If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
$ per mile: high compression/high test vs. low compression/regular
On Monday, 28 January 2013 07:27:03 UTC+8, Existential Angst wrote:
> > > > Heh, and a litttle known fact-let: > > The actual heat content of regular gas is higher than that of high test!! > I once found a document on BP website about their motor fuels. It stated that the the 91, 95 and 98 RON all had the same energy content per litre, but the 100 RON had significantly more energy content. |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Repost for new members: 1924 Chrysler B-70 'High Compression' Six Cylinder Engine Right svl (WPC Museum) F.jpg 231021 bytes | HEMI-Powered@[email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | April 9th 08 12:01 AM |
Repost for new members: 1924 Chrysler B-70 'High Compression' Six Cylinder Engine Right svl (WPC Museum) 2 F.jpg 209752 bytes | HEMI-Powered@[email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | April 9th 08 12:00 AM |
Repost - 2001 pictures: 1924 Chrysler B-70 'High Compression' Six Cylinder Engine Right svl (WPC Museum) F.jpg 231021 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | March 18th 07 11:28 AM |
Regular vs High Test | Gary | Mazda | 2 | September 24th 05 01:41 AM |
1991 Toyota Tercel - Compression test too high | Daniel Beardsley | Technology | 11 | May 4th 05 04:44 PM |