If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly it's
a really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all the reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to the BMW 3-series. The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great feature, I agree. Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a very specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle has a great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, think "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make the assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? I would really like to see the day where a friend of mine could roll up in a new Cadillac or Lincoln or whatever and I'd look it over and take it for a spin and then say "f**k yeah, America's back!" But with advertising blunders like this... never mind the merits of the car, how can you succeed when you're in effect acknowledging that you're playing follow-the-leader to your most direct competitor? Or does Caddy's marketing department not agree with what seems to be obvious to everyone else, namely that the ATS is specifically designed to win over current and potential 3-series drivers? nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
... > Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly it's a > really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all the > reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to the > BMW 3-series. > > The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that > apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great feature, > I agree. > > Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in > the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. > > Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a very > specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle has a > great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, think > "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make the > assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? The Tucker had such a feature nearly 70 years ago. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
On Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:14:00 PM UTC-5, . wrote:
> "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message > > ... > > > Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly it's a > > > really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all the > > > reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to the > > > BMW 3-series. > > > > > > The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that > > > apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great feature, > > > I agree. > > > > > > Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in > > > the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. > > > > > > Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a very > > > specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle has a > > > great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, think > > > "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make the > > > assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? > > > > The Tucker had such a feature nearly 70 years ago. Citroen had them too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
.. wrote:
> "Nate > wrote in message > ... >> Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly it's a >> really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all the >> reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to the >> BMW 3-series. >> >> The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that >> apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great feature, >> I agree. >> >> Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in >> the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. >> >> Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a very >> specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle has a >> great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, think >> "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make the >> assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? > > The Tucker had such a feature nearly 70 years ago. > you beat me to it! GW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
On 06/27/2013 05:19 PM, Geoff Welsh wrote:
> . wrote: >> "Nate > wrote in message >> ... >>> Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly >>> it's a >>> really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all the >>> reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to the >>> BMW 3-series. >>> >>> The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that >>> apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great >>> feature, >>> I agree. >>> >>> Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in >>> the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. >>> >>> Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a >>> very >>> specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle has a >>> great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, think >>> "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make the >>> assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? >> >> The Tucker had such a feature nearly 70 years ago. >> > > you beat me to it! > GW You guys are right, of course, my point was that I just don't see the point of advertising features that your main competition has had for years. Then again, if I *did* understand what was good advertising, I'd be a lot more affluent than I am. To be fair, I don't get BMW's recent price-based advertising campaign, and my local BMW dealer's own ads are not borderline offensive, they *are* offensive (the one that they run over and over is basically a well dressed couple showing up outside a club apparently for a night on the town, lady spots douchey looking guy in a new red 3er convertible, then cut to shot of her getting in convertible with douche behind the wheel. I mean, really! No, I don't patronize that dealership.) nate -- replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply. http://members.cox.net/njnagel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
GM's marketing makes no sense
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:07:45 -0400, Nate Nagel >
wrote: >Just saw an ad for the Caddy ATS on TV late last night. Supposedly it's >a really nice little car; I don't know, I haven't driven one. But all >the reviews I've read/watched position it as a legitimate competitor to >the BMW 3-series. > >The specific ad that I saw made a big deal out of the headlights that >apparently swivel slightly to follow the road. Which is a great >feature, I agree. > >Difficulty: the BMW 3er has had "adaptive headlights" since sometime in >the middle of the E46 (two generations ago) production run. > >Now WHY if you are aiming a vehicle at a target market of owners of a >very specific popular vehicle, would you advertise that *your* vehicle >has a great new feature when your target market is going to see that ad, >think "oh, really, my ten year old BMW has that" and immediately make >the assumption that Cadillac is playing catch-up to BMW? > >I would really like to see the day where a friend of mine could roll up >in a new Cadillac or Lincoln or whatever and I'd look it over and take >it for a spin and then say "f**k yeah, America's back!" But with >advertising blunders like this... never mind the merits of the car, how >can you succeed when you're in effect acknowledging that you're playing >follow-the-leader to your most direct competitor? > >Or does Caddy's marketing department not agree with what seems to be >obvious to everyone else, namely that the ATS is specifically designed >to win over current and potential 3-series drivers? > >nate As you said, two markets, those who own BMW who might be talked into switching, and those who don't but who might buy either a BMW or New Caddy. So that ad would be aimed at the "those who don't" who probably don't know if or how long either car has had that feature. There really are very few new features of any substance on any of the new cars other then electronic crap no one actually needs. So what can you advertise? Bun warmers, bluetooth, powered lift gates. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GM marketing ability | pj | Corvette | 11 | December 20th 08 05:27 AM |
"Vue makes good sense for families" | Mike | Saturn | 3 | January 8th 08 02:25 AM |
New Scans - Energy Content in a Gallon of Fuel - Why E-85 Makes No Sense Graohic.jpg 300398 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | April 1st 07 04:04 PM |
Mileage that makes no sense | Paul Ciszek | Driving | 8 | July 26th 06 10:49 PM |
Online Marketing | Sinan Buick | Antique cars | 0 | November 29th 04 11:16 PM |