If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Linda wrote: > > <snip> > > Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". > Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. > > TIA |
Ads |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Linda wrote: > > <snip> > > Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". > Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. > > TIA |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Linda wrote: > > <snip> > > Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". > Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. > > TIA Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice pun. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Linda wrote: > > <snip> > > Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". > Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. > > TIA Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice pun. Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my adddress with the letter 'x') ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > > wrote: > > >>Big Bill wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke was gay, >>>>>>I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. They were Men's >>>>>>Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think otherwise. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. That's not >>>>>anywhere near what was written. >>>>>What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to support >>>>>your claim. >>>>> >>>> >>>>and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I cannot >>>>find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>> >>> >>>Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>generate requests for some evidence??? >>> >> >>Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and again >>as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a claim that >>our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... > > > Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? > Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, so > I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about it." > This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. > Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you > say. Especially when you malign an ICON. > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you for thinking both.... Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read your original posts.... |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > > wrote: > > >>Big Bill wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke was gay, >>>>>>I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. They were Men's >>>>>>Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think otherwise. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. That's not >>>>>anywhere near what was written. >>>>>What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to support >>>>>your claim. >>>>> >>>> >>>>and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I cannot >>>>find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>> >>> >>>Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>generate requests for some evidence??? >>> >> >>Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and again >>as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a claim that >>our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... > > > Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? > Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, so > I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about it." > This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. > Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you > say. Especially when you malign an ICON. > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you for thinking both.... Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read your original posts.... |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Bigelow wrote:
> "Big Bill" > wrote in message > news > >>>Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and again >>>as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a claim that >>>our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >>Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, so >>I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about it." >>This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >>Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>say. Especially when you malign an ICON. > > > Malign? > How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? > also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay and an ICON? |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Bigelow wrote:
> "Big Bill" > wrote in message > news > >>>Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and again >>>as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a claim that >>>our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >>Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, so >>I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about it." >>This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >>Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>say. Especially when you malign an ICON. > > > Malign? > How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? > also, i would like to interject: is it against the *rules* to be Gay and an ICON? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | Chief_Wiggum | Honda | 16 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Honda | 3 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik | Honda | 1 | November 7th 04 05:48 PM |