If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
Tim M. wrote:
If only Chevy could apply the world class formula they > have in the Corvette to a 7/8's or 3/4 scale Solstice/Sky, then I > could enjoy one of those! http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Arch.../msg00066.html Pat |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
"Tim M." wrote:
> >I want a 1959 Chevy El Camino (based on the Bel Air chassis) but >modified like this: > >http://www.truckinweb.com/features/0.../photo_05.html > But does it have a HUGE TAK? Iva & Vixen (Sorry, I couldn't resist!) 2004 Classic Red No more winkin' Miata |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
On Oct 15, 7:56*pm, pws > wrote:
> Tim M. wrote: > > If only Chevy could apply the world class formula they > > > have in the Corvette to a 7/8's or 3/4 scale Solstice/Sky, then I > > could enjoy one of those! > > http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Arch...akers.mazda.mi... > > Pat I've driven and have friends who own Corvettes as both daily drivers and track cars, as well as a good, close friend who has raced both Corvettes and Miatas, and my experiences with them have been nothing like that particular description. The current Corvette is very light, very agile, as well as stunningly fast, incredible handling, and has great brakes that are completely up to the task of slowing the car on both the road and at the track. Definitely a world class car in every respect. Likewise, I've had nothing but stellar experiences with Chevy dealers in the last 10 years, and of all the Chevy vehicles I've owned in the last 10 years, I've had exactly one problem, which was taken care of in one visit to the dealer, under warranty. So, while I love my current Miata (and am enjoying it more each day, which I find hard to believe considering how much it is already making me smile) and I loved my '92 Miata (which is still my oldest son's daily driver to this day) and I love cheering on my middle son racing his '90 Miata (and if I go back to racing, it will almost 100% certainly be in a Miata), I will continue to keep my eyes and ears open for other cars (trucks, motorcycles) by other manufacturers, foreign or domestic, that fit my needs and desires, and if the vehicle seems right to me, I'll buy it and take my chances that it, too, will make me as happy as my other choices have in the past. Heck, I might even someday buy another BMW, even though the one that I owned was the worst built car I've ever ownedf and had the most problems of any new car I ever bought, and causedf me to have to do business with the worst (three different) automobile dealers I've ever dealt with! Right now, I'm looking forward to test driving an Abarth Fiat 500 as soon as Chrysler/Fiat brings them to the U.S. next year! |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
Tim, now that'll be a fun car! In fact it sounds like it's going to be an
interesting enough vehicle to entice you ;-) You know when Michael Schumacher was on Top Gear, he said that's his daily driver (when he's not driving the kids around in the 'estate') Chris 99BBB Tim wrote: "Right now, I'm looking forward to test driving an Abarth Fiat 500 as soon as Chrysler/Fiat brings them to the U.S. next year! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
Tim M. wrote:
> I've driven and have friends who own Corvettes as both daily drivers > and track cars, as well as a good, close friend who has raced both > Corvettes and Miatas, and my experiences with them have been nothing > like that particular description. The current Corvette is very > light, very agile, as well as stunningly fast, incredible handling, > and has great brakes that are completely up to the task of slowing the > car on both the road and at the track. Definitely a world class car > in every respect. > > Likewise, I've had nothing but stellar experiences with Chevy dealers > in the last 10 years, and of all the Chevy vehicles I've owned in the > last 10 years, I've had exactly one problem, which was taken care of > in one visit to the dealer, under warranty. > > So, while I love my current Miata (and am enjoying it more each day, > which I find hard to believe considering how much it is already making > me smile) and I loved my '92 Miata (which is still my oldest son's > daily driver to this day) and I love cheering on my middle son racing > his '90 Miata (and if I go back to racing, it will almost 100% > certainly be in a Miata), I will continue to keep my eyes and ears > open for other cars (trucks, motorcycles) by other manufacturers, > foreign or domestic, that fit my needs and desires, and if the vehicle > seems right to me, I'll buy it and take my chances that it, too, will > make me as happy as my other choices have in the past. Heck, I might > even someday buy another BMW, even though the one that I owned was the > worst built car I've ever ownedf and had the most problems of any new > car I ever bought, and causedf me to have to do business with the > worst (three different) automobile dealers I've ever dealt with! > > Right now, I'm looking forward to test driving an Abarth Fiat 500 as > soon as Chrysler/Fiat brings them to the U.S. next year! I am glad that you have had such good luck with domestic vehicles. If my luck with them was half as good as what you report, I might also consider buying another one. My life experience is that American vehicles are poorly-made products that are generally beaten, and beaten badly, by the Japanese competition. At the risk of repeating myself, the automotive sales numbers make a far stronger argument than either one of us ever will. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ma...lling_us_cars/ Pat |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
Iva wrote:
> But does it have a HUGE TAK? > > Iva & Vixen > (Sorry, I couldn't resist!) > 2004 Classic Red > No more winkin' Miata What qualifies as a "HUGE TAK!"? I saw one that was 5 inches across at Autozone, but that seems medium-sized at best. If anyone has a TAK! that is more HUGE than 5 inches, I want to see it, and probably, to buy it to install in my Miata. The legend of the HUGE TAK! Miata shall never die..........That car was "fast, fast, & yup, ferious!", according to the ad. :-) Pat |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
In article >, pws >
wrote: > That car was > "fast, fast, & yup, ferious!", according to the ad. He obviously misspelled "ferrous." Are you sure the car didn't actually have a HUGH TAK? -- Lanny Chambers St. Louis, MO '94C |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
That's a very interesting (and insightful) look at the automotive history of
the past, right up till now! Couple thoughts, with all those years of so many Americans buying ****ty American cars (Chevettes and Citations and such) how could you NOT have a populace with a lingering bad taste in their mouth! They were selling ****ty cars to Americans who were buying them in great part, solely on the Nationalistic view that it was good for America. Honestly, it would have been better for America in the long run to realize (earlier) that the best way to sell a **** load of cars is to build great cars, not to wrap them in the flag like GM and the others did for so long! That's what I call (sadly) good marketing in place of good product! What fun to see the battle displayed like that! Reminds me of when the Taurus was a great car. I owned one that first year in 1986 and loved it. It had it's (American) flaws (cheap interior with mediocre ergonomics) but, it had the look of the future! Thanks Pat. Chris 99BBB "pws" > wrote in message ... > Tim M. wrote: >> I've driven and have friends who own Corvettes as both daily drivers >> and track cars, as well as a good, close friend who has raced both >> Corvettes and Miatas, and my experiences with them have been nothing >> like that particular description. The current Corvette is very >> light, very agile, as well as stunningly fast, incredible handling, >> and has great brakes that are completely up to the task of slowing the >> car on both the road and at the track. Definitely a world class car >> in every respect. >> >> Likewise, I've had nothing but stellar experiences with Chevy dealers >> in the last 10 years, and of all the Chevy vehicles I've owned in the >> last 10 years, I've had exactly one problem, which was taken care of >> in one visit to the dealer, under warranty. >> >> So, while I love my current Miata (and am enjoying it more each day, >> which I find hard to believe considering how much it is already making >> me smile) and I loved my '92 Miata (which is still my oldest son's >> daily driver to this day) and I love cheering on my middle son racing >> his '90 Miata (and if I go back to racing, it will almost 100% >> certainly be in a Miata), I will continue to keep my eyes and ears >> open for other cars (trucks, motorcycles) by other manufacturers, >> foreign or domestic, that fit my needs and desires, and if the vehicle >> seems right to me, I'll buy it and take my chances that it, too, will >> make me as happy as my other choices have in the past. Heck, I might >> even someday buy another BMW, even though the one that I owned was the >> worst built car I've ever ownedf and had the most problems of any new >> car I ever bought, and causedf me to have to do business with the >> worst (three different) automobile dealers I've ever dealt with! >> >> Right now, I'm looking forward to test driving an Abarth Fiat 500 as >> soon as Chrysler/Fiat brings them to the U.S. next year! > > I am glad that you have had such good luck with domestic vehicles. If my > luck with them was half as good as what you report, I might also consider > buying another one. > > My life experience is that American vehicles are poorly-made products that > are generally beaten, and beaten badly, by the Japanese competition. > > At the risk of repeating myself, the automotive sales numbers make a far > stronger argument than either one of us ever will. > > http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ma...lling_us_cars/ > > Pat |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
On Oct 16, 8:15*pm, "Chris D'Agnolo" > wrote:
> That's a very interesting (and insightful) look at the automotive history of > the past, right up till now! > > Couple thoughts, with all those years of so many Americans buying ****ty > American cars (Chevettes and Citations and such) how could you NOT have a > populace with a lingering bad taste in their mouth! They were selling ****ty > cars to Americans who were buying them in great part, solely on the > Nationalistic view that it was good for America. Honestly, it would have > been better for America in the long run to realize (earlier) that the best > way to sell a **** load of cars is to build great cars, not to wrap them in > the flag like GM and the others did for so long! That's what I call (sadly) > good marketing in place of good product! > > What fun to see the battle displayed like that! Reminds me of when the > Taurus was a great car. I owned one that first year in 1986 and loved it. It > had it's (American) flaws (cheap interior with mediocre ergonomics) but, it > had the look of the future! The "bad" American cars I owned ranged from 1974 to 1985 and ended abruptly right there. Even the "bad" ones were totally reliable and inexpensive to own and operate. They were bad because Detroit was reeling; trying to accomodate unleaded fuel, catalytic converters, 5- mph bumper laws, and low compression engines all at once. I remember Toyota and Honda owners who predicted all sorts of dire consequences for me when I bought my brand new, first year of production, 1988 Chevy Beretta 2.8L GT. I owned it for 75,000 miles before my kids got too big for the back seat and sold it to buy a used 1987 Ford Taurus station wagon. The Beretta required one set of tires and a $12 Trak Auto water pump during my ownership of it. Well made? Well, it didn't have a rattle or a creak when I sold it. I bought the Taurus with 59,000 miles on it and we sold it for $1,500 less than I paid for it seven years later, with 129,000 miles on it. During that 70,000 miles, in addition to a set of tires, it required a set of front brake pads, the front brake rotors were turned once, and I put a $33 rebuilt alternator in it. So, I've enjoyed the recovery of the American car manufacturers and their products since they started making quality products again (for less than the imports, too) 24 or 25 years ago. Just waiting for the facts to catch up to the popular media and the average American on the street. There is one good thing about the general disdain and distaste that Americans have for American cars, though. It allows people like my 20- year-old college student daughter to buy a 2-year-old off-lease Cadillac CTS-V with 17,000 miles on it, a 406 hp all aluminum V8, a 6- speed manual transmission, independent rear suspension, four huge disk brakes, butter soft leather interior, for less than 50% of its original MSRP in 2007, with a full warranty as a GM certified used car, all on a part-time Karate instructor's pay. Even used, even three years old now, even with another 13,000 miles on it, she hasn't yet had a single thing go wrong with it. It's kind of the opposite of my experience with my BMW Z3 3.0i Coupe, which I bought new and then spent over nine trips to various dealers trying to get it to run properly before giving up after 17 months and dumping it. Of course, when all the American car companies are out of business, there will be no more bargains like that to be had. It will be interesting to see what Americans think of paying world prices for their import and captive import cars when the domestic competition is gone. (Oh, and I had a used Chevy Citation X11 that was far from a terrible car, either. Bought it from a guy going overseas for $10 (yes, $10) because it wouldn't pass emissions or safety inspections in Virginia, even though it only had 90,000 miles on it. Replaced the air injection tubing on the exhaust manifold where one 90-degree bend had rusted through, and put an aftermarket muffler on it to replace the rusted out original, 15-year-old item, buffed out the faded paint, passed both inspections easily, and sold it for $650 with one weekend on display at my local supermarket parking lot. Yeah, that one had a rattle or two. Just AWFUL!) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
1959 Bel Air versus 2009 Malibu - NMC but at least car-related
In article
>, "Tim M." > wrote: > The "bad" American cars I owned ranged from 1974 to 1985 and ended > abruptly right there. Even the "bad" ones were totally reliable and > inexpensive to own and operate. They were bad because Detroit was > reeling; trying to accomodate unleaded fuel, catalytic converters, 5- > mph bumper laws, and low compression engines all at once. Foreign manufacturers had to comply with the same regs if they wanted to sell cars here. But instead of wasting time and money lobbying against the law, they put it into engineering and were ready, for the most part. In particular, domestic car companies resisted making good small cars until their opportunity was lost, skimping on quality and features on the assumption that everyone bought cars by the pound. They were wrong, and by the time--decades later--that they realized their mistake, it was too late. And they STILL don't make good small cars, just cheap ones. Reliable and inexpensive aren't the only characteristics of good cars. American car design has always been gross--huge, garish splashes of chrome instead of restrained style, interiors that look like they came out of either army trucks or whorehouses, enormous panel gaps, terrible seats, miserable handling and brakes. No finesse. The American public at large didn't, until Japanese cars, know there was an alternative. But it's why American cars have never sold well in Europe: they're seen as ill-conceived junk thrown together by monkeys, not something one would want to spend a proportionately-higher fraction of one's annual income to buy. Even the current Corvette, with its stunning performance, is cheaply built. Floppy, flimsy plastic bumpers, hard plastic inside, outsized styling details--they're clown cars to the rest of the world, where the market hasn't been brainwashed into wanting a truck with a massive chrome grille. -- Lanny Chambers St. Louis, MO '94C |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
J vin versus 1 vin? | alfred[_3_] | Honda | 2 | November 22nd 07 05:56 PM |
525 versus 530 | bmoag | BMW | 6 | February 28th 06 01:41 AM |
CR-V -versus- Rav 4 | fish | Honda | 21 | December 19th 05 06:53 AM |