If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that
the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? California car. mike |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
goodnigh wrote:
> > My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that > the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. > I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers > that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. > "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement > standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? > California car. > > mike Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've never stopped me on it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
"goodnigh" > wrote in message link.net... > My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that > the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. > I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers > that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. > "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement > standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? > California car. Shoulder belts became a federal mandate in '68. Scott W. '68 Ranchero '69 Mustang TS #57 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
"vince garcia" > wrote in message ... > goodnigh wrote: >> >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? >> California car. >> >> mike > > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've > never stopped me on it. Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? mike |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
goodnigh wrote:
> > "vince garcia" > wrote in message > ... > > goodnigh wrote: > >> > >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that > >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. > >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers > >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. > >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement > >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? > >> California car. > >> > >> mike > > > > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've > > never stopped me on it. > > Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable > to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? > > mike I've never cared to look for one, so I cannot say. As noted, I wear the lap belt and the cops have never stopped me, so I would use the lap belt and just play ignorant. I don't think you'll get in trouble if they stop you and see you're actually wearing the safer lap belt in that old a rig |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
"vince garcia" > wrote in message ... > goodnigh wrote: >> >> "vince garcia" > wrote in message >> ... >> > goodnigh wrote: >> >> >> >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that >> >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. >> >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers >> >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. >> >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement >> >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? >> >> California car. >> >> >> >> mike >> > >> > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've >> > never stopped me on it. >> >> Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable >> to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? >> >> mike > > I've never cared to look for one, so I cannot say. As noted, I wear the > lap belt and the cops have never stopped me, so I would use the lap belt > and just play ignorant. I don't think you'll get in trouble if they stop > you and see you're actually wearing the safer lap belt in that old a rig Could just remove it like it was never there. Then again, if the cop doesn't know what to do, they will write a ticket and let the judge figure it out. Probably safer to wear the whole rig. Just wish I could find something more comfortable. mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:56:49 GMT, "goodnigh"
> wrote: > >"vince garcia" > wrote in message ... >> goodnigh wrote: >>> >>> "vince garcia" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > goodnigh wrote: >>> >> >>> >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that >>> >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. >>> >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers >>> >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. >>> >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement >>> >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? >>> >> California car. >>> >> >>> >> mike >>> > >>> > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've >>> > never stopped me on it. >>> >>> Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable >>> to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? >>> Depending on what you consider uncomfortable, you could replace it with a later model, which may require some modifications to the vehicle mounting points, possibly replace it with an aftermarket 3 point system (what I have for my 65 FB), or get one of those sheepskin pads. As for the cops.... since your car was produced after the mandatory law went into effect AND the shoulder belt is there, failure to wear it would technically be a violation. Still, enforcement can vary from one cop to the next. One thing is to not be obvious about not wearing the shoulder belt. I was generally too busy to be watching for seatbelt violations, HOWEVER, nothing invites me to pull them over like a seatbelt hanging out of the car, or a shoulder belt flapping in the wind. Tighten that shoulder belt down so it doesn't flop around, but don't do anything permanent which would show an intent to avoid compliance. Rubberband(s) as opposed to screw(s). Personally, I hated the shoulder belts, but, for safety, I wore them until they became an unconscious habit. Another point you might consider. The way insurance companies are (and they are getting worse) you might find they refuse to pay if it can be shown that you didn't wear the complete system. Essentially, you would have failed to mitigate damages by non-compliance. Or they may pay and cancel you. -- Spike 1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok; Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound audio-video... See my ride at.... Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/d..._11_05_002.jpg Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/E...ebuild_006.jpg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
"vince garcia" > wrote in message ... > goodnigh wrote: >> >> "vince garcia" > wrote in message >> ... >> > goodnigh wrote: >> >> >> >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that >> >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. >> >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers >> >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. >> >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement >> >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? >> >> California car. >> >> >> >> mike >> > >> > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've >> > never stopped me on it. >> >> Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable >> to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? >> >> mike > > I've never cared to look for one, so I cannot say. As noted, I wear the > lap belt and the cops have never stopped me, so I would use the lap belt > and just play ignorant. I don't think you'll get in trouble if they stop > you and see you're actually wearing the safer lap belt in that old a rig There are some clips that you can get that adjust the point where the harness crosses over your shoulder. It may be a thought, ot maybe a pad to go over your shoulder. I always get rubbed across my neck, well, did until the rig I drive now. You must surely know, that the officers have seen more than one person playing ignorant. Trust me, they won't buy it. Cops have heard it all, seen it all and more than once too. You may think you have an original excuse, but tons of other people have come up with the same thing. Best bet, ask someone in law enforcement ping SPIKE in the group, he may know for sure. It may be something that each individual officer would make a judgement call on too. One may be ok, the next may be ****ed off cause his boss/wife/girlfriend was on his ass earlier in the day and he may decide that he is tired of putting up with lies and excuses. I suggest you continue to wear both belts, for your own safety AND insist that your hammerheaded passengers do the same. When they start making stupid excuses, remind them that (last time I was there) improper use or lack of a seatbelt was a $250 fine, see if it means that much to them. If so, then tell em to cough it up before you start the engine. Kate |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Question: CA seatbelt law
On Sun, 1 Oct 2006 12:04:08 -0500, "Kate"
> wrote: > >"vince garcia" > wrote in message ... >> goodnigh wrote: >>> >>> "vince garcia" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> > goodnigh wrote: >>> >> >>> >> My '71 Grande has a seat belt plus shoulder harness that >>> >> the driver needs to attach to the seat belt in a second action. >>> >> I always wear both belts but have been challenged by passengers >>> >> that the shoulder harness is "optional" according to the law. >>> >> "optional" equals "stupid" in my mind, but from a law enforcement >>> >> standpoint; is the shoulder harness "optional"? >>> >> California car. >>> >> >>> >> mike >>> > >>> > Technically, the law is you must use the shoulder belt, but they've >>> > never stopped me on it. >>> >>> Is there any way to make the shoulder harness more comfortable >>> to wear? Do they make replacement belts/harnesses for this model? >>> >>> mike >> >> I've never cared to look for one, so I cannot say. As noted, I wear the >> lap belt and the cops have never stopped me, so I would use the lap belt >> and just play ignorant. I don't think you'll get in trouble if they stop >> you and see you're actually wearing the safer lap belt in that old a rig > >There are some clips that you can get that adjust the point where the >harness crosses over your shoulder. It may be a thought, ot maybe a pad to >go over your shoulder. > >I always get rubbed across my neck, well, did until the rig I drive now. > >You must surely know, that the officers have seen more than one person >playing ignorant. >Trust me, they won't buy it. Cops have heard it all, seen it all and more >than once too. >You may think you have an original excuse, but tons of other people have >come up with the same thing. > >Best bet, ask someone in law enforcement ping SPIKE in the group, he may >know for sure. >It may be something that each individual officer would make a judgement call >on too. One may be ok, the next may be ****ed off cause his >boss/wife/girlfriend was on his ass earlier in the day and he may decide >that he is tired of putting up with lies and excuses. > >I suggest you continue to wear both belts, for your own safety AND insist >that your hammerheaded passengers do the same. >When they start making stupid excuses, remind them that (last time I was >there) improper use or lack of a seatbelt was a $250 fine, see if it means >that much to them. If so, then tell em to cough it up before you start the >engine. > >Kate > > On target and well said!!!!! :0) -- Spike 1965 Ford Mustang Fastback 2+2, Vintage Burgundy w/Black Std Interior, A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok; Vintage 40 16" rims w/225/50ZR16 KDWS BF Goodrich gForce Radial T/As, Cobra drop; surround sound audio-video... See my ride at.... Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/003_May_21_3004.jpg Feb 2004- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/005_May_21_2004.jpg Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/d..._11_05_002.jpg Jul 2005- http://207.36.208.198/albums/86810/E...ebuild_006.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Physics Question | Alan Baker | Driving | 1 | September 9th 06 05:49 AM |
Toyota Seatbelt Question | M.M. | Technology | 0 | July 30th 06 06:59 PM |
2005 Mustang Fog Light Question | Craig Shaffer | Ford Mustang | 2 | June 23rd 06 06:24 PM |
1993 Saturn Fuel Filter Question OHC (SOHC)? | [email protected] | Saturn | 7 | May 21st 06 08:39 PM |
Where to get Official Speed Limit Info | [email protected] | Driving | 40 | January 3rd 05 07:10 AM |