A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Ford Mustang
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

c4 identification troubles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 06, 02:37 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default c4 identification troubles

You have a mongrel, there.

It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when
it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment for.

I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng
guys might be able to help out.

Rob

hillpony wrote:

> I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild
> the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks. The
> casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've
> done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino.
> Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24
> spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66
> and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26
> spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1 and
> underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover which
> is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number
> RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really
> is would be great.
>

Ads
  #2  
Old June 29th 06, 04:05 PM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default c4 identification troubles

trainfan1 > wrote in
et:

> You have a mongrel, there.
>
> It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
> transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when
> it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment


No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could
have had either depending on build date. KB



for.
>
> I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng
> guys might be able to help out.
>
> Rob
>
> hillpony wrote:
>
>> I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild
>> the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks.

The
>> casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've
>> done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino.
>> Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24
>> spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66
>> and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26
>> spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1

and
>> underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover

which
>> is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number
>> RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really
>> is would be great.
>>

>
>




--
Thunder Snake #9
"Protect" your rights or "lose" them.

  #3  
Old June 30th 06, 01:16 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default c4 identification troubles

Kevin Bottorff wrote:

> trainfan1 > wrote in
> et:
>
>
>>You have a mongrel, there.
>>
>>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
>>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when
>>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment

>
>
> No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could
> have had either depending on build date. KB


Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6
bolt... this I am aware of.

Rob


>
>
>
> for.
>
>>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng
>>guys might be able to help out.
>>
>>Rob
>>
>>hillpony wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild
>>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks.

>
> The
>
>>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've
>>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino.
>>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24
>>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66
>>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26
>>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1

>
> and
>
>>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover

>
> which
>
>>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number
>>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really
>>>is would be great.
>>>

>>
>>

>
>
>

  #4  
Old August 22nd 08, 03:50 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Andrew Croft[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default c4 identification troubles

So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?

My problem is this...

I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original engine,
it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 tranny was
from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a C4 tranny
but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I figured it
was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8.

Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the
engine I have with

And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny for
sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder?

Thanks.

Andrew


In article >, trainfan1
> wrote:

> Kevin Bottorff wrote:
>
> > trainfan1 > wrote in
> > et:
> >
> >
> >>You have a mongrel, there.
> >>
> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when
> >>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment

> >
> >
> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You could
> > have had either depending on build date. KB

>
> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6
> bolt... this I am aware of.
>
> Rob
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > for.
> >
> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng
> >>guys might be able to help out.
> >>
> >>Rob
> >>
> >>hillpony wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild
> >>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks.

> >
> > The
> >
> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've
> >>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino.
> >>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24
> >>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66
> >>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26
> >>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1

> >
> > and
> >
> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover

> >
> > which
> >
> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number
> >>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really
> >>>is would be great.
> >>>
> >>
> >>

> >
> >
> >

  #5  
Old August 22nd 08, 10:19 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Tom[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default c4 identification troubles

pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing.
the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings, and put
the good trans on the bellhousing you need.
"Andrew Croft" > wrote in message
. ..
> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?
>
> My problem is this...
>
> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original engine,
> it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4 tranny was
> from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a C4 tranny
> but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I figured it
> was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8.
>
> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the
> engine I have with
>
> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny for
> sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> In article >, trainfan1
> > wrote:
>
>> Kevin Bottorff wrote:
>>
>> > trainfan1 > wrote in
>> > et:
>> >
>> >
>> >>You have a mongrel, there.
>> >>
>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
>> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s when
>> >>it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission replacment
>> >
>> >
>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You
>> > could
>> > have had either depending on build date. KB

>>
>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6
>> bolt... this I am aware of.
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > for.
>> >
>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real Mustng
>> >>guys might be able to help out.
>> >>
>> >>Rob
>> >>
>> >>hillpony wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to rebuild
>> >>>the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the identifing marks.
>> >
>> > The
>> >
>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if i've
>> >>>done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a fairlane/torino.
>> >>>Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5 bolt bell housing and 24
>> >>>spline input shaft. I thought I had read that those should be on a 66
>> >>>and earlier c4 where in 67 ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26
>> >>>spline input shaft. There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1
>> >
>> > and
>> >
>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover
>> >
>> > which
>> >
>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting number
>> >>>RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out what it really
>> >>>is would be great.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >



  #6  
Old August 23rd 08, 02:35 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Kevin Bottorff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default c4 identification troubles

"Tom" > wrote in
:

> pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing.
> the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings,
> and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need.
> "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?
>>
>> My problem is this...
>>
>> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original
>> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4
>> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a
>> C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I
>> figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8.
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the
>> engine I have with
>>
>> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny
>> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>> In article >,
>> trainfan1 > wrote:
>>
>>> Kevin Bottorff wrote:
>>>
>>> > trainfan1 > wrote in
>>> > et:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>You have a mongrel, there.
>>> >>
>>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
>>> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s
>>> >>when it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission
>>> >>replacment
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You
>>> > could
>>> > have had either depending on build date. KB
>>>
>>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6
>>> bolt... this I am aware of.
>>>
>>> Rob
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > for.
>>> >
>>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real
>>> >>Mustng guys might be able to help out.
>>> >>
>>> >>Rob
>>> >>
>>> >>hillpony wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to
>>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the
>>> >>>identifing marks.
>>> >
>>> > The
>>> >
>>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if
>>> >>>i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a
>>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5
>>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had
>>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67 ford
>>> >>>went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft. There
>>> >>>is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1
>>> >
>>> > and
>>> >
>>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover
>>> >
>>> > which
>>> >
>>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting
>>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out
>>> >>>what it really is would be great.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >

>
>
>


You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is what
you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift lever. KB
  #7  
Old August 24th 08, 03:55 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Andrew Croft[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default c4 identification troubles

Hi Tom, Kevin,

Thanks for your input.

I went to the shop today - the tranny that was in my stang is a 5-bolt.
But this engine is from a '67 Mustang.

My mechanic says I should only look for a C4 for an inline six, and not
get one that was in a V8.

Damn, had a line on a C4 but it is from an early 70s Ford with a 302.

Anyone in southern Ontario got what I need? I'm fast running out of
good Canadian weather in which to drive!

Thanks.

Andrew


In article >, Kevin
Bottorff > wrote:

> "Tom" > wrote in
> :
>
> > pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell housing.
> > the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the bellhousings,
> > and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need.
> > "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message
> > . ..
> >> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?
> >>
> >> My problem is this...
> >>
> >> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original
> >> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4
> >> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I got a
> >> C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67 engine. I
> >> figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny was in a V8.
> >>
> >> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up the
> >> engine I have with
> >>
> >> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny
> >> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >>
> >> In article >,
> >> trainfan1 > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Kevin Bottorff wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > trainfan1 > wrote in
> >>> > et:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >>You have a mongrel, there.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289, & a
> >>> >>transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the early '70s
> >>> >>when it was just an old car that someone needed a transmission
> >>> >>replacment
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67. You
> >>> > could
> >>> > have had either depending on build date. KB
> >>>
> >>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger 6
> >>> bolt... this I am aware of.
> >>>
> >>> Rob
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > for.
> >>> >
> >>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the real
> >>> >>Mustng guys might be able to help out.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>Rob
> >>> >>
> >>> >>hillpony wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to
> >>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the
> >>> >>>identifing marks.
> >>> >
> >>> > The
> >>> >
> >>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040, if
> >>> >>>i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a
> >>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5
> >>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had
> >>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67 ford
> >>> >>>went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft. There
> >>> >>>is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1
> >>> >
> >>> > and
> >>> >
> >>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump cover
> >>> >
> >>> > which
> >>> >
> >>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting
> >>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out
> >>> >>>what it really is would be great.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >

> >
> >
> >

>
> You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is what
> you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift lever. KB

  #8  
Old August 24th 08, 04:44 AM posted to alt.autos.ford,rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Kevin Bottorff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default c4 identification troubles

Andrew Croft > wrote in
:

> Hi Tom, Kevin,
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> I went to the shop today - the tranny that was in my stang is a
> 5-bolt. But this engine is from a '67 Mustang.
>
> My mechanic says I should only look for a C4 for an inline six, and
> not get one that was in a V8.
>
> Damn, had a line on a C4 but it is from an early 70s Ford with a 302.
>
> Anyone in southern Ontario got what I need? I'm fast running out of
> good Canadian weather in which to drive!
>
> Thanks.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> In article >, Kevin
> Bottorff > wrote:
>
>> "Tom" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > pre 65 had a 5 bolt bellhousing. after 65 had a six bolt bell
>> > housing. the transmission is the same for both. just unbolt the
>> > bellhousings, and put the good trans on the bellhousing you need.
>> > "Andrew Croft" > wrote in message
>> > . ..
>> >> So a C4 is a C4 is a C4 isn't necessarily the case?
>> >>
>> >> My problem is this...
>> >>
>> >> I have a '65 six cylinder coupe that does not have the original
>> >> engine, it currently has a '67 six cylinder but I believe the C4
>> >> tranny was from the original '65. Now the tranny is slipping. I
>> >> got a C4 tranny but my mechanic says it won't bolt up to the '67
>> >> engine. I figured it was just the bellhousings - this new tranny
>> >> was in a V8.
>> >>
>> >> Any help would be appreciated - what I need to look at to line up
>> >> the engine I have with
>> >>
>> >> And anyone in southern Ontario or upstate NY have a good C4 tranny
>> >> for sale? And can guarantee it will bold onto a '67 6 cylinder?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Andrew
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In article >,
>> >> trainfan1 > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Kevin Bottorff wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > trainfan1 > wrote in
>> >>> > et:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>You have a mongrel, there.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>It looks like you have a Mustang with an earlier than '66 289,
>> >>> >>& a transmission that was rebuilt/exchanged probably in the
>> >>> >>early '70s when it was just an old car that someone needed a
>> >>> >>transmission replacment
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > No. the eng. and trany change was a running change made in 67.
>> >>> > You could
>> >>> > have had either depending on build date. KB
>> >>>
>> >>> Ahh, I'm pretty sure by '66 all the bellhousings were the larger
>> >>> 6 bolt... this I am aware of.
>> >>>
>> >>> Rob
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > for.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>I cross-posted this to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang so the
>> >>> >>real Mustng guys might be able to help out.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>Rob
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>hillpony wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>>I have a 66 mustang with a 289 and a c4. I'm getting ready to
>> >>> >>>rebuild the c4 but I'm getting alittle confused with the
>> >>> >>>identifing marks.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>casting number on the tail piece of the tranny is c7op-7a040,
>> >>> >>>if i've done my research right this should be a 67 c4 off a
>> >>> >>>fairlane/torino. Now where i'm getting confused with is the 5
>> >>> >>>bolt bell housing and 24 spline input shaft. I thought I had
>> >>> >>>read that those should be on a 66 and earlier c4 where in 67
>> >>> >>>ford went to a 6 bolt bellhousing and a 26 spline input shaft.
>> >>> >>> There is a metal tag on the tranny with PEA M1
>> >>> >
>> >>> > and
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>underneath that is C9APABM4. Another number is on the pump
>> >>> >>>cover
>> >>> >
>> >>> > which
>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>is C6AP-7D027-C. It is an aluminium bellhousing with casting
>> >>> >>>number RF-C5AP-7976-B. Any help with the numbers to find out
>> >>> >>>what it really is would be great.
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >

>>
>> You need to be sure that both are from a floor shift car if that is
>> what you have now. other wise you will have to change the shift
>> lever. KB

>


Get the one from the V8. it will work fine. and be stronger too. KB
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with Identification sticks Corvette 2 March 2nd 06 01:25 PM
VINTAGE: Modified Body Identification OuTLaW Antique cars 5 June 2nd 05 01:48 AM
Engine identification maxpower Chrysler 12 October 16th 04 01:56 PM
Engine identification BeeP Chrysler 0 October 10th 04 05:03 AM
Help with car identification Martin Schultz Antique cars 2 November 29th 03 05:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.