Newbie

Davoud wrote:
> Davoud:
>>> Ignoring a traffic ticket isn't a sin,
>>> even in the so-called Holy Land; just a misdemeanor for non-diplomats
>>> and SOP for diplomats.
>
> Squat:
>> Hmm, Let me think..
>
> You have invoked "Godwin's Law" over a traffic citation! If you think
> that ignoring a traffic citation is the moral equivalent of the murder
> of six million innocents and the enslavement of human beings, you need
> to do some _very_ _deep_ re-thinking, because you are profoundly
> confused on moral issues.
>
>> Executing Jews was the SOP for the Nazi party back in the 1940's. So that
>> was ok?
>> Slavery was acceptable in the 1800s, Does that make it right?
>>
>> Defending deplorable behavior with the argument that "Everybody does it" is
>> not going to win any debates in the near future.
>
> This is not a debate. I ignored a traffic citation. I am unapologetic
> over this "deplorable" action. So turn me in, try to get me extradited,
> kill-file me, or, perhaps, just get over it.
>
> Davoud

From 08-01-2009:

"Let the next round of flames begin. I'm killing this thread--I'm away
on a trip in the great American midwest and I don't have time for
trolling remarks such as those below!

Davoud"

Way to kill a thread Davoud.

Your post proves that you are just plain full of ****, because
responding to a post that you have killed is impossible.

I knew you were still reading the responses. As a troll, yes, a true
troll, you would have been incapable of doing anything else.

So, now the killing of a thread means to continue reading it? I don't
think that is the way it works.

For someone who is so concerned about proper English, the correct
sentence would have been, "I am going to continue reading this thread
and I will post at least one more response to it".

This guy has easily won my usenet idiot of the year award, at least for
this newsgroup.
We have over 1/4 of the year to go, but nobody will beat this guy for
the top spot.

Have a nice day Davoud....... :-)

Pat