If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Car failed to start yesterday afternoon. First proper fail to proceed
in 8 years. Not too shabby. However, I suspect the immobiliser is playing up. It cranked fine (for as long as I could be bothered holding the key!) and I could hear the fuel lift pump so I'm suspecting the immobiliser is playing up :-(( AA man arrived in good time and, after setting off the alarm by entering the car using just the key (who still does that these days?!) the car fired up like a good un!! My neighbours face, who heard me turning it over for substantial periods, was a picture - you could hear his jaw drop. AA man was well pleased at an easy fix and time for a chat! Car's been ok since. Anyone any experience of this sort of thing? Also, how the hell does the emergency start procedure *work*? It says in my book turn the key to MAR, press accelerator fully then wait for the engine warning lamp to flash - er no it didn't. Fell at the first hurdle..any ideas..anyone?! -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject will be auto-deleted..sorry!) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:42:04 +0100, Zathras wrote: >> Car failed to start yesterday afternoon. First proper fail to proceed >> in 8 years. Not too shabby. >> >> However, I suspect the immobiliser is playing up. It cranked fine (for >> as long as I could be bothered holding the key!) and I could hear the >> fuel lift pump so I'm suspecting the immobiliser is playing up :-(( >> >> AA man arrived in good time and, after setting off the alarm by >> entering the car using just the key (who still does that these days?!) >> the car fired up like a good un!! My neighbours face, who heard me >> turning it over for substantial periods, was a picture - you could >> hear his jaw drop. AA man was well pleased at an easy fix and time for >> a chat! >> >> Car's been ok since. Anyone any experience of this sort of thing? > > My 02 156 could get into a state where the door locks and the > alarm were out of sync, so when the doors were locked the alarm > (and presumeably the immobiliser too) was off, when the doors were > unlocked the alarm was on. > > The way to fix it as I recall was to "lock" with the remove, so > the doors were unlocked, but the alarm was on, then "lock" with > the key, which locked the doors. Finally "unlock" with the remote, > which disabled the alarm and unlocked the doors. > >> Also, how the hell does the emergency start procedure *work*? It says >> in my book turn the key to MAR, press accelerator fully then wait for >> the engine warning lamp to flash - er no it didn't. Fell at the first >> hurdle..any ideas..anyone?! >> > > That sounds possible. Let's hope it's something as daft as that......instead of something more sinister. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:42:04 +0100, Zathras wrote: >> Car failed to start yesterday afternoon. First proper fail to proceed >> in 8 years. Not too shabby. >> >> However, I suspect the immobiliser is playing up. It cranked fine (for >> as long as I could be bothered holding the key!) and I could hear the >> fuel lift pump so I'm suspecting the immobiliser is playing up :-(( >> >> AA man arrived in good time and, after setting off the alarm by >> entering the car using just the key (who still does that these days?!) >> the car fired up like a good un!! My neighbours face, who heard me >> turning it over for substantial periods, was a picture - you could >> hear his jaw drop. AA man was well pleased at an easy fix and time for >> a chat! >> >> Car's been ok since. Anyone any experience of this sort of thing? > > My 02 156 could get into a state where the door locks and the > alarm were out of sync, so when the doors were locked the alarm > (and presumeably the immobiliser too) was off, when the doors were > unlocked the alarm was on. Mine does that pretty regularly. > > The way to fix it as I recall was to "lock" with the remove, so > the doors were unlocked, but the alarm was on, then "lock" with > the key, which locked the doors. Finally "unlock" with the remote, > which disabled the alarm and unlocked the doors. Correct. Took me bloody ages to work out what was happening. > -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Zathras wrote:
> Car failed to start yesterday afternoon. First proper fail to proceed > in 8 years. Not too shabby. > > However, I suspect the immobiliser is playing up. It cranked fine (for > as long as I could be bothered holding the key!) and I could hear the > fuel lift pump so I'm suspecting the immobiliser is playing up :-(( How does the immobiliser work? Sounds a bit daft to allow cranking and fuel injection. > > AA man arrived in good time and, after setting off the alarm by > entering the car using just the key (who still does that these days?!) > the car fired up like a good un!! My neighbours face, who heard me > turning it over for substantial periods, was a picture - you could > hear his jaw drop. AA man was well pleased at an easy fix and time for > a chat! > > Car's been ok since. Anyone any experience of this sort of thing? > > Also, how the hell does the emergency start procedure *work*? It says > in my book turn the key to MAR, press accelerator fully then wait for > the engine warning lamp to flash - er no it didn't. Fell at the first > hurdle..any ideas..anyone?! > None at all. -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
On Mon, 11 May 2009 16:57:39 +0100, Catman
> wrote: >How does the immobiliser work? Sounds a bit daft to allow cranking and >fuel injection. The lift pump is in the fuel tank and feeds the high pressure pump in the engine bay. There's a return feed to the fuel tank so the fuel that's not squirted through the injectors circulates back to the tank. Common rail diesel injection is, in many respects, very similar to petrol injection fuel systems except for the pressure involved. To stop firing up the engine all that's needed is to not trigger the electronically controlled fuel injectors. As a precaution, I decided to replace the 3V batteries in the remotes as they were original (8 years old). Bugger me..they measured a decent 3.2V. In my books, that puts the amazing remote battery life up there with the exhausts!! -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject will be auto-deleted..sorry!) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:33:08 +0100, Jim > wrote:
>That sounds possible. Let's hope it's something as daft as >that......instead of something more sinister. Indeed..but it didn't seem like it. I was inside moving about (looking at the miserable emergency start procedure) with the doors shut and the alarm never triggered even when I opened the doors to get out so the alarm and immobiliser might have been out of sync (good grief!) but the doors and alarm weren't. -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject will be auto-deleted..sorry!) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
The little bugger did it again..just when I needed it for a school and
Gym (no no..not for me) run. Had to quick march to school to get the little 'un - boy I'm not as fit as I was 30 years ago!!! Anyway, the engine was warm so I figured it would start (as the last time) after about half an hour so I didn't try and persuade it to go - just gave up and left it. Sure enough, just as before, it fired up after half an hour and got the little 'un to her Gym class which is several miles away. It's unheard of for me to stall the 2.4 manoeuvring on the flat in a car park but the motor just died. Oh no I thought - but it restarted just fine. Armed with all this info, Google is suggesting the crank/rpm sensor is quite a common failure on JTDs over 50,000 miles. I think I'll ask my independent to "just change it". I'll report back on progress.. -- Z Scotland Alfa Romeo 156 2.4JTD Veloce Leather 'Oil' be seeing you.. (Email without 'Alfa' in subject will be auto-deleted..sorry!) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Zathras wrote:
> The little bugger did it again..just when I needed it for a school and > Gym (no no..not for me) run. Had to quick march to school to get the > little 'un - boy I'm not as fit as I was 30 years ago!!! > > Anyway, the engine was warm so I figured it would start (as the last > time) after about half an hour so I didn't try and persuade it to go - > just gave up and left it. Sure enough, just as before, it fired up > after half an hour and got the little 'un to her Gym class which is > several miles away. It's unheard of for me to stall the 2.4 > manoeuvring on the flat in a car park but the motor just died. Oh no I > thought - but it restarted just fine. > > Armed with all this info, Google is suggesting the crank/rpm sensor is > quite a common failure on JTDs over 50,000 miles. I think I'll ask my > independent to "just change it". > > I'll report back on progress.. > Sounds likely to be some kind of sensor failing under heat. -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Catman wrote:
> Zathras wrote: >> The little bugger did it again..just when I needed it for a school and >> Gym (no no..not for me) run. Had to quick march to school to get the >> little 'un - boy I'm not as fit as I was 30 years ago!!! >> >> Anyway, the engine was warm so I figured it would start (as the last >> time) after about half an hour so I didn't try and persuade it to go - >> just gave up and left it. Sure enough, just as before, it fired up >> after half an hour and got the little 'un to her Gym class which is >> several miles away. It's unheard of for me to stall the 2.4 >> manoeuvring on the flat in a car park but the motor just died. Oh no I >> thought - but it restarted just fine. >> >> Armed with all this info, Google is suggesting the crank/rpm sensor is >> quite a common failure on JTDs over 50,000 miles. I think I'll ask my >> independent to "just change it". >> >> I'll report back on progress.. >> > > Sounds likely to be some kind of sensor failing under heat. > It's a bit worrying. The more 'complicated' these cars get the more we can expect this type of problem. Remember those far of days when yer motor stopped functioning? Is it fuel, is there a spark, etc.....before long you could be up and running again. Now you need a computer and a mind like Einstein (spelling?)! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I Don't Believe It!
Jim wrote:
> Catman wrote: >> Zathras wrote: >>> The little bugger did it again..just when I needed it for a school and >>> Gym (no no..not for me) run. Had to quick march to school to get the >>> little 'un - boy I'm not as fit as I was 30 years ago!!! >>> >>> Anyway, the engine was warm so I figured it would start (as the last >>> time) after about half an hour so I didn't try and persuade it to go - >>> just gave up and left it. Sure enough, just as before, it fired up >>> after half an hour and got the little 'un to her Gym class which is >>> several miles away. It's unheard of for me to stall the 2.4 >>> manoeuvring on the flat in a car park but the motor just died. Oh no I >>> thought - but it restarted just fine. >>> >>> Armed with all this info, Google is suggesting the crank/rpm sensor is >>> quite a common failure on JTDs over 50,000 miles. I think I'll ask my >>> independent to "just change it". >>> >>> I'll report back on progress.. >>> >> >> Sounds likely to be some kind of sensor failing under heat. >> > It's a bit worrying. The more 'complicated' these cars get the more we > can expect this type of problem. > > Remember those far of days when yer motor stopped functioning? Is it > fuel, is there a spark, etc.....before long you could be up and running > again. Now you need a computer and a mind like Einstein (spelling?)! SteveH carries his around FWIW even my bike needed it's brain lobotomised a while back. It just would not start. -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) 116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 145 2.0 Cloverleaf 156 V6 2.5 S2 Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see. www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|