Mustangs are awesome

"Joe" > wrote in message
...
> "dwight" > wrote in news:AtKdnRfX3OGzK4XZRVn-
> :
>
>> "Punky" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>> What???
>>>
>>
>> Should I type louder?
>>
>> dwight
>
> Use caps.
>
> BTW, heading to the Ft. Lauderdale IAS this weekend. Big preview thing
> in today's paper; the Camaro is supposed to be there. Nothing about the
> Challenger, but I fully expect to have an extended visit with the GT500.

And only $6.00? That's a beautiful convention center they have there.

I'll bet your extended visit goes about as well as mine - look, but don't
touch.

dwight
http://home.comcast.net/~tfrog93/images/images.htm (my extended visit)

"dwight" > wrote in
:

>
> "Joe" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "dwight" > wrote in news:AtKdnRfX3OGzK4XZRVn-
>> :
>>
>>> "Punky" > wrote in message
>>> oups.com...
>>>> What???
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should I type louder?
>>>
>>> dwight
>>
>> Use caps.
>>
>> BTW, heading to the Ft. Lauderdale IAS this weekend. Big preview
>> thing in today's paper; the Camaro is supposed to be there. Nothing
>> about the Challenger, but I fully expect to have an extended visit
>> with the GT500.
>
> And only $6.00? That's a beautiful convention center they have there.

Yeah, it's pretty nice. And since I have 1/2-off coupons, it's only $3
admission. Hell, parking will be more than admission...

Only bad thing about the Convention Center is that it's inside Port
Everglades, so you have to show all kinds of documentation and have a
nice little chat with the police just to get near the place.

> I'll bet your extended visit goes about as well as mine - look, but
> don't touch.
>
> dwight
> http://home.comcast.net/~tfrog93/images/images.htm (my extended visit)

I'm sure you're right. That thing will be way off limits to us peons.

BTW, nice pix on the web site. Glad you made them pop. On an OT note -
love the Jag, although the front end in that side shot looks a bit too
much like an Eclipse...

"Joe" > wrote in message
...
> "dwight" > wrote in
> :
>
>>
>> "Joe" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "dwight" > wrote in news:AtKdnRfX3OGzK4XZRVn-
>>> :
>>>
>>>> "Punky" > wrote in message
>>>> oups.com...
>>>>> What???
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should I type louder?
>>>>
>>>> dwight
>>>
>>> Use caps.
>>>
>>> BTW, heading to the Ft. Lauderdale IAS this weekend. Big preview
>>> thing in today's paper; the Camaro is supposed to be there. Nothing
>>> about the Challenger, but I fully expect to have an extended visit
>>> with the GT500.
>>
>> And only $6.00? That's a beautiful convention center they have there.
>
> Yeah, it's pretty nice. And since I have 1/2-off coupons, it's only $3
> admission. Hell, parking will be more than admission...
>
> Only bad thing about the Convention Center is that it's inside Port
> Everglades, so you have to show all kinds of documentation and have a
> nice little chat with the police just to get near the place.
>
>> I'll bet your extended visit goes about as well as mine - look, but
>> don't touch.
>>
>> dwight
>> http://home.comcast.net/~tfrog93/images/images.htm (my extended visit)
>
> I'm sure you're right. That thing will be way off limits to us peons.
>
> BTW, nice pix on the web site. Glad you made them pop. On an OT note -
> love the Jag, although the front end in that side shot looks a bit too
> much like an Eclipse...

Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they came from
the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so you can
imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.

The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is paid to
the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear end (especially
on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like it's just hanging.
What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that the lines flow from the tip
of the nose to the rear quarters, up and over the trunk and back around to
the front. It's a "finished" product.

dwight

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:44:53 -0500, "dwight" >
wrote:
<snip>
>
>Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they came from
>the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so you can
>imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.
>
>The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
>complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is paid to
>the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear end (especially
>on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like it's just hanging.
>What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that the lines flow from the tip
>of the nose to the rear quarters, up and over the trunk and back around to
>the front. It's a "finished" product.
>
>dwight
>
Makes you wain nostalgic for the days of big ass rocket ship fins does
it?

Without a doubt the fat ass on the latest incarnation of the Corvette
is my least favorite part of the car.
--

December 9, 2005 (CNN) While interviewing an anonymous
US Special Forces soldier, a Reuters News agent asked
the soldier what he felt when sniping members of Al Quaeda
in Afghanistan.

The soldier shrugged and replied, "Recoil." (Possible Urban Legend)

Zombywoof > wrote in
:

> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:44:53 -0500, "dwight" >
> wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>>Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they came
>>from the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so
>>you can imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.
>>
>>The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
>>complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is
>>paid to the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear end
>>(especially on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like
>>it's just hanging. What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that
>>the lines flow from the tip of the nose to the rear quarters, up and
>>over the trunk and back around to the front. It's a "finished"
>>product.
>>
>>dwight
>>
> Makes you wain nostalgic for the days of big ass rocket ship fins does
> it?
>
> Without a doubt the fat ass on the latest incarnation of the Corvette
> is my least favorite part of the car.

Jags have been consistently the best looking cars available IMO.

Speaking of fat asses, the Mustang has one helluvone. Much more so than
the Corvette, which is a damn nice looking car.

2 cents as always..

On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:01:03 GMT, Joe > wrote:

>Zombywoof > wrote in
:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:44:53 -0500, "dwight" >
>> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>
>>>Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they came
>>>from the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so
>>>you can imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.
>>>
>>>The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
>>>complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is
>>>paid to the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear end
>>>(especially on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like
>>>it's just hanging. What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that
>>>the lines flow from the tip of the nose to the rear quarters, up and
>>>over the trunk and back around to the front. It's a "finished"
>>>product.
>>>
>>>dwight
>>>
>> Makes you wain nostalgic for the days of big ass rocket ship fins does
>> it?
>>
>> Without a doubt the fat ass on the latest incarnation of the Corvette
>> is my least favorite part of the car.
>
>Jags have been consistently the best looking cars available IMO.
>
I've always, always loved Jags, unfortunately all I can afford are the
low-end Ford versions, so no ownership here.

>Speaking of fat asses, the Mustang has one helluvone. Much more so than
>the Corvette, which is a damn nice looking car.
>
Nah the Vette's ass is waaaay fater then the Stang. When it comes to
the new Vette, baby does indeed got back.

>2 cents as always..
>
Inflation has sunk it to .08 cents
--

December 9, 2005 (CNN) While interviewing an anonymous
US Special Forces soldier, a Reuters News agent asked
the soldier what he felt when sniping members of Al Quaeda
in Afghanistan.

The soldier shrugged and replied, "Recoil." (Possible Urban Legend)

Zombywoof > wrote in
:

> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:01:03 GMT, Joe > wrote:
>
>>Zombywoof > wrote in
m:
>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:44:53 -0500, "dwight" >
>>> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they
came
>>>>from the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so
>>>>you can imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.
>>>>
>>>>The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
>>>>complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is
>>>>paid to the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear
end
>>>>(especially on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like
>>>>it's just hanging. What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that
>>>>the lines flow from the tip of the nose to the rear quarters, up and
>>>>over the trunk and back around to the front. It's a "finished"
>>>>product.
>>>>
>>>>dwight
>>>>
>>> Makes you wain nostalgic for the days of big ass rocket ship fins
does
>>> it?
>>>
>>> Without a doubt the fat ass on the latest incarnation of the
Corvette
>>> is my least favorite part of the car.
>>
>>Jags have been consistently the best looking cars available IMO.
>>
> I've always, always loved Jags, unfortunately all I can afford are the
> low-end Ford versions, so no ownership here.
>
>>Speaking of fat asses, the Mustang has one helluvone. Much more so
than
>>the Corvette, which is a damn nice looking car.
>>
> Nah the Vette's ass is waaaay fater then the Stang. When it comes to
> the new Vette, baby does indeed got back.

Guess we'll agree to disagree, ZW.

>>2 cents as always..
>>
> Inflation has sunk it to .08 cents

Yah, tell me about it..

On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:14:00 GMT, Joe > wrote:

>Zombywoof > wrote in
:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:01:03 GMT, Joe > wrote:
>>
>>>Zombywoof > wrote in
:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 08:44:53 -0500, "dwight" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>Other than the occasional cropping, the pictures are just as they
>came
>>>>>from the camera. Where possible, I prefer to shoot without flash, so
>>>>>you can imagine that there were plenty I ended up deleting.
>>>>>
>>>>>The Jaguar is stunning in person. But that brings up one of my big
>>>>>complaints about mainstream cars these days - a lot of attention is
>>>>>paid to the front of the car, occasionally the sides, but the rear
>end
>>>>>(especially on FWD sedans) always looks like an afterthought - like
>>>>>it's just hanging. What makes a design like the Jaguar work is that
>>>>>the lines flow from the tip of the nose to the rear quarters, up and
>>>>>over the trunk and back around to the front. It's a "finished"
>>>>>product.
>>>>>
>>>>>dwight
>>>>>
>>>> Makes you wain nostalgic for the days of big ass rocket ship fins
>does
>>>> it?
>>>>
>>>> Without a doubt the fat ass on the latest incarnation of the
>Corvette
>>>> is my least favorite part of the car.
>>>
>>>Jags have been consistently the best looking cars available IMO.
>>>
>> I've always, always loved Jags, unfortunately all I can afford are the
>> low-end Ford versions, so no ownership here.
>>
>>>Speaking of fat asses, the Mustang has one helluvone. Much more so
>than
>>>the Corvette, which is a damn nice looking car.
>>>
>> Nah the Vette's ass is waaaay fater then the Stang. When it comes to
>> the new Vette, baby does indeed got back.
>
>Guess we'll agree to disagree, ZW.
>
Nuttin wrong wid dat, no accounting for taste anyway's.

>>>2 cents as always..
>>>
>> Inflation has sunk it to .08 cents
>
>Yah, tell me about it..
>
I'd actually prefer not to think about it.
--

December 9, 2005 (CNN) While interviewing an anonymous
US Special Forces soldier, a Reuters News agent asked
the soldier what he felt when sniping members of Al Quaeda
in Afghanistan.

The soldier shrugged and replied, "Recoil." (Possible Urban Legend)