Chrysler vanishes from Europe as Marchionne stems losses

"DAS" > wrote in message
...
> "Under Daimler, the brand renewed its effort in Europe, with sales
> peaking at about 120,000 cars in 2007"
>
> Re your rant in another thread.
>
> Yoou fail tu understand that cars made in NA just don't sell much in
> Europe. Note the Milanese dealer's lime of sedlling "American lifestyle".
> This is just niche marketing.
>
> GM and Ford sell vast quantities of cars in Europe (Ford has had a
> top-selling car in the UK for decades) because they make cars in various
> locations and don't try to impose US barges on European consumers. Ford's
> European R&D centres are good.
>
> GM has been enagaged in Europe since 1929, when it bought Adam Opel,
> Germany. Chrysler's efforts here have met with much less success.
>
> BTW, what is your problem that you have to use foul language to make your
> point?
>


Obviously, a minimal IQ and/or poor education.

clamz wrote:

> > BTW, what is your problem that you have to use foul language to
> > make your point?
>
> Obviously, a minimal IQ and/or poor education.

I dare you to come here and say that.

Nothing but the strongest and foulest language is appropriate for the
german and italian goons who destroyed a great car company.

Definitely poor education, as you don't seem to be aware that the English
language has all the facilities for irony, sarcasm and simple, though
substantial, criticism without needing to resort to foul language.

Bad language is normally a sign of an inability to express oneself, or even
of a lack of argument.

BTW, Chrysler might have been a 'great' company once, but was it so even
before Daimler bought it?

This was a subject of debate in this Chrysler usenet group of old (now a
pale shadow of its former self) and not everyone was agreed that Chrysler
was so great.

I think that real problem is that you suffer from a touch of xenophobia.

DAS
--
To reply directly replace 'nospam' with 'schmetterling'
--
"MoPar Man" > wrote in message
...
> clamz wrote:
>
>> > BTW, what is your problem that you have to use foul language to
>> > make your point?
>>
>> Obviously, a minimal IQ and/or poor education.
>
> I dare you to come here and say that.
>
> Nothing but the strongest and foulest language is appropriate for the
> german and italian goons who destroyed a great car company.