Three narcs invade home of 92 y/o women - SHE SHOOTS THEM ALL

You nailed it right. Most White males are fat-assed PC pussies. Old
negress deserves an award.

ted

http://www.resist.com/ Aryan Resistance



Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> Of course the cops then murdered her, but she showed more spunk than
> most gunowners who are just big-mouth no-action cowards.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101856_pf.html
>
> Woman, 92, Dies in Shootout With Police
>
> The Associated Press
> Wednesday, November 22, 2006; 12:18 AM
>
> ATLANTA -- A 92-year-old woman was shot to death Tuesday after she
> fired at three narcotics officers trying to serve a warrant at her
> house, officials said.
>
> Neighbors and relatives said it must have been a case of mistaken
> identity. Police said they had the right address.
>
> Police said the woman, identified as Kathryn Johnson, was the only
> person home at the time, and had lived there for about 17 years.
>
> As the plainclothes Atlanta police officers approached the house about
> 7 p.m., a woman inside started shooting, striking each of them, said
> Officer Joe Cobb, a police spokesman.
>
> Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and
> "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they
> were justified in returning fire when they were fired upon.
>
> One was hit in the arm, another in a thigh and the third in a
> shoulder. The officers were taken to a hospital for treatment, and all
> three were conscious and alert, police said.
>
> Sarah Dozier, identified as a niece of the woman, told WAGA-TV that
> there were never any drugs at the house.
>
> "My aunt was in good health. I'm sure she panicked when they kicked
> that door down," Dozier said. "There was no reason they had to go in
> there and shoot her down like a dog."

Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
> wrote in message
oups.com...
> You nailed it right. Most White males are fat-assed PC pussies. Old
> negress deserves an award.
>
> ted
>
> http://www.resist.com/ Aryan Resistance
>
>
>
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> > Of course the cops then murdered her, but she showed more spunk than
> > most gunowners who are just big-mouth no-action cowards.
> >
> >
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...101856_pf.html
> >
> > Woman, 92, Dies in Shootout With Police
> >
> > The Associated Press
> > Wednesday, November 22, 2006; 12:18 AM
> >
> > ATLANTA -- A 92-year-old woman was shot to death Tuesday after she
> > fired at three narcotics officers trying to serve a warrant at her
> > house, officials said.
> >
> > Neighbors and relatives said it must have been a case of mistaken
> > identity. Police said they had the right address.
> >
> > Police said the woman, identified as Kathryn Johnson, was the only
> > person home at the time, and had lived there for about 17 years.
> >
> > As the plainclothes Atlanta police officers approached the house about
> > 7 p.m., a woman inside started shooting, striking each of them, said
> > Officer Joe Cobb, a police spokesman.
> >
> > Assistant Chief Alan Dreher said the officers had a legal warrant and
> > "knocked and announced" before they forced open the door. He said they
> > were justified in returning fire when they were fired upon.
> >
> > One was hit in the arm, another in a thigh and the third in a
> > shoulder. The officers were taken to a hospital for treatment, and all
> > three were conscious and alert, police said.
> >
> > Sarah Dozier, identified as a niece of the woman, told WAGA-TV that
> > there were never any drugs at the house.
> >
> > "My aunt was in good health. I'm sure she panicked when they kicked
> > that door down," Dozier said. "There was no reason they had to go in
> > there and shoot her down like a dog."
>

In article >, ToddPriest2 wrote:
> Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.

Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds most
dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
organizations being governments.

Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
on a warrant.

This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
put in their bodies of their own free will.

Brent P wrote:

> In article >, ToddPriest2 wrote:
>
>>Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
>
>
> Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
> directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds most
> dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
> organizations being governments.
>
> Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
> women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
> Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
> on a warrant.
>
> This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
> For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
> snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
> put in their bodies of their own free will.
>
>
Henry? Is that you?

She was allowing dope to be ran out of the home.Polluting the area with
drugs.She was a saint?
"pieface" > wrote in message
news:Wk49h.155482$aJ.107987@attbi_s21...
> Brent P wrote:
>
> > In article >, ToddPriest2
wrote:
> >
> >>Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
> >
> >
> > Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
> > directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds
most
> > dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
> > organizations being governments.
> >
> > Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
> > women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
> > Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
> > on a warrant.
> >
> > This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
> > For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
> > snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
> > put in their bodies of their own free will.
> >
> >
> Henry? Is that you?

"Brent P" > wrote in message
. ..
> In article >, ToddPriest2
> wrote:
>> Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
>
> Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
> directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds most
> dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
> organizations being governments.
>
> Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
> women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
> Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
> on a warrant.

Let's make sure the grandkids didn't have a meth lab in the garage first-

> This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
> For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
> snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
> put in their bodies of their own free will.

Well it is, because all you free will types freely help yourselves to my
TV so you can (semi) privately top off, or then you beat your chick until
she puts for cash out so you can afford to be (semi) privately stoned.

The fact is, if you people could handle your joneses like adults, little
old ladies wouldn't get shot by SWAT teams.

Who's more at fault, them or you?

Personally, I say legalize- spend the enforcement money on the border, or
something worthwhile.

But I don't want any government money going to your support or rehab.

You made your choice to be privately free- now you pay for it.

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:55:24 GMT, "ToddPriest2"
> wrote:

>She was allowing dope to be ran out of the home.Polluting the area with
>drugs.She was a saint?

Yes.


>"pieface" > wrote in message
>news:Wk49h.155482$aJ.107987@attbi_s21...
>> Brent P wrote:
>>
>> > In article >, ToddPriest2
>wrote:
>> >
>> >>Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
>> >
>> >
>> > Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
>> > directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds
>most
>> > dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
>> > organizations being governments.
>> >
>> > Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
>> > women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
>> > Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
>> > on a warrant.
>> >
>> > This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
>> > For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
>> > snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
>> > put in their bodies of their own free will.
>> >
>> >
>> Henry? Is that you?
>

ToddPriest2 wrote:
>
> She was allowing dope to be ran out of the home.Polluting the area with
> drugs.She was a saint?


What narcotics are they alleging were purchased at the house?


Maybe it is about time the police started operating during
business hours instead of acting like Rambo and using undercover
cops to raid a suspected drug operation and their no knock search
warrants. There have been far too many deaths resulting these
searches, including a number where the police had the wrong
address. Combine this with the national attitude about gun
control and any Tom Dick or Harry can se deadly force without
identifying targets and we are bound to see repeats of this
unfortunate incident.

Dave Smith wrote:
>
> ToddPriest2 wrote:
>
>>She was allowing dope to be ran out of the home.Polluting the area with
>>drugs.She was a saint?
>
>
>
> What narcotics are they alleging were purchased at the house?
>
>
> Maybe it is about time the police started operating during
> business hours instead of acting like Rambo and using undercover
> cops to raid a suspected drug operation and their no knock search
> warrants. There have been far too many deaths resulting these
> searches, including a number where the police had the wrong
> address. Combine this with the national attitude about gun
> control and any Tom Dick or Harry can se deadly force without
> identifying targets and we are bound to see repeats of this
> unfortunate incident.

It's true, home invasion is risky business. Even if you do have a
warrant.

How is a 92 year old sitting in a back room supposed to hear or
understand what some people outside are yelling about? Even if she
could hear them, how is she supposed to know they're telling the truth
about being police? It's a risky proposition.

Douglas W "Popeye" Frederick pretended :
> "Brent P" > wrote in message
> . ..
>> In article >, ToddPriest2
>> wrote:
>>> Goes to show that scum comes in all ages.
>>
>> Now one is scum to defend one's self and home against the wrongly
>> directed armed force of the government? History shows us, the worlds most
>> dangerous criminals are the ones in government, the most dangerous
>> organizations being governments.
>>
>> Sad. Once upon a time the government busting down the doors of elderly
>> women who had done nothing to anyone would have been considered wrong.
>> Guess not any more. Now it's just a tragic mistake of the wrong address
>> on a warrant.
>
> Let's make sure the grandkids didn't have a meth lab in the garage first-
>
>> This story is yet another example of how much we have lost as a people.
>> For what? The vain effort to keep someone from smoking a joint or
>> snorting some cocaine? As if it's the government's business what people
>> put in their bodies of their own free will.
>
> Well it is, because all you free will types freely help yourselves to my TV
> so you can (semi) privately top off, or then you beat your chick until she
> puts for cash out so you can afford to be (semi) privately stoned.
>
> The fact is, if you people could handle your joneses like adults, little
> old ladies wouldn't get shot by SWAT teams.
>
> Who's more at fault, them or you?
>
> Personally, I say legalize- spend the enforcement money on the border, or
> something worthwhile.
>
> But I don't want any government money going to your support or rehab.
>
> You made your choice to be privately free- now you pay for it.

If you deal drugs that is not far from murder. You know the effect,
what the difference between dealing drugs and poisining someone?

Top