If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doing ANYTHING!!!!
I was lokking thorugh the Subaru manual to find out where the thermostat
was. I'm used to it being on TOP of the engine. While it ididn't show the location, it did say, "Remove negative battery terminal, and remove thermostat housing..." Huh? Remove the - terminal berfore removing the thermostat housing?! WTF?!?! Last night I went to pick up my papers for my "paper route" and saw a big-ass GMC pickup I hadn't seen before. Then I saw one of my firend's fathers, who started doing the papers about 10 days after I did. He usually drive an '01 Pathfinder. "Where's the Pathfinder?" "I wrecked it." "WHAT?!?!?!?!" Well, he didn't really wreck it. He had a bad bulb in the overhead light. He removed the lens, and the bulb was in pieces, but still working intermittantly. He removed the bulb and replaced the lens, and then tried to start the truck. No Go. The starter spins, but the engine doesn't catch. Looks like he fried the ECU!!!! All the other lights work, the dome light works, but the fuel pumpo doesn't energize. He tried the reset procedure and nothing. I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but someone shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
Hachiroku ハチ*ク wrote:
> I was lokking thorugh the Subaru manual to find out where the thermostat > was. I'm used to it being on TOP of the engine. > > While it ididn't show the location, it did say, "Remove negative battery > terminal, and remove thermostat housing..." > > Huh? Remove the - terminal berfore removing the thermostat housing?! WTF?!?! > > Last night I went to pick up my papers for my "paper route" and saw a > big-ass GMC pickup I hadn't seen before. Then I saw one of my firend's > fathers, who started doing the papers about 10 days after I did. He > usually drive an '01 Pathfinder. > > "Where's the Pathfinder?" "I wrecked it." "WHAT?!?!?!?!" > > Well, he didn't really wreck it. He had a bad bulb in the overhead light. > He removed the lens, and the bulb was in pieces, but still working > intermittantly. He removed the bulb and replaced the lens, and then tried > to start the truck. No Go. The starter spins, but the engine doesn't catch. > > Looks like he fried the ECU!!!! All the other lights work, the dome light > works, but the fuel pumpo doesn't energize. He tried the reset procedure > and nothing. > > I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but someone > shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... > > Typical dome light bulb is a dual contact base, he may have caused a momentary short circuit to ground removing the broken bulb. Sounds far-fetched, but possible that that could have damaged something. nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
Hachiroku wrote:
<snip crap> > I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but someone > shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of direct lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a single damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going anywhere and it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
jim beam wrote:
> Hachiroku wrote: > <snip crap> > >> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >> someone >> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... > > > no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're > electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including > battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of direct > lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a single > damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going anywhere and > it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. Hi, No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, anything is possible. In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doing ANYTHING!!!!
"Tony Hwang" > wrote in message news:6DtZi.198872$th2.150458@pd7urf3no... > jim beam wrote: > >> Hachiroku wrote: >> <snip crap> >> >>> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>> someone >>> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >> >> >> no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're >> electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including >> battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of direct >> lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a single >> damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going anywhere and >> it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. > Hi, > No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, anything is > possible. In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result > unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. Bull****!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
Mike wrote:
> "Tony Hwang" > wrote in message > news:6DtZi.198872$th2.150458@pd7urf3no... > >>jim beam wrote: >> >> >>>Hachiroku wrote: >>><snip crap> >>> >>>>I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>>>someone >>>>shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >>> >>> >>>no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're >>>electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including >>>battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of direct >>>lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a single >>>damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going anywhere and >>>it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. >> >>Hi, >>No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, anything is >>possible. In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result >>unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. > > > > Bull****!! > > Hmmm, Live little longer and gain some more experience! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
Tony Hwang wrote:
> jim beam wrote: > >> Hachiroku wrote: >> <snip crap> >> >>> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>> someone >>> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >> >> >> no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're >> electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including >> battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of >> direct lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a >> single damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going >> anywhere and it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. > Hi, > No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, short won't cause voltage surge. measure the voltage across a battery as you increase current load - voltage goes down, not up. only other potential source of surge is back emf from relays, motors, etc, and they're all diode/condenser protected, as is the ecu. bottom line: it's not the dome light. > anything is > possible. yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. > In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result > unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
jim beam wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote: > >> jim beam wrote: >> >>> Hachiroku wrote: >>> <snip crap> >>> >>>> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>>> someone >>>> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >>> >>> >>> >>> no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and they're >>> electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", including >>> battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. short of >>> direct lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of which have a >>> single damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's not going >>> anywhere and it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a bulb change. >> >> Hi, >> No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, > > > short won't cause voltage surge. measure the voltage across a battery > as you increase current load - voltage goes down, not up. only other > potential source of surge is back emf from relays, motors, etc, and > they're all diode/condenser protected, as is the ecu. bottom line: it's > not the dome light. > > >> anything is possible. > > > yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. > >> In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result >> unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. > > > yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. hmmm, Whatever you think. A car battery has lots of energy in it. Think current in this case. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
Tony Hwang wrote:
> jim beam wrote: >> Tony Hwang wrote: >> >>> jim beam wrote: >>> >>>> Hachiroku wrote: >>>> <snip crap> >>>> >>>>> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>>>> someone >>>>> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and >>>> they're electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", >>>> including battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. >>>> short of direct lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of >>>> which have a single damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's >>>> not going anywhere and it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by a >>>> bulb change. >>> >>> Hi, >>> No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, >> >> >> short won't cause voltage surge. measure the voltage across a battery >> as you increase current load - voltage goes down, not up. only other >> potential source of surge is back emf from relays, motors, etc, and >> they're all diode/condenser protected, as is the ecu. bottom line: >> it's not the dome light. >> >> >>> anything is possible. >> >> >> yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. >> >>> In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result >>> unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. >> >> >> yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. > hmmm, > Whatever you think. A car battery has lots of energy in it. > Think current in this case. do what i said - measure voltage as a function of load. then report your results. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why you should remove the negative battery terminal before doingANYTHING!!!!
jim beam wrote:
> Tony Hwang wrote: > >> jim beam wrote: >> >>> Tony Hwang wrote: >>> >>>> jim beam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hachiroku wrote: >>>>> <snip crap> >>>>> >>>>>> I had heard of this before; I can't remember what the car was, but >>>>>> someone >>>>>> shorted out the ECU replacing the dome light... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> no way - the ecu's not even connected to the dome light. and >>>>> they're electrically protected against all kinds of "user error", >>>>> including battery reversal, over-voltage, dead shorts and static. >>>>> short of direct lightning strike, water damage, or fire, none of >>>>> which have a single damned thing to do with dome lights, the ecu's >>>>> not going anywhere and it's /certainly/ not going to be fubared by >>>>> a bulb change. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> No way? If short caused a surge in the electrical system, >>> >>> >>> >>> short won't cause voltage surge. measure the voltage across a >>> battery as you increase current load - voltage goes down, not up. >>> only other potential source of surge is back emf from relays, motors, >>> etc, and they're all diode/condenser protected, as is the ecu. >>> bottom line: it's not the dome light. >>> >>> >>>> anything is possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. >>> >>>> In cases like this mostly nothing serious happens but result >>>> unpredictable. Protection is not absolute 100%. >>> >>> >>> >>> yeah, it could have been hit by meteorite. >> >> hmmm, >> Whatever you think. A car battery has lots of energy in it. >> Think current in this case. > > > do what i said - measure voltage as a function of load. then report > your results. Hmmm, No, current as a function of load! Do you remember the days of generators under the automobile hoods? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Battery terminal short | Paul | Technology | 6 | July 10th 06 05:39 PM |
Battery terminal bolt replacement | [email protected] | Chrysler | 5 | June 15th 06 11:43 PM |
How to change the battery terminal | Jonelle H via CarKB.com | Ford Explorer | 1 | September 5th 05 01:13 PM |
Water on positive battery terminal? | Leon van Dommelen | Mazda | 13 | August 2nd 05 05:10 PM |
1973 THING - what is the ground? Negative or Positive battery terminal? | [email protected] | VW air cooled | 2 | June 25th 05 05:36 PM |