A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Simulators
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

rF2: The quest for new ways to be miserable continues!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 12th 12, 10:15 AM posted to rec.autos.simulators
Andrew MacPherson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 287
Default rF2: The quest for new ways to be miserable continues!

Graphics: it's like a modding team took rF1 to the edges of what it was capable of.
Good, if you were expecting a much improved rF1, but DX9 is capable of much better.
The programmers here... well, they've tried their best, but unfortunately sometimes
your best isn't really good enough. I had the same problem with GTR Evo... it just
looked out of date from the start.

Physics: FFB is not right in the way that iRacing is almost immediately "right".
Which is a shame, because although I'm struggling with the Historic cars, the
Megane shows an awful lot of potential under the hood.

Or rather, under the wheel arches. I really do think this tyre model is better than
iRacing's at the moment. The car handles more believably under stress and duress --
to me -- and would be a joy to drive if the FFB felt more convincing.

Some people on the forums love the FFB though, however it's hard to know what
they're comparing it to, or whether specific hardware is a big deal.

Atmosphe perhaps the biggest hit so far. Dynamically changing weather and
lighting really move the genre forward, and I've even enjoyed thrashing around in
the (graphically poor) rain in the Megane. Again the tyre physics handle very
impressively and when I aquaplaned at one stage it just felt and looked right.

Sounds from the surroundings are well done too, they really do add something I
didn't think I'd been missing.

Anyway, that's it so far. I'm disappointed and I'm very pleased at the same time.
As ever, it's hard to be simply happy in this hobby. In fact I suspect we have this
hobby purely because we don't want to be happy. ;-)

Still, it was easily worth my 30ukp, and I'm very much looking forward to seeing
what the more talented modders can do with this engine. It has bags of potential...
though at this stage you'd hope for a bit more than that. There's probably nothing
beta about this release apart from a few tweaks and a lot of content.

Andrew McP
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I was trying not to expect too much from rF2, but... Andrew MacPherson[_2_] Simulators 33 July 15th 11 08:55 AM
rF2 Screenies Uwe Simulators 15 April 28th 10 05:10 PM
Some miserable SOB got my gas again! Mike Romain Jeep 35 June 10th 05 04:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.