If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear
Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, it has announced plans for increased production at the currently hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler has really identified all its fat. Its not just in the workforce. It is in the cars and trucks. At the Chrysler unit, the new Dodge Dakota, which, perhaps only coincidentally, is selling poorly, picked up 600 pounds in its re-design, all for a paltry additional 2 inches back seat room. But it merely followed the example of the Pacifica: over 4000 pounds for a six passenger vehicle that has all the luggage space - in both shape and volume - of a 78 Plymouth Horizon. The Pacifica isn't even in the same league as Chrysler's all time weight efficient 6 passenger vehicle: the (then) downsized 79 New Yorker, Newport, and St. Regis, at under 3800 pounds. The extra weight is generally not evident on the road, thanks to Chrysler's potent engines. But it is at the gas station. And it certainly takes a toll in increased wear of mechanical parts. It may not matter, however, if the Chrysler unit can convince customers the extra weight means greater quality. Mercedes has been quite successful, until recently, with this strategy. Mercedes' economy car, the C230, makes its tires scream with a hefty load of 3405 pounds. In contrast, a Honda Civic with 5 cubic feet greater combined capacity weighs 777 pounds less. But there is always opportunity. With the added weight, Lee Iacocca may be tagging Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep commercials with "Built like a Mercedes". Of course, if that turns out to be true, Chrysler Financial will soon be in the business of offering car equity loans for the repair bills. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Comments4u wrote: > With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear > Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, > it has announced plans for increased production at the currently > hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely > cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler > has really identified all its fat. No. It's about getting America off its lardy ass and competing at world standard productivity levels. Compete or die. The world is hungry for jobs and there's no space for lazy weaklings. Graham |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take back it's
industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and the EPA being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. If you want to buy American, it needs to be OWNED and built here. Japan and Germany didn't lose WW II, they just waited and bought us off. Budd "Pooh Bear" > wrote in message ... > > > Comments4u wrote: > >> With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear >> Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, >> it has announced plans for increased production at the currently >> hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely >> cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler >> has really identified all its fat. > > No. It's about getting America off its lardy ass and competing at > world standard productivity levels. > > Compete or die. The world is hungry for jobs and there's no space for > lazy weaklings. > > Graham > |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Well said, Mr. Cochran! Well said!
Bud (with one 'd') "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@preciscom SPAM.net> wrote in message m... > No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take back > it's industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and the EPA > being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. > > If you want to buy American, it needs to be OWNED and built here. > > Japan and Germany didn't lose WW II, they just waited and bought us off. > > Budd > > "Pooh Bear" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> Comments4u wrote: >> >>> With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear >>> Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, >>> it has announced plans for increased production at the currently >>> hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely >>> cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler >>> has really identified all its fat. >> >> No. It's about getting America off its lardy ass and competing at >> world standard productivity levels. >> >> Compete or die. The world is hungry for jobs and there's no space for >> lazy weaklings. >> >> Graham >> > > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Budd Cochran wrote:
> No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take > back it's industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and > the EPA being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. > > If you want to buy American, it needs to be OWNED and built here. > > Japan and Germany didn't lose WW II, they just waited and bought us > off. That's put me off Jaguar, Volvo, Saab, Land Rover, Ford, Vauxhall, and all the other American owned brands we buy in Europe then. F*** 'um foreign things. We'll buy European domestic products like Renault, Fiat and Peugeot instead. But wait, how does nationalism and protectionism help all those American Ford and GM brands? Oh it doesn't, it guarantees even bigger losses for them. Perhaps Americans only believe in free trade when the going is good for them? Yes that is probably it. Fact is, there is only one way to stem those losses at Ford and GM and that is for them to become more efficient and trade their way out. It can be done. Just look at the example of Nissan which under French management has been transformed from imminent bancruptcy to a modern success story in less than ten years. There is nothing magical about Japanese or German industry. Just look at the present debacle at Mitsubishi which Daimler/Chrysler could not turn around. If you want a global recession where you are absolutely guaranteed to have fewer sales and total business failures then certainly go protectionist. If you want continued relitive prosperity and employment then become competitive and grow your economy. There is no stopping China and other major competitors becoming more prosperous because they are coming around to the American way of doing business. If enough trade is done both ways then both economies win. Obviously America has more to lose and China has more to win but what you need is a win/win situation. It is inevitable though that China will become a stronger economy than the USA in the medium term. Huw |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
"Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@preciscom SPAM.net> wrote in message m... > No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take back > it's industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and the EPA > being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. How about we cut your pension or however you get paid. I'm so sick of hearing cut the employees wages as part of the cure all end all. Who the hell here can afford a pay cut? Roy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Yet not a word about GM whose entire Chevy lineup contained just three cars
compared to its six SUV's. One of those cars is the Corvette, not exactly a best seller, given its small market share. Nor any word on Ford, which was almost as guilty as GM in the bias towards SUV's. Nor any word on how Ford just announced closure of > 14 < plants in the U.S. While DC is cutting jobs, one should note that those jobs will come off the roster of executives. Addditionally, 75% of those jobs are being cut in DC headquarters homeland, Germany. Further, while the weight of vehicles is noted, what isn't noted is the fact that each of those vehicles was the ONLY offering from that particular nameplate in each market segment. Dodge has ONE SUV, not six like Chevy. But I suspect none of that matters, as the author of the original post is likely just another whiner in a long line of those concerned about oil consumption. If you are that concerned sir, take up the cause of rail transport with your congresssman. A good rail system will cut use of personal vehicles and lower the number of tractor trailers on the highways. This will save far more fuel than a Dodge Durango that weighs 600 pounds less. -- Max "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) "Comments4u" > wrote in message ... > With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear > Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, > it has announced plans for increased production at the currently > hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely > cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler > has really identified all its fat. Its not just in the workforce. > It is in the cars and trucks. > > At the Chrysler unit, the new Dodge Dakota, which, perhaps only > coincidentally, is selling poorly, picked up 600 pounds in its > re-design, all for a paltry additional 2 inches back seat room. > But it merely followed the example of the Pacifica: over > 4000 pounds for a six passenger vehicle that has all the > luggage space - in both shape and volume - of a 78 Plymouth > Horizon. The Pacifica isn't even in the same league as Chrysler's > all time weight efficient 6 passenger vehicle: the (then) > downsized 79 New Yorker, Newport, and St. Regis, at under 3800 > pounds. > > The extra weight is generally not evident on the road, thanks to > Chrysler's potent engines. But it is at the gas station. And > it certainly takes a toll in increased wear of mechanical > parts. > > It may not matter, however, if the Chrysler unit can convince > customers the extra weight means greater quality. Mercedes has > been quite successful, until recently, with this strategy. > Mercedes' economy car, the C230, makes its tires scream with > a hefty load of 3405 pounds. In contrast, a Honda Civic with > 5 cubic feet greater combined capacity weighs 777 pounds less. > > But there is always opportunity. With the added weight, > Lee Iacocca may be tagging Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep > commercials with "Built like a Mercedes". Of course, if > that turns out to be true, Chrysler Financial will soon > be in the business of offering car equity loans for the > repair bills. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Max Dodge wrote:
> > But I suspect none of that matters, as the author of the original > post is likely just another whiner in a long line of those concerned > about oil consumption. If you are that concerned sir, take up the > cause of rail transport with your congresssman. A good rail system > will cut use of personal vehicles Yes it will do that but fuel use per passenger mile is higher by train and passengers still have to get to the station and from the station to their destination at the other end. and lower the number of tractor > trailers on the highways. This will save far more fuel than a Dodge > Durango that weighs 600 pounds less. > As above, the freight has to reach the station be handled onto the train, offloaded and trucked to its final detination. Hardly efficient and not likely to save a drop of oil. Could even be more expensive. In fact it is more expensive, less efficient and less convenient with time delays as well, otherwise business would still use trains as the primary means of transport for goods, if not people. Huw |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
Roy wrote:
> "Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@preciscom SPAM.net> wrote in message > m... > >>No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take back >>it's industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and the EPA >>being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. > > > How about we cut your pension or however you get paid. I'm so sick of > hearing cut the employees wages as part of the cure all end all. Who the > hell here can afford a pay cut? > > Roy Obviously, Roy, you have problems with cause-effect thinking. If you apply for a commodity-type job and another guy is applying for the same job and he demands less money to accept employment, which do you think will get hired? If you can answer that question, then you have the logic skills to address the above issue. If not, then... Bill Putney (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with the letter 'x') |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Built like a Mercedes (?)
"Budd Cochran" <mr-d150@preciscom SPAM.net> wrote in message m... > No, it's about getting America to get off it's lard butt and take back > it's industry, but that would mean unions taking wage cuts and the EPA > being told to shut up and suck on a pine tree. > > If you want to buy American, it needs to be OWNED and built here. > > Japan and Germany didn't lose WW II, they just waited and bought us off. > > Budd > I think america let them -- japan they gave technology to -- but japan was already getting german technology -- BUT the americans bought from them -- i agree it needs to be built here -- not assembled here -- and owned by north americans -- actually in all industries here we need to be doing that whenever we can -- canada too -- we all have plenty of resources but we sell them cheap before we even look at using what we need first and then selling them cheap to our neighbours i think there are way too many fat executives at D-C who have forgotten about the average guy -- especially the ones who are going hungry working on their lines -- these guys are having a hard time buying gas or paying for the bus pass -- they really don't care about performance as long as it runs. the vw bug has had a great comeback. did D-C completely forget about the K car? we haven't. Cheap and reliable, cheap parts, GUARANTEE all the body and major parts will not change over the next 10 years unless there are faults or necessary improvements to be made (hey they have been at this long enough that 90's technology in something like that is a no-brainer -- and use existing common parts already being manufactured here wherever they can.) make it in 2 models with interchangeable body panels -- all with bench seats -- 2dr 2 seater club with 3 belts, cab hatchback with fold-down seats in the back (these should be equipped with lap belts with two sets of hookups for baby carriers), auto trans, optional AWD unless they can do this cheap on all models, no power accessories-- 4dr 4 seater with 6 belts hatchback station wagon with rear fold-seats and optional identical fold-down seats (with same belts) found in the 2dr with optional factory roof rack with built-in extension bars, auto trans, optional AWD, optional 4WD, luxury editions can have power options -- and call it simply the Chrysler K, K station wagon, K 4x4 -- gotta love those old AMC eagles put their most reliable components in them AND BUILD THEM or begin moving that way this car helped build their reputation -- and how about designing them so the driver can see all four quarters i think minivans are on their way out -- at least in canada they are doing this in other industries -- what about buy nine, get one free -- business incentive -- lets see the police drive around in them <grn> -- actually was thinking the parking police too but they don't deserve vehicles at all except to get away when someone is trying to assault them <vbgrn> my dad drove his k-car until it turned from beige to pink. his buddys teased him about his mary-k car while many drove expensive cars. he said he never worried about someone dinging him in the parking lot, and his wife has the new car so he doesn't have to worry about getting a call from her -- and it's the gentlemanly thing to do -- most had no response having the expensive cars for themselves. he always believed in driving a car into the ground -- and get two of the same thing. unless you need to downsize quickly or you are driving something soon to have problems or it's a real peice of crap, you bought it because you wanted it, so look after it -- it doesn't have to be new -- my 88 dakota is a real babe (waiting for motor installation -- bought it with cracked block -- i call it a perfect girly truck, but my male neighbours would like to have it too! www3.sympatico.ca/rske projects the poor dakota -- it is very unfair -- toyota did this too -- their littlest trucks they upgraded in size to get more money for them and now there is a big hole in the market that suzuki and the unreliable envoy are filling rach > "Pooh Bear" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> Comments4u wrote: >> >>> With job cuts announced on both sides of the Atlantic, its clear >>> Daimler-Chrysler is serious about cutting the fat. Even more, >>> it has announced plans for increased production at the currently >>> hot Chrysler unit without additional workers. That is truely >>> cutting the fat. But observers wonder if Daimler-Chrysler >>> has really identified all its fat. >> >> No. It's about getting America off its lardy ass and competing at >> world standard productivity levels. >> >> Compete or die. The world is hungry for jobs and there's no space for >> lazy weaklings. >> >> Graham >> > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Built like a Mercedes (?) | Comments4u | Driving | 1053 | March 18th 06 07:16 PM |
Mitchell [ 54 CDs ], Alldata 2004, [4 DVDs], [53 CDs], BMW, MERCEDES, AUDI, year 2005 - 2003 , total 107 CDs | vvcd | Simulators | 0 | December 8th 05 03:01 PM |
Zetsche to try Chrysler magic at Mercedes | Comments4u | Driving | 13 | October 24th 05 09:11 AM |
Zetsche to try Chrysler magic at Mercedes | Comments4u | Chrysler | 13 | October 24th 05 09:11 AM |
Mitchell on demand 2004 - 2003, Alldata CD SETs, BMW ETC, General Motors, Ford, BMW, Mercedes, Mercedes Truck, Mini E, Porsche, Saab, Volkswagen, Volvo, AUDI, Jaguar, Land Rover, CHRYSLER DODGE, Peugeot and Renault, Acura Isuzu, Kia, Mitsubishi, Niss | vvcd | VW water cooled | 0 | September 19th 04 11:35 PM |