If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Off Road vehicle decisions, help!
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to this newsgroup. Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land Rover Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of nothing but sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people (including the driver) into the vehicle and went through all kinds of difficult terrain with no problems. I was sold on the vehicle! But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair since it's a foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying a used Land Rover since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader? In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on the coastline, but the majority is brush land. Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My main priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
> What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader?
> In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My > main priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space For low cost, available parts and easy repair and buildups you can't beat a Chevy pickup. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
> What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader?
> In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My > main priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space For low cost, available parts and easy repair and buildups you can't beat a Chevy pickup. Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Jeep Grand Cherokee.. for larger than stock tires, there is a budget lift
kit available for maybe US$300 if required.. -- History is only the past if we choose to do nothing about it.. "TooPlaneCrazy7" > wrote in message ... > Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land Rover > Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of nothing but > sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people (including the driver) into > the vehicle and went through all kinds of difficult terrain with no problems. I > was sold on the vehicle! > > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair since it's a > foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying a used Land Rover > since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader? In > South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My main > priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space > > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. > > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Jeep Grand Cherokee.. for larger than stock tires, there is a budget lift
kit available for maybe US$300 if required.. -- History is only the past if we choose to do nothing about it.. "TooPlaneCrazy7" > wrote in message ... > Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land Rover > Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of nothing but > sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people (including the driver) into > the vehicle and went through all kinds of difficult terrain with no problems. I > was sold on the vehicle! > > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair since it's a > foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying a used Land Rover > since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader? In > South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My main > priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space > > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. > > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Roughly 12/19/03 08:01, TooPlaneCrazy7's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land Rover > Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of nothing but > sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people (including the driver) into > the vehicle and went through all kinds of difficult terrain with no problems. I > was sold on the vehicle! > > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair since it's a > foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying a used Land Rover > since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader? In > South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My main > priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space The Land Rover is now a Ford, with some innards still from BMW such as the engine. It is a very expensive luxo SUV. For a tad less money with more luxury and far better on-road matters, look at the VW Touareg. For a tad more money and the best on-road manners of any SUV [say, you want to do 160 mph on the way to the beach] check out the Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Both the VW and the Porsche are available with full locking transfer case and differentials, plus air control suspension that hunkers down on the highway so you can't tip it over yet can be raised for off road clearance. > > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. Check out the Nissan Titan plus the Chevy and Dodge models as well. > > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? Not necessarily, but it helps keep it on *top* of the sand. When you say bed space, do you want an uncovered bed, or is the ability to drop the 2nd and 3rd row seats down good enough? Or even the ability to normally run with the vehicle entirely closed, but be able to open the rear hatch such that there is a direct shot straight up? A pickup with crew cab will be a bit more claustrophobic than something like the Ford Explorer pickuplet. Congratulations, you are now at the fun stages of 4x4'ing, the horizons are wide open. -- Fan of the dumbest team in America. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Roughly 12/19/03 08:01, TooPlaneCrazy7's monkeys randomly typed:
> Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land Rover > Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of nothing but > sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people (including the driver) into > the vehicle and went through all kinds of difficult terrain with no problems. I > was sold on the vehicle! > > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair since it's a > foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying a used Land Rover > since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL offroader? In > South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. We have sand dunes on > the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than price). My main > priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 > doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space The Land Rover is now a Ford, with some innards still from BMW such as the engine. It is a very expensive luxo SUV. For a tad less money with more luxury and far better on-road matters, look at the VW Touareg. For a tad more money and the best on-road manners of any SUV [say, you want to do 160 mph on the way to the beach] check out the Porsche Cayenne Turbo. Both the VW and the Porsche are available with full locking transfer case and differentials, plus air control suspension that hunkers down on the highway so you can't tip it over yet can be raised for off road clearance. > > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. Check out the Nissan Titan plus the Chevy and Dodge models as well. > > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? Not necessarily, but it helps keep it on *top* of the sand. When you say bed space, do you want an uncovered bed, or is the ability to drop the 2nd and 3rd row seats down good enough? Or even the ability to normally run with the vehicle entirely closed, but be able to open the rear hatch such that there is a direct shot straight up? A pickup with crew cab will be a bit more claustrophobic than something like the Ford Explorer pickuplet. Congratulations, you are now at the fun stages of 4x4'ing, the horizons are wide open. -- Fan of the dumbest team in America. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TooPlaneCrazy7 wrote:
> Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land > Rover Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of > nothing but sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people > (including the driver) into the vehicle and went through all kinds of > difficult terrain with no problems. I was sold on the vehicle! > Sounds like fun - Discoverys are probably the most off-road capable 7 seat SUV in unmodified form that are available relatively cheaply second hand. > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair > since it's a foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying > a used Land Rover since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > Discoverys aren't foreign - they're English! They are very cheap to repair here in England but I expect your local Chevy and Ford pickups are cheaper over there. As for buying one secondhand - you *will* know whether it leaks oil or not, just look underneath. My 1997 V8 has no leaks. Contrary to what other people who don't know what they are talking about will tell you, there are no BMW bits in Discoverys - the engine is a Rover V8 that was originally a Buick unit and the autoboxes are ZF units. > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL > offroader? In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. > We have sand dunes on the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > Ask yourself the following question - what other vehicle can I get that has solid axles front and rear (v. good off-road) coil springs and disc brakes all round and permanent 4WD for a low budget? If any other vehicles appeal, try them in the conditions the Discovery impressed you and see if they are as good. > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than > price). My main priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: > 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space > There are many reasons not to go with the LR - the only one that matters is if you want one! > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. > Drive one off-road before you buy - they don't ride like a Discovery off-road and tend to have rather, errrr, old fashioned underpinnings such as cart springs. > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? Generally you are right, but it depends on the conditions. In dry scrub and sand as you describe, it doesn't have a big influence as long as you have the right tyres. If you need any further convincing have a look at: http://www.discoweb.org/ And ask some questions on the bulletin board. -- Julian --------- = Pretentious Sig required = |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TooPlaneCrazy7 wrote:
> Hello everyone, > This is my first post to this newsgroup. > > Last week I had the fantastic opportunity to go offroading in a Land > Rover Discovery on the beaches of Padre Island...a 30 mile stretch of > nothing but sand dunes, mud, and tall grass. We packed 7 people > (including the driver) into the vehicle and went through all kinds of > difficult terrain with no problems. I was sold on the vehicle! > Sounds like fun - Discoverys are probably the most off-road capable 7 seat SUV in unmodified form that are available relatively cheaply second hand. > But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair > since it's a foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying > a used Land Rover since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. > Discoverys aren't foreign - they're English! They are very cheap to repair here in England but I expect your local Chevy and Ford pickups are cheaper over there. As for buying one secondhand - you *will* know whether it leaks oil or not, just look underneath. My 1997 V8 has no leaks. Contrary to what other people who don't know what they are talking about will tell you, there are no BMW bits in Discoverys - the engine is a Rover V8 that was originally a Buick unit and the autoboxes are ZF units. > What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL > offroader? In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. > We have sand dunes on the coastline, but the majority is brush land. > Ask yourself the following question - what other vehicle can I get that has solid axles front and rear (v. good off-road) coil springs and disc brakes all round and permanent 4WD for a low budget? If any other vehicles appeal, try them in the conditions the Discovery impressed you and see if they are as good. > Give me a reason why not to go with the Land Rover (other than > price). My main priorities in an offroad vehicle is the following: > 1.) 4x4 2.) cab space (4 doors, but 2 is fine) 3.) bed space > There are many reasons not to go with the LR - the only one that matters is if you want one! > I am leaning towards a pickup. Toyota vs. Ford. > Drive one off-road before you buy - they don't ride like a Discovery off-road and tend to have rather, errrr, old fashioned underpinnings such as cart springs. > Also, the lighter the vehicle, the better offroader, right? Generally you are right, but it depends on the conditions. In dry scrub and sand as you describe, it doesn't have a big influence as long as you have the right tyres. If you need any further convincing have a look at: http://www.discoweb.org/ And ask some questions on the bulletin board. -- Julian --------- = Pretentious Sig required = |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Roughly 12/19/03 10:53, Exit's monkeys randomly typed:
>> But, I've heard that Land Rovers are expensive vehicles to repair >> since it's a foreign car and that one should NOT even consider buying >> a used Land Rover since you don't know whether it leaks oil, etc. >> > Discoverys aren't foreign - they're English! They are very cheap to repair > here in England but I expect your local Chevy and Ford pickups are cheaper > over there. As for buying one secondhand - you *will* know whether it leaks > oil or not, just look underneath. My 1997 V8 has no leaks. Contrary to what > other people who don't know what they are talking about will tell you, there > are no BMW bits in Discoverys - the engine is a Rover V8 that was originally > a Buick unit and the autoboxes are ZF units. Discoverys are now Fords, but with their own engineering etc. A similar vehicle is the Nissan Xterra, but I dunno if it still has solid axles or not all around. Note that you really only need solid axles if you plan on rock crawling. The Toyota RAV4 is another vehicle in the class, but tends to be rather pricey as a used vehicle. Also the Ford Escape and the Jeep Liberty as new. > >> What other 4x4 vehicles do you guys recommend for the CASUAL >> offroader? In South Texas, where I live, the land is relatively flat. >> We have sand dunes on the coastline, but the majority is brush land. >> > Ask yourself the following question - what other vehicle can I get that has > solid axles front and rear (v. good off-road) coil springs and disc brakes > all round and permanent 4WD for a low budget? If any other vehicles appeal, > try them in the conditions the Discovery impressed you and see if they are > as good. The Jeep Cherokee and Grand Cherokee both have the solid axles, the Grand Cherokee has coil springs and disk brakes and permanent 4wd all around. Both fairly lightweight compared to other SUV's. -- Fan of the dumbest team in America. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New *FREE* Corvette Discussion Forum | JLA ENTERPRISES TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATION | Corvette | 12 | November 30th 04 06:36 PM |
Audi All Road reliability | LIW | Audi | 2 | November 3rd 04 08:39 PM |
Decisions, decisions... | Dr Entropy | Alfa Romeo | 3 | October 20th 04 08:17 PM |
Vehicle Speed Sensor Circuit problem code | jameson | Corvette | 10 | October 15th 04 09:10 PM |