helical spring washers

On 07/03/2013 09:52 AM, jim beam wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 05:44 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 08:27 PM, jim beam wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 01:39 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:33 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/2013 11:21 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 11:20 AM, jim beam wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat
>>>>>>>>> and Body Roll
>>>>>>>>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the
>>>>>>>>>>> application or
>>>>>>>>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of
>>>>>>>>>>> prevailing
>>>>>>>>>>> torque
>>>>>>>>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be
>>>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> how does marsden work?
>>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free
>>>>>>>>>> spinning nut
>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to
>>>>>>>>> find you a good
>>>>>>>>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is*
>>>>>>>>> free spinning
>>>>>>>>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to
>>>>>>>>> lock it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of
>>>>>>>>> it...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> staking tool my ass.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> now stop polluting the interwebs with your
>>>>>>>> misinformation. idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I've been given the wrong terminology, but on some
>>>>>>> older cars that I've worked on some of the suspension nuts
>>>>>>> look exactly like the one given in the patent you posted,
>>>>>>> however, on one flat of the nut there will be a small
>>>>>>> rectangular indentation and the nut is difficult to remove,
>>>>>>> requiring use of a wrench or ratchet the whole way off even
>>>>>>> if the threads are in excellent condition.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Every time I've asked an old school mechanic about this,
>>>>>>> they've said "oh, those are Marsden nuts, and they're staked
>>>>>>> after they've been properly torqued - that's what that
>>>>>>> indentation is" or something to that effect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've also been told that they were used in military
>>>>>>> applications.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've searched online to try to find a picture of this
>>>>>>> arrangement but I'm failing miserably. Wish I had an
>>>>>>> original car that used them so I could snap a pic so you
>>>>>>> could see what I'm talking about. Searching just yields a
>>>>>>> lot of references to AR-15s which apparently have a nut that
>>>>>>> uses similar terminology but don't look anything like what
>>>>>>> I'm talking about and the nut itself is not staked but the
>>>>>>> piece it threads against.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whenever coming across those I've always replaced them with
>>>>>>> ovalized nuts as that seems to be the modern equivalent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Something like these?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://catalog.alcoafasteners.com/vi...g-self-locking
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, they actually look exactly like the patent that jim beam posted,
>>>>> but
>>>>> staked. I'm trying to remember an exact application; I remember
>>>>> fighting with them but don't remember exactly where. Definitely on a
>>>>> Studebaker, but it wasn't the tie rod ends - those are castle nuts.
>>>>>
>>>>> nate
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it was the lower control arm nuts.
>>>>
>>>> ...but all my factory parts books are well packed away in a storage
>>>> locker at the moment...
>>>>
>>>> nate
>>>>
>>>
>>> so you just make stuff up instead - how convenient.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You're accusing me of lying about what I've personally seen and worked
>> on?
>>
>> nate
>>
>>
>
> no, i'm saying you're an idiot that doesn't know what they're looking
> at, can't be bothered to educate himself, and is retarded enough to
> propagate their knowledge vacuum by making **** up and spreading it all
> over the net. you're a ****ing cretin nate - a disgrace to the
> engineering community, your alma mater and the interwebs.
>
>
Ah, so you are doing in your post exactly what you accuse me of doing.
And have nothing constructive to say. As usual.

jim, why don't you post some content of your own for once and attempt to
spread knowledge rather than your constant habit of trying to mask your
obvious insecurities by constantly telling everyone else how much
smarter you are than they without any proof whatsoever?

nate

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

On 07/03/2013 08:01 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 09:52 AM, jim beam wrote:
>> On 07/03/2013 05:44 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 08:27 PM, jim beam wrote:
>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:39 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:33 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/2/2013 11:21 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 11:20 AM, jim beam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat
>>>>>>>>>> and Body Roll
>>>>>>>>>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> application or
>>>>>>>>>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>> prevailing
>>>>>>>>>>>> torque
>>>>>>>>>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be
>>>>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> how does marsden work?
>>>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free
>>>>>>>>>>> spinning nut
>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to
>>>>>>>>>> find you a good
>>>>>>>>>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is*
>>>>>>>>>> free spinning
>>>>>>>>>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to
>>>>>>>>>> lock it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of
>>>>>>>>>> it...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> staking tool my ass.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> now stop polluting the interwebs with your
>>>>>>>>> misinformation. idiot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe I've been given the wrong terminology, but on some
>>>>>>>> older cars that I've worked on some of the suspension nuts
>>>>>>>> look exactly like the one given in the patent you posted,
>>>>>>>> however, on one flat of the nut there will be a small
>>>>>>>> rectangular indentation and the nut is difficult to remove,
>>>>>>>> requiring use of a wrench or ratchet the whole way off even
>>>>>>>> if the threads are in excellent condition.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Every time I've asked an old school mechanic about this,
>>>>>>>> they've said "oh, those are Marsden nuts, and they're staked
>>>>>>>> after they've been properly torqued - that's what that
>>>>>>>> indentation is" or something to that effect.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've also been told that they were used in military
>>>>>>>> applications.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've searched online to try to find a picture of this
>>>>>>>> arrangement but I'm failing miserably. Wish I had an
>>>>>>>> original car that used them so I could snap a pic so you
>>>>>>>> could see what I'm talking about. Searching just yields a
>>>>>>>> lot of references to AR-15s which apparently have a nut that
>>>>>>>> uses similar terminology but don't look anything like what
>>>>>>>> I'm talking about and the nut itself is not staked but the
>>>>>>>> piece it threads against.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whenever coming across those I've always replaced them with
>>>>>>>> ovalized nuts as that seems to be the modern equivalent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something like these?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://catalog.alcoafasteners.com/vi...g-self-locking
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, they actually look exactly like the patent that jim beam posted,
>>>>>> but
>>>>>> staked. I'm trying to remember an exact application; I remember
>>>>>> fighting with them but don't remember exactly where. Definitely on a
>>>>>> Studebaker, but it wasn't the tie rod ends - those are castle nuts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it was the lower control arm nuts.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...but all my factory parts books are well packed away in a storage
>>>>> locker at the moment...
>>>>>
>>>>> nate
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so you just make stuff up instead - how convenient.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You're accusing me of lying about what I've personally seen and worked
>>> on?
>>>
>>> nate
>>>
>>>
>>
>> no, i'm saying you're an idiot that doesn't know what they're looking
>> at, can't be bothered to educate himself, and is retarded enough to
>> propagate their knowledge vacuum by making **** up and spreading it all
>> over the net. you're a ****ing cretin nate - a disgrace to the
>> engineering community, your alma mater and the interwebs.
>>
>>
> Ah, so you are doing in your post exactly what you accuse me of doing.
> And have nothing constructive to say. As usual.
>
> jim, why don't you post some content of your own for once and attempt to
> spread knowledge rather than your constant habit of trying to mask your
> obvious insecurities by constantly telling everyone else how much
> smarter you are than they without any proof whatsoever?

are you for ****ing real??? i post the only ****ing link that answers
your inane blathering [as usual], something on which you've spent years
in ignorance, and yet i'm the one with "nothing constructive to say"???

you really are quite astoundingly incredibly unashamedly stooooopid.


--
fact check required

On 07/03/2013 11:10 AM, jim beam wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 08:01 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>> On 07/03/2013 09:52 AM, jim beam wrote:
>>> On 07/03/2013 05:44 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>> On 07/02/2013 08:27 PM, jim beam wrote:
>>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:39 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:33 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/2/2013 11:21 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 11:20 AM, jim beam wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat
>>>>>>>>>>> and Body Roll
>>>>>>>>>>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> application or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevailing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> torque
>>>>>>>>>>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> used.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> how does marsden work?
>>>>>>>>>>>> (
>>>>>>>>>>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free
>>>>>>>>>>>> spinning nut
>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to
>>>>>>>>>>> find you a good
>>>>>>>>>>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is*
>>>>>>>>>>> free spinning
>>>>>>>>>>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to
>>>>>>>>>>> lock it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of
>>>>>>>>>>> it...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> staking tool my ass.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> now stop polluting the interwebs with your
>>>>>>>>>> misinformation. idiot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe I've been given the wrong terminology, but on some
>>>>>>>>> older cars that I've worked on some of the suspension nuts
>>>>>>>>> look exactly like the one given in the patent you posted,
>>>>>>>>> however, on one flat of the nut there will be a small
>>>>>>>>> rectangular indentation and the nut is difficult to remove,
>>>>>>>>> requiring use of a wrench or ratchet the whole way off even
>>>>>>>>> if the threads are in excellent condition.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Every time I've asked an old school mechanic about this,
>>>>>>>>> they've said "oh, those are Marsden nuts, and they're staked
>>>>>>>>> after they've been properly torqued - that's what that
>>>>>>>>> indentation is" or something to that effect.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've also been told that they were used in military
>>>>>>>>> applications.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've searched online to try to find a picture of this
>>>>>>>>> arrangement but I'm failing miserably. Wish I had an
>>>>>>>>> original car that used them so I could snap a pic so you
>>>>>>>>> could see what I'm talking about. Searching just yields a
>>>>>>>>> lot of references to AR-15s which apparently have a nut that
>>>>>>>>> uses similar terminology but don't look anything like what
>>>>>>>>> I'm talking about and the nut itself is not staked but the
>>>>>>>>> piece it threads against.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whenever coming across those I've always replaced them with
>>>>>>>>> ovalized nuts as that seems to be the modern equivalent.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something like these?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://catalog.alcoafasteners.com/vi...g-self-locking
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, they actually look exactly like the patent that jim beam posted,
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> staked. I'm trying to remember an exact application; I remember
>>>>>>> fighting with them but don't remember exactly where. Definitely
>>>>>>> on a
>>>>>>> Studebaker, but it wasn't the tie rod ends - those are castle nuts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it was the lower control arm nuts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...but all my factory parts books are well packed away in a storage
>>>>>> locker at the moment...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nate
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so you just make stuff up instead - how convenient.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're accusing me of lying about what I've personally seen and worked
>>>> on?
>>>>
>>>> nate
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> no, i'm saying you're an idiot that doesn't know what they're looking
>>> at, can't be bothered to educate himself, and is retarded enough to
>>> propagate their knowledge vacuum by making **** up and spreading it all
>>> over the net. you're a ****ing cretin nate - a disgrace to the
>>> engineering community, your alma mater and the interwebs.
>>>
>>>
>> Ah, so you are doing in your post exactly what you accuse me of doing.
>> And have nothing constructive to say. As usual.
>>
>> jim, why don't you post some content of your own for once and attempt to
>> spread knowledge rather than your constant habit of trying to mask your
>> obvious insecurities by constantly telling everyone else how much
>> smarter you are than they without any proof whatsoever?
>
> are you for ****ing real??? i post the only ****ing link that answers
> your inane blathering [as usual], something on which you've spent years
> in ignorance, and yet i'm the one with "nothing constructive to say"???
>
> you really are quite astoundingly incredibly unashamedly stooooopid.
>
>

Yet another post with no substance. Look in the mirror, retard. You're
such an asshole your own dog thinks you're a dick.

--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

On Wednesday, July 3, 2013 12:54:09 PM UTC-5, Nate Nagel wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 11:10 AM, jim beam wrote:
>
> > On 07/03/2013 08:01 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >> On 07/03/2013 09:52 AM, jim beam wrote:
>
> >>> On 07/03/2013 05:44 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >>>> On 07/02/2013 08:27 PM, jim beam wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:39 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:33 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 01:13 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On 7/2/2013 11:21 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 11:20 AM, jim beam wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and Body Roll
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> application or
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> prevailing
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> torque
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> used.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> how does marsden work?
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> spinning nut
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> )
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> find you a good
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is*
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> free spinning
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> lock it.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> it...
>
> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>> staking tool my ass.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>
> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>> now stop polluting the interwebs with your
>
> >>>>>>>>>> misinformation. idiot.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe I've been given the wrong terminology, but on some
>
> >>>>>>>>> older cars that I've worked on some of the suspension nuts
>
> >>>>>>>>> look exactly like the one given in the patent you posted,
>
> >>>>>>>>> however, on one flat of the nut there will be a small
>
> >>>>>>>>> rectangular indentation and the nut is difficult to remove,
>
> >>>>>>>>> requiring use of a wrench or ratchet the whole way off even
>
> >>>>>>>>> if the threads are in excellent condition.
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> Every time I've asked an old school mechanic about this,
>
> >>>>>>>>> they've said "oh, those are Marsden nuts, and they're staked
>
> >>>>>>>>> after they've been properly torqued - that's what that
>
> >>>>>>>>> indentation is" or something to that effect.
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> I've also been told that they were used in military
>
> >>>>>>>>> applications.
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> I've searched online to try to find a picture of this
>
> >>>>>>>>> arrangement but I'm failing miserably. Wish I had an
>
> >>>>>>>>> original car that used them so I could snap a pic so you
>
> >>>>>>>>> could see what I'm talking about. Searching just yields a
>
> >>>>>>>>> lot of references to AR-15s which apparently have a nut that
>
> >>>>>>>>> uses similar terminology but don't look anything like what
>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm talking about and the nut itself is not staked but the
>
> >>>>>>>>> piece it threads against.
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> Whenever coming across those I've always replaced them with
>
> >>>>>>>>> ovalized nuts as that seems to be the modern equivalent.
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>> nate
>
> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>> Something like these?
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>> http://catalog.alcoafasteners.com/vi...g-self-locking
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>> No, they actually look exactly like the patent that jim beam posted,
>
> >>>>>>> but
>
> >>>>>>> staked. I'm trying to remember an exact application; I remember
>
> >>>>>>> fighting with them but don't remember exactly where. Definitely
>
> >>>>>>> on a
>
> >>>>>>> Studebaker, but it wasn't the tie rod ends - those are castle nuts.
>
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>> nate
>
> >>>>>>>
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>> Maybe it was the lower control arm nuts.
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>> ...but all my factory parts books are well packed away in a storage
>
> >>>>>> locker at the moment...
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>> nate
>
> >>>>>>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>> so you just make stuff up instead - how convenient.
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> You're accusing me of lying about what I've personally seen and worked
>
> >>>> on?
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> nate
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>
>
> >>> no, i'm saying you're an idiot that doesn't know what they're looking
>
> >>> at, can't be bothered to educate himself, and is retarded enough to
>
> >>> propagate their knowledge vacuum by making **** up and spreading it all
>
> >>> over the net. you're a ****ing cretin nate - a disgrace to the
>
> >>> engineering community, your alma mater and the interwebs.
>
> >>>
>
> >>>
>
> >> Ah, so you are doing in your post exactly what you accuse me of doing.
>
> >> And have nothing constructive to say. As usual.
>
> >>
>
> >> jim, why don't you post some content of your own for once and attempt to
>
> >> spread knowledge rather than your constant habit of trying to mask your
>
> >> obvious insecurities by constantly telling everyone else how much
>
> >> smarter you are than they without any proof whatsoever?
>
> >
>
> > are you for ****ing real??? i post the only ****ing link that answers
>
> > your inane blathering [as usual], something on which you've spent years
>
> > in ignorance, and yet i'm the one with "nothing constructive to say"???
>
> >
>
> > you really are quite astoundingly incredibly unashamedly stooooopid.
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
> Yet another post with no substance. Look in the mirror, retard. You're
>
> such an asshole your own dog thinks you're a dick.
>
>
>
> --
>
> replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
>
> http://members.cox.net/njnagel

If you want to do a Google for, stake nuts auto

Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat and Body Roll Bros Suspension Works wrote:
> according to this:
> http://www.boltscience.com/pages/hel...ingwashers.htm
>
> they are not effective (making the matter worse actually)
>
> and yet I think I saw them in some application lately.
> Why are they still made?

so people can make silly videos and call it science
G

On 7/2/13 6:20 PM, jim beam wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat and Body Roll
>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the application or
>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of prevailing
>>>> torque
>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be used.
>>>>
>>> how does marsden work?
>>> (
>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free spinning nut
>>> )
>>
>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to find you a good
>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is* free spinning
>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to lock it.
>>
>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of it...
>
> staking tool my ass.
>
> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>
a self distorting nut to bed better

what a clever ******* that Mardsen was

less-is-more to quote the makers of the perfectly cromulent phrases

On 07/04/2013 12:35 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat and Body Roll
Bros Suspension Works wrote:
> On 7/2/13 6:20 PM, jim beam wrote:
>> On 07/02/2013 05:36 AM, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>> On 07/02/2013 04:06 AM, Brake Dive, Acceleration Squat and Body Roll
>>> Bros Suspension Works wrote:
>>>>> the fastener selected was the incorrect one for the application or
>>>>> something like a thread locking compound, some kind of prevailing
>>>>> torque
>>>>> locking nut, or something like a Marsden nut should be used.
>>>>>
>>>> how does marsden work?
>>>> (
>>>> from some of the pictures googled it looks like a free spinning nut
>>>> )
>>>
>>> It's a very old school arrangement, and I was trying to find you a good
>>> explanation online and failing... but basically it *is* free spinning
>>> when installed, then it's staked with a special tool to lock it.
>>>
>>> I never had the special tool, nor can I find a picture of it...
>>
>> staking tool my ass.
>>
>> www.google.com/patents/US1734445
>>
> a self distorting nut to bed better
>
> what a clever ******* that Mardsen was

indeed - genius in [*elastic* distortion] simplicity.


>
> less-is-more to quote the makers of the perfectly cromulent phrases
>


--
fact check required