If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
You have a mongrel, there.
It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment for. I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng guys might be able to help out. Rob hillpony wrote: > I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild > the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. The > casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've > done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino. > Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24 > spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66 > and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 > spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 and > underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover which > is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number > RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really > is would be great. > |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
trainfan1 > wrote in
et: > You have a mongrel, there. > > It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a > transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when > it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could have had either depending on build date. KB for. > > I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng > guys might be able to help out. > > Rob > > hillpony wrote: > >> I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild >> the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. The >> casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've >> done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino. >> Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24 >> spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66 >> and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 >> spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 and >> underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover which >> is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number >> RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really >> is would be great. >> > > -- Thunder Snake #9 "Protect" your rights or "lose" them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
Kevin Bottorff wrote:
> trainfan1 > wrote in > et: > > >>You have a mongrel, there. >> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when >>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment > > > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could > have had either depending on build date. KB Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6 bolt... this I am aware of. Rob > > > > for. > >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng >>guys might be able to help out. >> >>Rob >> >>hillpony wrote: >> >> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild >>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. > > The > >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've >>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino. >>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24 >>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66 >>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 >>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 > > and > >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover > > which > >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number >>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really >>>is would be great. >>> >> >> > > > |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?
My problem is this... I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8. Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the engine I have with And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder? Thanks. Andrew In article >, trainfan1 > wrote: > Kevin Bottorff wrote: > > > trainfan1 > wrote in > > et: > > > > > >>You have a mongrel, there. > >> > >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a > >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when > >>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment > > > > > > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could > > have had either depending on build date. KB > > Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6 > bolt... this I am aware of. > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > for. > > > >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng > >>guys might be able to help out. > >> > >>Rob > >> > >>hillpony wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild > >>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. > > > > The > > > >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've > >>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino. > >>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24 > >>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66 > >>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 > >>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 > > > > and > > > >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover > > > > which > > > >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number > >>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really > >>>is would be great. > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing.
the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings, and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need. "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message . .. > So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case? > > My problem is this... > > I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original engine, > it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 tranny was > from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a C4 tranny > but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I figured it > was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8. > > Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the > engine I have with > > And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny for > sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder? > > Thanks. > > Andrew > > > In article >, trainfan1 > > wrote: > >> Kevin Bottorff wrote: >> >> > trainfan1 > wrote in >> > et: >> > >> > >> >>You have a mongrel, there. >> >> >> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a >> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when >> >>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment >> > >> > >> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You >> > could >> > have had either depending on build date. KB >> >> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6 >> bolt... this I am aware of. >> >> Rob >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > for. >> > >> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng >> >>guys might be able to help out. >> >> >> >>Rob >> >> >> >>hillpony wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild >> >>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. >> > >> > The >> > >> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've >> >>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino. >> >>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24 >> >>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66 >> >>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 >> >>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 >> > >> > and >> > >> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover >> > >> > which >> > >> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number >> >>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really >> >>>is would be great. >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
"Tom" > wrote in
: > pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing. > the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings, > and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need. > "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message > . .. >> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case? >> >> My problem is this... >> >> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original >> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 >> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a >> C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I >> figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8. >> >> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the >> engine I have with >> >> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny >> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Andrew >> >> >> In article >, >> trainfan1 > wrote: >> >>> Kevin Bottorff wrote: >>> >>> > trainfan1 > wrote in >>> > et: >>> > >>> > >>> >>You have a mongrel, there. >>> >> >>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a >>> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s >>> >>when it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission >>> >>replacment >>> > >>> > >>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You >>> > could >>> > have had either depending on build date. KB >>> >>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6 >>> bolt... this I am aware of. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > for. >>> > >>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real >>> >>Mustng guys might be able to help out. >>> >> >>> >>Rob >>> >> >>> >>hillpony wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to >>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the >>> >>>identifing marks. >>> > >>> > The >>> > >>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if >>> >>>i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a >>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 >>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had >>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67 ford >>> >>>went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft. There >>> >>>is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 >>> > >>> > and >>> > >>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover >>> > >>> > which >>> > >>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting >>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out >>> >>>what it really is would be great. >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is what you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift lever. KB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
Hi Tom, Kevin,
Thanks for your input. I went to the shop today - the tranny that was in my stang is a 5-bolt. But this engine is from a '67 Mustang. My mechanic says I should only look for a C4 for an inline six, and not get one that was in a V8. Damn, had a line on a C4 but it is from an early 70s Ford with a 302. Anyone in southern Ontario got what I need? I'm fast running out of good Canadian weather in which to drive! Thanks. Andrew In article >, Kevin Bottorff > wrote: > "Tom" > wrote in > : > > > pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing. > > the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings, > > and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need. > > "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message > > . .. > >> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case? > >> > >> My problem is this... > >> > >> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original > >> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 > >> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a > >> C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I > >> figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8. > >> > >> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the > >> engine I have with > >> > >> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny > >> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Andrew > >> > >> > >> In article >, > >> trainfan1 > wrote: > >> > >>> Kevin Bottorff wrote: > >>> > >>> > trainfan1 > wrote in > >>> > et: > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >>You have a mongrel, there. > >>> >> > >>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a > >>> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s > >>> >>when it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission > >>> >>replacment > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You > >>> > could > >>> > have had either depending on build date. KB > >>> > >>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6 > >>> bolt... this I am aware of. > >>> > >>> Rob > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > for. > >>> > > >>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real > >>> >>Mustng guys might be able to help out. > >>> >> > >>> >>Rob > >>> >> > >>> >>hillpony wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to > >>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the > >>> >>>identifing marks. > >>> > > >>> > The > >>> > > >>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if > >>> >>>i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a > >>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 > >>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had > >>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67 ford > >>> >>>went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft. There > >>> >>>is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 > >>> > > >>> > and > >>> > > >>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover > >>> > > >>> > which > >>> > > >>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting > >>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out > >>> >>>what it really is would be great. > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is what > you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift lever. KB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
c4 identification troubles
Andrew Croft > wrote in
: > Hi Tom, Kevin, > > Thanks for your input. > > I went to the shop today - the tranny that was in my stang is a > 5-bolt. But this engine is from a '67 Mustang. > > My mechanic says I should only look for a C4 for an inline six, and > not get one that was in a V8. > > Damn, had a line on a C4 but it is from an early 70s Ford with a 302. > > Anyone in southern Ontario got what I need? I'm fast running out of > good Canadian weather in which to drive! > > Thanks. > > Andrew > > > In article >, Kevin > Bottorff > wrote: > >> "Tom" > wrote in >> : >> >> > pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell >> > housing. the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the >> > bellhousings, and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need. >> > "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message >> > . .. >> >> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case? >> >> >> >> My problem is this... >> >> >> >> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original >> >> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 >> >> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I >> >> got a C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 >> >> engine. I figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny >> >> was in a V8. >> >> >> >> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up >> >> the engine I have with >> >> >> >> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny >> >> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Andrew >> >> >> >> >> >> In article >, >> >> trainfan1 > wrote: >> >> >> >>> Kevin Bottorff wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > trainfan1 > wrote in >> >>> > et: >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >>You have a mongrel, there. >> >>> >> >> >>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, >> >>> >>& a transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the >> >>> >>early '70s when it was just an old car that someone needed a >> >>> >>transmission replacment >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. >> >>> > You could >> >>> > have had either depending on build date. KB >> >>> >> >>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger >> >>> 6 bolt... this I am aware of. >> >>> >> >>> Rob >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > for. >> >>> > >> >>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the >> >>> >>real Mustng guys might be able to help out. >> >>> >> >> >>> >>Rob >> >>> >> >> >>> >>hillpony wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to >> >>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the >> >>> >>>identifing marks. >> >>> > >> >>> > The >> >>> > >> >>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, >> >>> >>>if i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a >> >>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 >> >>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had >> >>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67 >> >>> >>>ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft. >> >>> >>> There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 >> >>> > >> >>> > and >> >>> > >> >>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump >> >>> >>>cover >> >>> > >> >>> > which >> >>> > >> >>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting >> >>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out >> >>> >>>what it really is would be great. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is >> what you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift >> lever. KB > Get the one from the V8. it will work fine. and be stronger too. KB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help with Identification | sticks | Corvette | 2 | March 2nd 06 01:25 PM |
VINTAGE: Modified Body Identification | OuTLaW | Antique cars | 5 | June 2nd 05 01:48 AM |
Engine identification | maxpower | Chrysler | 12 | October 16th 04 01:56 PM |
Engine identification | BeeP | Chrysler | 0 | October 10th 04 05:03 AM |
Help with car identification | Martin Schultz | Antique cars | 2 | November 29th 03 05:04 AM |