why bush likes the $$ of OIL

Well. the war certainly has helped raise the price of OIL.
they were going to call the war Operation Iraqi Liberation but ,
well it was embarrassing. = O.I.L.
>
g adds.
MONEY , what a concept

smokin' gun wrote:
> Well. the war certainly has helped raise the price of OIL.
> they were going to call the war Operation Iraqi Liberation but ,
> well it was embarrassing. = O.I.L.
> >
> g adds.
> MONEY , what a concept

I wish you guys would get your stories straight. One time you were
telling us it was so we could steal their oil and get it cheap, now
it's so that the price of oil will go up.

Will you nutcases PLEASE have a meeting and get your stories straight?
Geesh.

>> Well. the war certainly has helped raise the price of OIL.
>> they were going to call the war Operation Iraqi Liberation but ,
>> well it was embarrassing. = O.I.L.
>>>
>> g adds.
>> MONEY , what a concept
>
> I wish you guys would get your stories straight. One time you were
> telling us it was so we could steal their oil and get it cheap, now
> it's so that the price of oil will go up.

What makes you think the oil companys stealing their oil will make it any
cheaper for the end purchaser?

All it means is even higher profits for the well connected (pun intended)
oil industry. Have you been keeping an eye on that lately, or is Rush not
reporting it?

And we all know Bush has no ties to big oil - right, Larry?

> >> Well. the war certainly has helped raise the price of OIL.
> >> they were going to call the war Operation Iraqi Liberation but ,
> >> well it was embarrassing. = O.I.L.
> >
> > I wish you guys would get your stories straight. One time you were
> > telling us it was so we could steal their oil and get it cheap, now
> > it's so that the price of oil will go up.
>
> What makes you think the oil companys stealing their oil will make it any
> cheaper for the end purchaser?

That's what the anti-war, anti-bush people kept telling us before the
war. Obviously with oil > $50 a barrel for quite a while, that's not
happening.

> All it means is even higher profits for the well connected (pun intended)
> oil industry.

Not with oil at > $50 a barrell.

> Have you been keeping an eye on that lately, or is Rush not > reporting it?

Sorry, your assumptions wrong. I don't listen to Rush. I find
monologue shows boring.

> And we all know Bush has no ties to big oil - right, Larry?

All politicians have ties to something. But that's a strawman. The
point is the anti-bush, anti-war people totally changed their tune in
the false "war for oil" concept once they saw their first theory was
dead wrong. First it was so oil would be cheap, now it's because oil
is high priced. Pick your nutty theory and stick with it, would ya?