Laws for Kennedys vs. laws for the rest of us

On Sat, 06 May 2006 06:06:16 GMT, Bill Levinson
> wrote:

>Here is a guide to gun (and other laws) in the United States. Please
>feel free to circulate as widely as possible.
>
>(1) If you drive while drunk, you get arrested, lose your driver's
>license, and possibly go to jail unless you are a Kennedy, in which you
>get a free ride home from the police. *
>
>(2) If you kill someone because you were driving drunk, you go to jail
>unless you are a Kennedy, in which case you go to the Senate of the
>United States. *
>
>(3) If you possess a gun, let alone carry an automatic weapon into a
>Senate office building, in Washington DC then you go to jail unless you
>are Ted Kennedy's bodyguard, in which case you get a free pass.
>
>(4) If you try to bypass a Federal security checkpoint and then hit a
>police officer, you get arrested and possibly go to jail unless you are
>Cynthia McKinney, in which case you scream "Racism!" and get off.
>
>(5) You are not allowed to own a gun unless you are Rosie O'Donnell or
>her bodyguard, in which case you are allowed to own a gun.
>
>(6) If you merely possess a handgun in Washington DC, let alone
>recklessly endanger the neighborhood while hitting a trespasser with a
>"warning shot," you go to jail unless you are an influential columnist
>like Carl Rowan.
>
>* Neither Kennedy was actually convicted but there is strong evidence
>that they were in fact drunk as lords, or otherwise unfit to be driving
>motor vehicles.

Now tell us how Laura Bush ran a stop sign in front of witnesses and
killed her ex boy friend and NOTHING was ever done to her!!!! Now
there's special treatment.

> On Sat, 06 May 2006 06:06:16 GMT, Bill Levinson
> > wrote:
>
>>Here is a guide to gun (and other laws) in the United States. Please
>>feel free to circulate as widely as possible.
snip
>>(6) If you merely possess a handgun in Washington DC, let alone
>>recklessly endanger the neighborhood while hitting a trespasser with a
>>"warning shot," you go to jail unless you are an influential columnist
>>like Carl Rowan.

If he "hit a trespasser" it doesn't sound like he was recklessly
endangering anyone. If he *missed* the trespasser, then
perhaps.

Bernard

laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE wrote:

> On Sat, 06 May 2006 06:06:16 GMT, Bill Levinson
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Here is a guide to gun (and other laws) in the United States. Please
>>feel free to circulate as widely as possible.
>>
>>(1) If you drive while drunk, you get arrested, lose your driver's
>>license, and possibly go to jail unless you are a Kennedy, in which you
>>get a free ride home from the police. *
>>
>>(2) If you kill someone because you were driving drunk, you go to jail
>>unless you are a Kennedy, in which case you go to the Senate of the
>>United States. *
>>
>>(3) If you possess a gun, let alone carry an automatic weapon into a
>>Senate office building, in Washington DC then you go to jail unless you
>>are Ted Kennedy's bodyguard, in which case you get a free pass.
>>
>>(4) If you try to bypass a Federal security checkpoint and then hit a
>>police officer, you get arrested and possibly go to jail unless you are
>>Cynthia McKinney, in which case you scream "Racism!" and get off.
>>
>>(5) You are not allowed to own a gun unless you are Rosie O'Donnell or
>>her bodyguard, in which case you are allowed to own a gun.
>>
>>(6) If you merely possess a handgun in Washington DC, let alone
>>recklessly endanger the neighborhood while hitting a trespasser with a
>>"warning shot," you go to jail unless you are an influential columnist
>>like Carl Rowan.
>>
>>* Neither Kennedy was actually convicted but there is strong evidence
>>that they were in fact drunk as lords, or otherwise unfit to be driving
>>motor vehicles.
>
>
> Now tell us how Laura Bush ran a stop sign in front of witnesses and
> killed her ex boy friend and NOTHING was ever done to her!!!! Now
> there's special treatment.

Are you kidding?
She had to replace the bumper on her car after she she hit that death
trap Corvair the non seat belt wearing retard was driving.
Also, she wasn't under the influence of anything, did have a valid
driver's license, and had no political family, rich or otherwise, as
back up.

On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:17:38 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
> was understood to have stated the following:

>
>Now tell us how Laura Bush ran a stop sign in front of witnesses and
>killed her ex boy friend and NOTHING was ever done to her!!!! Now
>there's special treatment.

Yeah, it was very neat how the cops let an obviously intoxicated Laura
Welch skip her sobriety test! ROTLFMAO!



---

"Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law? Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty?" ~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973

> Milford Graves:
> Also, she wasn't under the influence of anything, did have a valid
> driver's license, and had no political family, rich or otherwise, as
> back up.

And she also was not, and still is not, a sitting senator who makes the
laws the rest of us have to obey, while demonstrating a blatent
disregard for those laws already on the books.

On Sun, 07 May 2006 16:17:38 GMT, laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
> wrote:

>Now tell us how Laura Bush ran a stop sign in front of witnesses and
>killed her ex boy friend and NOTHING was ever done to her!!!! Now
>there's special treatment.

Take all the screens you need to show why a member of a middle class Texas
Democrat family got any kind of special treatment 7 years before Laura Lane
Welch met George Bush.

> Now tell us how Laura Bush ran a stop sign in front of witnesses and
> killed her ex boy friend and NOTHING was ever done to her!!!! Now
> there's special treatment.

How was it special, when the article YOU posted said:

``As far as we know, no charges were filed,'' said Midland city
attorney Keith Stretcher. ``I don't think it's unusual that charges
weren't filed.''

Read that last sentence again. ``I don't think it's unusual that
charges weren't filed.''

How is that special treatment?

On Sun, 7 May 2006 23:55:04 -0400, necromancer > wrote:

>> Milford Graves:
>> Also, she wasn't under the influence of anything, did have a valid
>> driver's license, and had no political family, rich or otherwise, as
>> back up.
>
>And she also was not, and still is not, a sitting senator who makes the
>laws the rest of us have to obey, while demonstrating a blatent
>disregard for those laws already on the books.

"The vast majority of Americans share our commitment to basic fairness. They
agree that there must be fair rules, that we should not unilaterally abandon or
break those rules in the middle of the game." - Ted Kennedy, speaking about the
possible Republican elimination of the fillibuster tactic.

The latest Ted Kennedy ****-you to the rest of America is his action over the
proposed wind farm. A group spent 5 years planning, studying and getting
government review and input from 18 government agencies and getting tons of
permits and approvals; including filing a 3,800 page environmental impact
statment on the effects of building an wind power plant 5 miles from the coast
of Massachusetts. Kennedy is worried about a handful of tiny smudges on his
beachfront horizon, so without any congressional debate or discussion, he
slipped a provision into a Coast Guard appropriations bill that would allow the
Governor of Massachusetts (an opponent of the wind farm) to unilaterally veto
the construction.

"I strongly support renewable energy, including wind energy, as a means of
reducing our dependence on foreign oil and protecting the environment" - Ted
Kennedy - Aug 8, Cape Cod Times

In article >, Johnny Bravo wrote:

> "The vast majority of Americans share our commitment to basic fairness. They
> agree that there must be fair rules, that we should not unilaterally abandon or
> break those rules in the middle of the game." - Ted Kennedy, speaking about the
> possible Republican elimination of the fillibuster tactic.
>
> The latest Ted Kennedy ****-you to the rest of America is his action over the
> proposed wind farm. A group spent 5 years planning, studying and getting
> government review and input from 18 government agencies and getting tons of
> permits and approvals; including filing a 3,800 page environmental impact
> statment on the effects of building an wind power plant 5 miles from the coast
> of Massachusetts. Kennedy is worried about a handful of tiny smudges on his
> beachfront horizon, so without any congressional debate or discussion, he
> slipped a provision into a Coast Guard appropriations bill that would allow the
> Governor of Massachusetts (an opponent of the wind farm) to unilaterally veto
> the construction.

> "I strongly support renewable energy, including wind energy, as a means of
> reducing our dependence on foreign oil and protecting the environment" - Ted
> Kennedy - Aug 8, Cape Cod Times

When is it going to become obvious to everyone with three brain cells to
rub together that those in government, especially those there for a long
time consider themselves ruling elites and us nothing but well sheep at
best, slaves at worst?

Energy is a mechanism of control. Control energy, control the people.
Wind power was just fine when it was pie-in-sky and very low volume at best.
Now, through dedicated effort, it's viable enough to attract investment.
Profitable enough to build. What's the result? Kill wind power
politically, mobilize environmentalists against wind power (chopped up
birds) and sneak in legislation to kill wind power.

Mark my words, the same will occur with ethanol. As the viability of
ethanol increases it will be stomped.

BTW, did you know drunk driver jr, teddy's kid started in politics at age
21. He has never had a real job. The two party 'team' politics must be
dismantled before it is too late.

On Mon, 08 May 2006 13:58:46 -0500, (Brent P)
wrote:
>

>BTW, did you know drunk driver jr, teddy's kid started in politics at age
>21. He has never had a real job. The two party 'team' politics must be
>dismantled before it is too late.

It's already too late.

(Great handle, btw....)


(change Arabic number to Roman numeral to email)