplete > list of possibilities! Of course there will be some overlap; a manual 330d > may share the same springs as an auto 330i as an autobox is heavier while > the petrol engine is lighter. > > -- > Scott -------------- Many thanks for all that information. Yes lots of different combinations but I wonder about the actual spring rate difference when we are talking about perhaps the difference between say a few bags of luggage and an extra person's weight over the axle. I suppose for real world differences there's no substitute for trying different set-ups. I have a 2002 330 convertible auto with M sports package 2 and my intention - after 5 years of being badly shaken on appallingly maintained British roads - is to soften the ride and make the car more pleasurable to drive over long distances. I drove a friend's 318 coupe manual with the same 18 inch staggered wheels and tyres (255/35 and 225/40) as my car and it rode beautifully so I can rule out the wheel tyre combination, although I recognise changing these to 17 would improve things further. Ideally I want the same suspension 'feel' as the 318 transposing onto mine, but my car weighs probably 300kg more so simply using 318 components might not work ideally. I have obtained some standard 6 cylinder struts (springs with three red marks) part number 1096855/6 and some rear springs from a 323 coupe (two blue marks) all for GBP60 from a breaker in the hope that I can emulate that 318 ride. David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
David Haggas wrote:
> Many thanks for all that information. Yes lots of different combinations but > I wonder about the actual spring rate difference when we are talking about > perhaps the difference between say a few bags of luggage and an extra > person's weight over the axle. It is an odd thing to specify so many different spring rates when, as you say, the usage of the car affects its weight far more than whether or not its got aircon, but that really is how they do it! > I suppose for real world differences there's > no substitute for trying different set-ups. I have a 2002 330 convertible > auto with M sports package 2 and my intention - after 5 years of being badly > shaken on appallingly maintained British roads - is to soften the ride and > make the car more pleasurable to drive over long distances. The E46 Sport suspension is noted as being too bloody hard. I've got a 320d SE and that bashes and crashes more than I'd like sometimes so I can't begin to imagine what the Sport is like. > I drove a friend's 318 coupe manual with the same 18 inch staggered wheels > and tyres (255/35 and 225/40) as my car and it rode beautifully so I can > rule out the wheel tyre combination, although I recognise changing these to > 17 would improve things further. Not really. The big step difference for the effect of tyre size on comfort comes with sidewall shape. 50+ profile tyres with their curved sidewalls are inherently 'softer' than the flat sided 45-and-below profiles. For an E46 this is the jump between 16" and 17" rims - and I think 16s don't fit on a 330i because of the brake disc size (certainly the case for the 330d.) I've gone the other way on mine (16" to 17" rims) and, with the natural stiffness of the SE, it actually didn't make that much odds. With a Sport you'd have to go down to balloon sized tyres to find an improvement. > Ideally I want the same suspension 'feel' > as the 318 transposing onto mine, but my car weighs probably 300kg more so > simply using 318 components might not work ideally. It'd sink to the bumpstops! I bet the 318i was an SE? > I have obtained some > standard 6 cylinder struts (springs with three red marks) part number > 1096855/6 and some rear springs from a 323 coupe (two blue marks) all for > GBP60 from a breaker in the hope that I can emulate that 318 ride. Be interesting to know how it works. Being a convertible and an auto, you've got one the of heaviest E46 going (330d conv auto being heaviest) so you might find it'll sit a bit low at the front and very low at the back. You'd be better off with the rear springs from a Touring. as Convertibles are about as heavy in the back as the Touring while Coupes are the lightest of the lot. -- Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
"Scott M" > wrote in message ... > David Haggas wrote: > >> Many thanks for all that information. Yes lots of different combinations >> but I wonder about the actual spring rate difference when we are talking >> about perhaps the difference between say a few bags of luggage and an >> extra person's weight over the axle. > > It is an odd thing to specify so many different spring rates when, as you > say, the usage of the car affects its weight far more than whether or not > its got aircon, but that really is how they do it! > > >> I suppose for real world differences there's no substitute for trying >> different set-ups. I have a 2002 330 convertible auto with M sports >> package 2 and my intention - after 5 years of being badly shaken on >> appallingly maintained British roads - is to soften the ride and make the >> car more pleasurable to drive over long distances. > > The E46 Sport suspension is noted as being too bloody hard. I've got a > 320d SE and that bashes and crashes more than I'd like sometimes so I > can't begin to imagine what the Sport is like. > > >> I drove a friend's 318 coupe manual with the same 18 inch staggered >> wheels and tyres (255/35 and 225/40) as my car and it rode beautifully so >> I can rule out the wheel tyre combination, although I recognise changing >> these to 17 would improve things further. > > Not really. The big step difference for the effect of tyre size on comfort > comes with sidewall shape. 50+ profile tyres with their curved sidewalls > are inherently 'softer' than the flat sided 45-and-below profiles. For an > E46 this is the jump between 16" and 17" rims - and I think 16s don't fit > on a 330i because of the brake disc size (certainly the case for the > 330d.) I've gone the other way on mine (16" to 17" rims) and, with the > natural stiffness of the SE, it actually didn't make that much odds. With > a Sport you'd have to go down to balloon sized tyres to find an > improvement. > > >> Ideally I want the same suspension 'feel' as the 318 transposing onto >> mine, but my car weighs probably 300kg more so simply using 318 >> components might not work ideally. > > It'd sink to the bumpstops! I bet the 318i was an SE? > > >> I have obtained some standard 6 cylinder struts (springs with three red >> marks) part number 1096855/6 and some rear springs from a 323 coupe (two >> blue marks) all for GBP60 from a breaker in the hope that I can emulate >> that 318 ride. > > Be interesting to know how it works. Being a convertible and an auto, > you've got one the of heaviest E46 going (330d conv auto being heaviest) > so you might find it'll sit a bit low at the front and very low at the > back. You'd be better off with the rear springs from a Touring. as > Convertibles are about as heavy in the back as the Touring while Coupes > are the lightest of the lot. > > -- > Scott ------------- I agree about the sport being too bloody hard that's for sure. BMW GB's marketing was so successful that it almost all well equipped 330 models were m sport package but for UK roads they are a nonsense. My experience with the 318 shows that the 18 inch wheels can be fine. If I did go to 17's I would fit 225/50 all round. When you say 318 springs would make it "sink to the bumpstops" it would be an interesting trial. I took 4 large adults in a 99 318 saloon and it rode better than when empty! These people's weight would add up to more than the 318/330 difference and most of it directly over the rear axle...The coupe I drove in is an 02 - they didn't have the 'SE' then but I think it will be the same ie standard suspension. The struts I have are off a convertible but the rears are off a coupe. Should be getting them swapped so will let you know how I get on. If the rears are too soft I can get some touring/convertible ones easily enough. Do you know about the wishbone differences? M sport are not the same part numbers but I am assuming they are stronger (thicker?) rather than significantly different geometry-wise David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
David Haggas wrote:
> When you say 318 springs would make it "sink to the bumpstops" it would be > an interesting trial. I took 4 large adults in a 99 318 saloon and it rode > better than when empty! These people's weight would add up to more than the > 318/330 difference and most of it directly over the rear axle...The coupe I > drove in is an 02 - they didn't have the 'SE' then but I think it will be > the same ie standard suspension. I use SE as being non-Sport really! It's a point about the weight thing; people are heavy. I may have exaggerated the bumpstop thing, but the car would sit lower for a given weight. > The struts I have are off a convertible but the rears are off a coupe. > Should be getting them swapped so will let you know how I get on. If the > rears are too soft I can get some touring/convertible ones easily enough. Do > you know about the wishbone differences? M sport are not the same part > numbers but I am assuming they are stronger (thicker?) rather than > significantly different geometry-wise Oooh, that's a point. The wishbone differences will be geometry; from looking at them I'd be guessing the chief difference would the angle the rear lug (that mounts in the lollipop bush) meets the main part. I suppose with higher suspension from a lighter car the two could cancel out and ride height could end up back to what it is now - which would keep the wishbone geometry happy. -- Scott Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
"Scott M" > wrote in message ... > I use SE as being non-Sport really! It's a point about the weight thing; > people are heavy. I may have exaggerated the bumpstop thing, but the car > would sit lower for a given weight. > > >> The struts I have are off a convertible but the rears are off a coupe. >> Should be getting them swapped so will let you know how I get on. If the >> rears are too soft I can get some touring/convertible ones easily enough. >> Do you know about the wishbone differences? M sport are not the same part >> numbers but I am assuming they are stronger (thicker?) rather than >> significantly different geometry-wise > > Oooh, that's a point. The wishbone differences will be geometry; from > looking at them I'd be guessing the chief difference would the angle the > rear lug (that mounts in the lollipop bush) meets the main part. I suppose > with higher suspension from a lighter car the two could cancel out and > ride height could end up back to what it is now - which would keep the > wishbone geometry happy. ------------ Searched around forums and from what I've read you are right about the angle. Also better longer-lasting bushes in the sport versions. What you say about the higher suspension correcting the geometry sounds encouraging but do you think there is still a possibility of uneven tyre wear or other consequences? Maybe its a case of try it and see. David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
David Haggas wrote:
> "Scott M" > wrote in message > ... >> I use SE as being non-Sport really! It's a point about the weight thing; >> people are heavy. I may have exaggerated the bumpstop thing, but the car >> would sit lower for a given weight. >> >> >>> The struts I have are off a convertible but the rears are off a coupe. >>> Should be getting them swapped so will let you know how I get on. If the >>> rears are too soft I can get some touring/convertible ones easily enough. >>> Do you know about the wishbone differences? M sport are not the same part >>> numbers but I am assuming they are stronger (thicker?) rather than >>> significantly different geometry-wise >> Oooh, that's a point. The wishbone differences will be geometry; from >> looking at them I'd be guessing the chief difference would the angle the >> rear lug (that mounts in the lollipop bush) meets the main part. I suppose >> with higher suspension from a lighter car the two could cancel out and >> ride height could end up back to what it is now - which would keep the >> wishbone geometry happy. > > ------------ > > Searched around forums and from what I've read you are right about the > angle. Also better longer-lasting bushes in the sport versions. What you say > about the higher suspension correcting the geometry sounds encouraging but > do you think there is still a possibility of uneven tyre wear or other > consequences? Tyre wear is mostly down to toe settings (which can be corrected, natch). My old E36 on MTech suspension had a hell of a camber on the back wheels but wore them evenly (when I got the rear tracking sorted!) The alternative is to find someone with standard suspension and do a full swap. Or try it and, in due course, replace the wishbones as the balljoints don't last forever anyway. -- Scott Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
"Scott M" > wrote in message ... > Tyre wear is mostly down to toe settings (which can be corrected, natch). > My old E36 on MTech suspension had a hell of a camber on the back wheels > but wore them evenly (when I got the rear tracking sorted!) > > The alternative is to find someone with standard suspension and do a full > swap. > > Or try it and, in due course, replace the wishbones as the balljoints > don't last forever anyway. --------------------- Yes, will have a good look at the joints when replacing springs but the car feels well damped in spite of rigid ride. Ideally I need to find someone with an SE who wants to swap everything but its a little low cost experiment so if it works to mitigate things then I'm happy. Remaining M sport spec stuff (correct me if I'm wrong) would be rear shocks, anti roll bars/mounts and the wishbones. The convertible is also a very rigid beast but I am hoping that it will be the springs that will make the biggest difference, followed perhaps by 50 profile tyres. Thanks David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
E46 Coils and shocks
Scott M > wrote:
>The E46 Sport suspension is noted as being too bloody hard. I've got a >320d SE and that bashes and crashes more than I'd like sometimes so I >can't begin to imagine what the Sport is like. It's not that hard. Firm, but impressively compliant, in my opinion. "Bashing and crashing" is does not do at all. Just want I want, in a sports sedan. Certainly softer than what a true "sports car" has. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2003 GTI coils | vwgopher | VW water cooled | 1 | December 5th 05 05:17 AM |
2003 GTI coils | vwgopher | VW water cooled | 3 | December 2nd 05 09:35 PM |
Self-leveling Shocks vs. Gas Shocks | Scott | BMW | 6 | September 14th 05 07:57 AM |
Coils vs. Coilovers | [email protected] | Honda | 1 | April 29th 05 04:26 PM |
Coils vs. Coilovers | [email protected] | Honda | 6 | April 27th 05 01:56 AM |