e46 manuals

wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:55:41 GMT, dizzy > wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:56:53 -0400, Fred W > wrote:
>>>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In Boolean algebra it isn't "not innocent - innocent" "Guilty - not Guilty"
>>>>>
>>>>> Try using that in a computer program - won't work!
>>>>>
>>>>> IF, AND, NOT, OR, THEN but never MAYBE!
>>>>
>>>>Another way of expressing it is logically:
>>>>
>>>>Just because all innocent people are not-guilty, and all guilty people
>>>>are not innocent, does not mean that all not-guilty people are innocent
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes but Dizzy wouldn't understand it.........
>>
>>Says the scumbag who rationalizes his immoral behavior with "Let he
>>who is without sin cast the first stone". The same scumbag who denies
>>that there are different severity levels to immoral behavior ,
>>claiming that people are either "guilty or not guilty". A
>>transparent, stupid scumbag, fooling no one but possibly himself.
>
>Dizzy - you recognize the trait in yourself...............

Wrong again, scumbag.