Will it sell?

"Michael Johnson" > wrote in message
...
> Joe wrote:
>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>> :
>>> Zodness wrote:
>>>> "Michael Johnson" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I decided to put my 1989 LX 5.0L on ebay and see what happens. I
>>>>>>>>> never thought this day would come but I really think it is
>>>>>>>>> time to move on to a newer Mustang. I need to get rid of the
>>>>>>>>> old one first since I don't have the garage space for two cars
>>>>>>>>> that would be basically "toys" for the most part. Here's a
>>>>>>>>> link: http://tinyurl.com/2acoet
>>>>>>>> You traitorous rat *******! I thought you were going to leave it
>>>>>>>> to me in your will...
>>>>>>> Stand in line. I have youngsters in the family that are very
>>>>>>> upset with me right now. They thought it would be one of theirs
>>>>>>> one day too. The trouble with them is they have ridden in (and in
>>>>>>> some cases even driven) the car and know how well 460 ft-lbs of
>>>>>>> torque can light up the rear wheels and pin you back in the seat
>>>>>>> during hard acceleration.
>>>>>> Seriously, I'd keep it. A car like that is a family heirloom, not
>>>>>> to mention a real fun toy.
>>>>> I want a convertible and I simply don't have the space in the garage
>>>>> for two cars. Plus, the newer cars are very good performers and in
>>>>> reality are just better cars period. It also helps that I really
>>>>> like the looks of the new Mustangs.
>>>> New ones have air bags both sides, smother ride. And all the parts
>>>> are new. I did not like the throttle response of the new ones, nor
>>>> the drone of the muffler. Perhaps 09 ?? Few like to ride in my 93
>>>> 5.0 8# (modded ex cop
>>> Poor throttle response on the new cars is a common complaint. Thottles
>>> on the new ones are controlled by electronics and not an
>>> actual cable connection from the accelerator pedal to the throttle
>>> body. The after market tuners chips can resolve this issue through
>>> revisions to the computer programming. Actually, the new Stangs get
>>> 20-30 rwhp from a custom tune and better drivability to boot.
>>>
>>>> car) because suspension is stiff, and is too quick for them. Scares
>>>> most people. I like it. Rough and fast, somewhat not new inside, and
>>>> cheap faded blue paint shot over the black and white. (except for
>>>> the performance type of people). Great around town fast.
>>> The fox Mustangs are really a throw back to the late 60s and early 70s
>>> muscle cars, IMO. They are fun to drive and tough as hell. What is
>>> driving me to get a new one is that I have had convertibles on and off
>>> since I was in college and haven't owned one for 4-5 years and really
>>> want another one.
>>>
>>>> MJ's 89 is a good deal, as all the work is done, drive it for a few
>>>> years for fun, sell it later.
>>
>> So Michael, what are you thinking about? A garden-variety GT
>> convertible, or something a bit more exotic?
>
> Well, I would prefer a GT500 convertible but I just can't justify the
> premium they have put on them. I am leaning toward a Mustang GT or maybe
> one of the specialty Mustangs like a Bullit and then eventually putting a
> Kenne Bell kit on it. I won't go hog wild with the mods again. The KB
> kits are complete and well done cost about $4,000-$5,000 which really is a
> bargain for the power it delivers. A GT with a KB kit delivers
> performance nearly on par with a stock GT500 and for $15k-$20k less
> considering the price of GT500 convertibles.
>
> This being said I will look at all the convertibles in the mid $30k to mid
> $40k range. I'm really not that interested in mega horsepower and just
> want enough to make it a decent performer, something that can run a low
> 14, high 13 second 1/4 mile. I will consider other things like handling,
> build quality, fit and finish, ergonomics etc. Until I drive some cars it
> is hard to say which way I will go. The Mustang does provide a lot of car
> for the money though so I think it has the initial edge. Especially
> considering the after market performance parts it has available.

I was really impressed with the V6 convertible I rented out in Phoenix. No,
not for its power or performance, but purely with the convertible top.
Compared to my '93 GT, Ford got it right. And stealing a trick or two from
BMW didn't hurt.

dwight

dwight wrote:
> "Michael Johnson" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Joe wrote:
>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>> :
>>>> Zodness wrote:
>>>>> "Michael Johnson" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>> Joe wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I decided to put my 1989 LX 5.0L on ebay and see what happens. I
>>>>>>>>>> never thought this day would come but I really think it is
>>>>>>>>>> time to move on to a newer Mustang. I need to get rid of the
>>>>>>>>>> old one first since I don't have the garage space for two cars
>>>>>>>>>> that would be basically "toys" for the most part. Here's a
>>>>>>>>>> link: http://tinyurl.com/2acoet
>>>>>>>>> You traitorous rat *******! I thought you were going to leave it
>>>>>>>>> to me in your will...
>>>>>>>> Stand in line. I have youngsters in the family that are very
>>>>>>>> upset with me right now. They thought it would be one of theirs
>>>>>>>> one day too. The trouble with them is they have ridden in (and in
>>>>>>>> some cases even driven) the car and know how well 460 ft-lbs of
>>>>>>>> torque can light up the rear wheels and pin you back in the seat
>>>>>>>> during hard acceleration.
>>>>>>> Seriously, I'd keep it. A car like that is a family heirloom, not
>>>>>>> to mention a real fun toy.
>>>>>> I want a convertible and I simply don't have the space in the garage
>>>>>> for two cars. Plus, the newer cars are very good performers and in
>>>>>> reality are just better cars period. It also helps that I really
>>>>>> like the looks of the new Mustangs.
>>>>> New ones have air bags both sides, smother ride. And all the parts
>>>>> are new. I did not like the throttle response of the new ones, nor
>>>>> the drone of the muffler. Perhaps 09 ?? Few like to ride in my 93
>>>>> 5.0 8# (modded ex cop
>>>> Poor throttle response on the new cars is a common complaint. Thottles
>>>> on the new ones are controlled by electronics and not an
>>>> actual cable connection from the accelerator pedal to the throttle
>>>> body. The after market tuners chips can resolve this issue through
>>>> revisions to the computer programming. Actually, the new Stangs get
>>>> 20-30 rwhp from a custom tune and better drivability to boot.
>>>>
>>>>> car) because suspension is stiff, and is too quick for them. Scares
>>>>> most people. I like it. Rough and fast, somewhat not new inside, and
>>>>> cheap faded blue paint shot over the black and white. (except for
>>>>> the performance type of people). Great around town fast.
>>>> The fox Mustangs are really a throw back to the late 60s and early 70s
>>>> muscle cars, IMO. They are fun to drive and tough as hell. What is
>>>> driving me to get a new one is that I have had convertibles on and off
>>>> since I was in college and haven't owned one for 4-5 years and really
>>>> want another one.
>>>>
>>>>> MJ's 89 is a good deal, as all the work is done, drive it for a few
>>>>> years for fun, sell it later.
>>> So Michael, what are you thinking about? A garden-variety GT
>>> convertible, or something a bit more exotic?
>> Well, I would prefer a GT500 convertible but I just can't justify the
>> premium they have put on them. I am leaning toward a Mustang GT or maybe
>> one of the specialty Mustangs like a Bullit and then eventually putting a
>> Kenne Bell kit on it. I won't go hog wild with the mods again. The KB
>> kits are complete and well done cost about $4,000-$5,000 which really is a
>> bargain for the power it delivers. A GT with a KB kit delivers
>> performance nearly on par with a stock GT500 and for $15k-$20k less
>> considering the price of GT500 convertibles.
>>
>> This being said I will look at all the convertibles in the mid $30k to mid
>> $40k range. I'm really not that interested in mega horsepower and just
>> want enough to make it a decent performer, something that can run a low
>> 14, high 13 second 1/4 mile. I will consider other things like handling,
>> build quality, fit and finish, ergonomics etc. Until I drive some cars it
>> is hard to say which way I will go. The Mustang does provide a lot of car
>> for the money though so I think it has the initial edge. Especially
>> considering the after market performance parts it has available.
>
> I was really impressed with the V6 convertible I rented out in Phoenix. No,
> not for its power or performance, but purely with the convertible top.
> Compared to my '93 GT, Ford got it right. And stealing a trick or two from
> BMW didn't hurt.

I know the SN95 Mustangs had a much better convertible top too. They
really don't have a big downside like they used to in that they rarely
leak and provide great sound and thermal insulation. One thing I want
to check into are some of the hard top convertibles. That is like
having your cake and eating it too.

On Feb 15, 3:25 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
> I decided to put my 1989 LX 5.0L on ebay and see what happens. I never
> thought this day would come but I really think it is time to move on to
> a newer Mustang. I need to get rid of the old one first since I don't
> have the garage space for two cars that would be basically "toys" for
> the most part. Here's a link: http://tinyurl.com/2acoet

Mike,

As good as the new Mustang is, can I still say keep your old '89?
Yes, I can. You have a sweetheart of a car, Mike... don't let it go.
If you're truly on the fence about selling it, read the latest
Hemming's Mustang Machines -- it features original owners and the cars
they've held on to. Cool stuff.

Patrick

wrote:
> On Feb 15, 3:25 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
>> I decided to put my 1989 LX 5.0L on ebay and see what happens. I never
>> thought this day would come but I really think it is time to move on to
>> a newer Mustang. I need to get rid of the old one first since I don't
>> have the garage space for two cars that would be basically "toys" for
>> the most part. Here's a link: http://tinyurl.com/2acoet
>
> Mike,
>
> As good as the new Mustang is, can I still say keep your old '89?
> Yes, I can. You have a sweetheart of a car, Mike... don't let it go.
> If you're truly on the fence about selling it, read the latest
> Hemming's Mustang Machines -- it features original owners and the cars
> they've held on to. Cool stuff.

It wasn't an easy decision to put it on ebay. It did not sell so it is
still in the garage. Driving the car is like putting on an old pair of
blue jeans. If I had it licensed and on the road I probably wouldn't
have tried to sell it.

On Feb 22, 10:21 am, Michael Johnson > wrote:

> > Mike,
>
> > As good as the new Mustang is, can I still say keep your old '89?
> > Yes, I can. You have a sweetheart of a car, Mike... don't let it go.
> > If you're truly on the fence about selling it, read the latest
> > Hemming's Mustang Machines -- it features original owners and the cars
> > they've held on to. Cool stuff.

Correction: Hemming's Muscle Machines.

> It wasn't an easy decision to put it on ebay. It did not sell so it is
> still in the garage. Driving the car is like putting on an old pair of
> blue jeans. If I had it licensed and on the road I probably wouldn't
> have tried to sell it.

You'll never get out of it what you put into it or what it's truly
worth. You don't know anyone with an ol' garage/barn you can stick it
in?

Patrick

wrote:
> On Feb 22, 10:21 am, Michael Johnson > wrote:
>
>>> Mike,
>>> As good as the new Mustang is, can I still say keep your old '89?
>>> Yes, I can. You have a sweetheart of a car, Mike... don't let it go.
>>> If you're truly on the fence about selling it, read the latest
>>> Hemming's Mustang Machines -- it features original owners and the cars
>>> they've held on to. Cool stuff.
>
> Correction: Hemming's Muscle Machines.
>
>> It wasn't an easy decision to put it on ebay. It did not sell so it is
>> still in the garage. Driving the car is like putting on an old pair of
>> blue jeans. If I had it licensed and on the road I probably wouldn't
>> have tried to sell it.
>
> You'll never get out of it what you put into it or what it's truly
> worth. You don't know anyone with an ol' garage/barn you can stick it
> in?

I won't buy another Mustang until the fate of the '89 is known. I have
been known to change my mind quite often.

The Wolf With the Red Roses wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:21:00 -0500, Michael Johnson >
> wrote something wonderfully witty:
>
>> wrote:
>>> On Feb 15, 3:25 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
>>>> I decided to put my 1989 LX 5.0L on ebay and see what happens. I never
>>>> thought this day would come but I really think it is time to move on to
>>>> a newer Mustang. I need to get rid of the old one first since I don't
>>>> have the garage space for two cars that would be basically "toys" for
>>>> the most part. Here's a link: http://tinyurl.com/2acoet
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> As good as the new Mustang is, can I still say keep your old '89?
>>> Yes, I can. You have a sweetheart of a car, Mike... don't let it go.
>>> If you're truly on the fence about selling it, read the latest
>>> Hemming's Mustang Machines -- it features original owners and the cars
>>> they've held on to. Cool stuff.
>> It wasn't an easy decision to put it on ebay. It did not sell so it is
>> still in the garage. Driving the car is like putting on an old pair of
>> blue jeans. If I had it licensed and on the road I probably wouldn't
>> have tried to sell it.
>>
> But you didn't try to sell it. You tried to get your money back. It
> is a labor of love, which has to find a new lover. One day some time
> some where a guy with a chub & a wad will ask you a question, and
> you'll give him an answer. On the way home you stifle a little
> sniffle and look for your next project. So it goes with all of em.

The biggest reason the car may not sell is that it isn't licensed. It
is the test drive that will sell it. I can also remove the blower and
sell many of the speed parts individually and make as much if not more
than my current asking price.

On Feb 15, 9:18 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
> elaich wrote:
> > Michael Johnson > wrote in
> m:
> ...
....
>
> The car will sell to someone that knows their way around modding a
> Mustang in a serious nature. Too many have no clue as to the cost and
> work associated with putting a seriously modified car together. I'm not
> looking for those that a) don't have the money to spend and b) doesn't
> know the true value of the modifications. Price out the mods I have
> listed and consider the good condition the car is in and any serious
> buyer will know the price is more than reasonable. If someone is
> looking to steal it then they need to move on. ...

True, except the person you describe is very picky about the details
of the mod. Their "perfect" car will be somewhat different even if
they
have similar views of what to do to that car. Also, they would want
to
do it themselves - isn't part of the fun of owning a modified car the
trading of stories with other owners? You would not have much fun
at a gathering if your answer to every question about the car is "I
bought
it that way."

B

bml wrote:
> On Feb 15, 9:18 pm, Michael Johnson > wrote:
>> elaich wrote:
>>> Michael Johnson > wrote in
>>> :
>> ...
> ...
>> The car will sell to someone that knows their way around modding a
>> Mustang in a serious nature. Too many have no clue as to the cost and
>> work associated with putting a seriously modified car together. I'm not
>> looking for those that a) don't have the money to spend and b) doesn't
>> know the true value of the modifications. Price out the mods I have
>> listed and consider the good condition the car is in and any serious
>> buyer will know the price is more than reasonable. If someone is
>> looking to steal it then they need to move on. ...
>
> True, except the person you describe is very picky about the details
> of the mod. Their "perfect" car will be somewhat different even if
> they
> have similar views of what to do to that car. Also, they would want
> to
> do it themselves - isn't part of the fun of owning a modified car the
> trading of stories with other owners? You would not have much fun
> at a gathering if your answer to every question about the car is "I
> bought
> it that way."

The car has to be licensed and road worthy before it will sell, IMO.
I'm actually glad it is still in the garage but having a new GT in there
wouldn't upset me either. I am going to remove the blower and a few
other parts and sell them on ebay or locally. Then get the car running
N/A and maybe make another run at selling it. Then again, once it is on
the road I may not be able to bring myself to sell it and I will be back
on the original plan of installing 351W stroker engine.